Rockbox

Tasklist

FS#8122 - Tagnavi_custom don't works

Attached to Project: Rockbox
Opened by Dirk Schemionek (DirkS) - Friday, 09 November 2007, 08:05 GMT
Last edited by Marc Guay (Marc_Guay) - Monday, 31 March 2008, 18:33 GMT
Task Type Bugs
Category User Interface
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Operating System Sansa e200
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version Daily build (which?)
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

It is not possible to change the basic format declarations in the tagnavi with the tagnavi_custom file because the %include command is written after that basic declaration block.
Tested with Version r15525.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Marc Guay (Marc_Guay)
Monday, 31 March 2008, 18:33 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a Bug
Additional comments about closing:  Comments indicate that this is simply the way it works.
Comment by Thomas Martitz (kugel.) - Monday, 12 November 2007, 00:12 GMT
According to the wiki, the %include command should be written before basic format declaratoins. But the tagnavi.config itselfs has it written after.
Comment by Robert Kukla (roolku) - Friday, 30 November 2007, 10:57 GMT
Where did you find that "the %include command should be written before basic format declarations"? This is not the case.

If it is moved before the format declarations you can't use them in the tagnavi_custom.config. You can however write your own format definitions for use in tagnavi_custom.config with different names.
Comment by Dirk Schemionek (DirkS) - Friday, 30 November 2007, 11:46 GMT
It is not possible to change the Basic format declarations by using the tagnavi_custom.config file if the %include command is written after the Basic format declarations-Block. E.g. try to change the length of tracknumbers from 2 to 3 digits and you will understand what i mean.
Comment by Robert Kukla (roolku) - Friday, 30 November 2007, 13:50 GMT
I understand perfectly and I never claimed it was possible.
Instead I justified the reasons why the current order is intentional and suggested an alternative solution.

Loading...