Rockbox

Tasklist

FS#2789 - patch for H300 lcd remote buttons

Attached to Project: Rockbox
Opened by Hristo Kovachev (bger) - Sunday, 27 November 2005, 23:44 GMT
Task Type Patches
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Operating System
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

This patch changes the button mappings of the remote to
the (nearly) correct ones. The H100 and H300 remotes
differs in
1) The H100 remote has "Bitrate" and "Source" buttons
(in addition to the ones who are "clones" of buttons on
the main unit), while the H300 has additional "-10" and
"+10". I chosed to remap "-10" and "+10" to "Source"
and "Bitrate", respectively, because they are 2 in both
remotes and in both cases they are on something that
has 3 states - source/rec/bitrate (iirc) and -10/play/+10

Note: this patch doesn't add support for the h300
NON-lcd remote. For now we can't read button other than
"Play/pause" on that remote, so it's useless atm.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Hristo Kovachev (bger)
Sunday, 16 July 2006, 19:08 GMT
Reason for closing:  Out of Date
Comment by Hristo Kovachev (bger) - Wednesday, 21 December 2005, 17:55 GMT

New in v4.1:
1) option for selecting the remote type: H100 or H300 LCD
(no NON-lcd h300 yet). Please, test it and add comments
(especially if you're h100 remote user, even if you have
iriver h1x0)
2) changed button mappings for h100's remotes, too. Please,
comment them.
Note: the patch isn't ready for commiting. There are many
commented out lines in it.
Comment by Anonymous Submitter - Tuesday, 27 December 2005, 18:01 GMT

do you co-operate with "takka - tfact" /
"[ 1374953 ] H1x0 or H3x0 select remote patch"
?

it seems like you're doing the same seperately...
Comment by Anonymous Submitter - Tuesday, 27 December 2005, 18:20 GMT

do you co-operate with "takka - tfact" /
"[ 1374953 ] H1x0 or H3x0 select remote patch"
?

it seems like you're doing the same seperately...
Comment by Jonathan Gordon (jdgordon) - Sunday, 16 July 2006, 06:46 GMT
is this still needed? at the very least i assume this patch is waay out of sync?

Loading...