- Status Closed
- Percent Complete
- Task Type Patches
- Category
- Assigned To No-one
- Operating System
- Severity Low
- Priority Very Low
- Reported Version
- Due in Version Undecided
-
Due Date
Undecided
- Votes
- Private
FS#2789 - patch for H300 lcd remote buttons
This patch changes the button mappings of the remote to
the (nearly) correct ones. The H100 and H300 remotes
differs in
1) The H100 remote has “Bitrate” and “Source” buttons
(in addition to the ones who are “clones” of buttons on
the main unit), while the H300 has additional “-10” and
“+10”. I chosed to remap “-10” and “+10” to “Source” and “Bitrate”, respectively, because they are 2 in both
remotes and in both cases they are on something that
has 3 states - source/rec/bitrate (iirc) and -10/play/+10
Note: this patch doesn’t add support for the h300
NON-lcd remote. For now we can’t read button other than
“Play/pause” on that remote, so it’s useless atm.
Loading...
Available keyboard shortcuts
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + l Login Dialog / Logout
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + a Add new task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + m My searches
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + t focus taskid search
Tasklist
- o open selected task
- j move cursor down
- k move cursor up
Task Details
- n Next task
- p Previous task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + e ↵ Enter Edit this task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + w watch task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + y Close Task
Task Editing
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + s save task
New in v4.1:
1) option for selecting the remote type: H100 or H300 LCD
(no NON-lcd h300 yet). Please, test it and add comments
(especially if you're h100 remote user, even if you have
iriver h1x0)
2) changed button mappings for h100's remotes, too. Please,
comment them.
Note: the patch isn't ready for commiting. There are many
commented out lines in it.
do you co-operate with "takka - tfact" /
"[ 1374953 ] H1x0 or H3x0 select remote patch"
?
it seems like you're doing the same seperately…
do you co-operate with "takka - tfact" /
"[ 1374953 ] H1x0 or H3x0 select remote patch"
?
it seems like you're doing the same seperately…
is this still needed? at the very least i assume this patch is waay out of sync?