dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Please help test gerrit#890

Re: Please help test gerrit#890

From: Jonathan Gordon <>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:20:45 +1000

On 7 July 2014 05:18, Thomas Martitz <> wrote:

> Am 05.07.2014 10:30, schrieb Jonathan Gordon:
> What you are proposing to add is the exact opposite what we did a few
> years back, when we all happily agreed that the offset-approach is better
> for the skin engine. Please clear me up on why you want to reverse that
> choice.
> This is factually incorrect. *I* switched to the offset scheme so the skin
engine's buffer could be moved into a buflib handle instead of the
statically allocated buffer which was wasteful. Offsets were the only
sensible option at the time because we were still learning how to use
buflib correctly.

> Best regards.
Received on 2014-07-07

Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew