Rockbox

Tasklist

FS#7309 - Dynamic playlist and Play Next

Attached to Project: Rockbox
Opened by Jonathan Mueller (JonathanMueller) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 15:30 GMT
Last edited by Paul Louden (Llorean) - Saturday, 28 July 2007, 00:09 GMT
Task Type Bugs
Category Playlists
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Operating System iPod 4G Grayscale
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version Daily build (which?)
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

I created a dynamic playlist from the database. Then I browsed through files and found a new song. Holding down the select button, I chose Playlist>Play Next. I pushed next to get to the new song. When the song finishes playing, it repeats and the playlist counter says "-55/1".
This task depends upon

Closed by  Paul Louden (Llorean)
Saturday, 28 July 2007, 00:09 GMT
Reason for closing:  Invalid
Additional comments about closing:  Cannot reproduce the actual "bug" part of this. If it comes back, please open a new task.
Comment by Paul Louden (Llorean) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 19:01 GMT
"Play Next" replaces the current playlist with whatever you had highlighted (folder, file). So when the current song ends, there is no playlist beyond whatever you've chosen with "Play Next" and anything you've "Insert"ed after.

I'm trying to understand, is there a bug here I'm missing, or are you reporting what is expected behaviour for the function, and just behaviour that you didn't expect?
Comment by Jonathan Mueller (JonathanMueller) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 19:19 GMT
I guess that makes sense, function wise. I guessed it would insert the song into the current playlist.

I guess the bug would be the playlist counter saying "-55/1". It should be "1/" at that point.
Comment by Paul Louden (Llorean) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 19:42 GMT
"Insert" is what inserts the song. "Play Next" means, act as if you've played this from the file browser. Next.
Comment by Jonathan Mueller (JonathanMueller) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 19:59 GMT
Ok, but what about the numbers problem?
Comment by Paul Louden (Llorean) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 20:00 GMT
That? That's a genuine bug. Is it reproduceable?
Comment by Jonathan Mueller (JonathanMueller) - Thursday, 14 June 2007, 20:28 GMT
Tried it again and wasn't able to reproduce. This time it says "1/1" as it should. Don't know what happened before.

Loading...