|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Changing build/release terminologyRe: Changing build/release terminology
From: Michael Carr <cstrife89_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:05:57 -0400 On 3/28/2012 9:16 AM, Torne Wuff wrote: > On 28 March 2012 12:21, Jonathan Gordon<jdgordy_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Sounds good to me. Not sure if I like "stable release" though, what >> are other projects using? perhaps "official release"? > official release makes it sound like the other builds are not > official, which is the wrong distinction i'm trying to avoid. My > experience reading the forums/irc/lists is that nontechnical people do > not make the connection between "release" and "thing we specifically > released as a specific thing, as opposed to an autobuild", and thus a > term that relies on "release" meaning something to people is not > ideal. Any build we offer for download looks like a release to them :) > I thought of "polished release", but that sounds a bit silly. :) What about something like "LTS (long-term-service) build"? -- Strife89 cstrife89_at_gmail.comReceived on 2012-03-28 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |