Wiki > Main > DevConWest2007 (compare)
Difference: DevConWest2007 (r68 vs. r67)
When: June 15th - 17th Where: Las Vegas, Nevada
Many of us have sat back and looked at the previous Devcon and even this coming one and have been saddened at it being too far or too expensive to attend. Well, it was talked about last year, but this year we decided to do something about it! This page is to be used as a place for storing all of the information instead of having to go through the thread and to have a better picture of it all.
Discussion about it is held on the Dev-mailing list starting with this thread http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-dev-archive-2007-04/0009.shtml .
Post-game wrap-up is here: http://scorche.cleansoap.org/rockbox/dcw.html http://www.squisch.net/rockbox/dcw.html .
The location will be in Las Vegas, Nevada. This is due to an attempt to get as many people as possible to attend and travel costs. It will be held in a suite in the Signature at MGM Grand (http://www.signaturemgmgrand.com/).
Address for the Signature is: 145 East Harmon Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
DevCon-West is to take place on June 15th - 17th.
Here's a list of persons who are planning to show up. Please state your current status in parentheses after your name.
Since we can code and IRC at home, too, we should focus on helpful group activities.
Ideas for discussion:
(This list is being defined and likely will depend on what happens at DevCon2007.)
Bring your own laptop and DAP devices of choice. We'd need enough power outlets for wall-wart chargers. A USB hub might be helpful. A webcam for friends who can't attend physically would be great.
From McCarran International Airport:
Due to the valet nature of the hotel, AustinAppel will not be able to go back and forth between the hotel and the airport. It still might be possible to have some be picked up though. Be aware that not all taxi drivers know the Signature yet, as it is relatively new (most should by now though). Some know it as "the new towers at MGM Grand".
You'll find that many people will speak at least some English.
AustinAppel might participate depending where he is at the time and does have a car.
In the suite with AustinAppel:
While discussing themes, one of the first topics to come up was the fact that the terms WPS and Theme seem interchangeable, and this can, on certain occasions, cause difficulty, especially when attempting to support something not working as intended, or when a very specific meaning is meant in technical discussion. Because of this we decided that we should do what we can to promote or clarify the distinction between WPS (meaning specifically just the .wps file and associated bitmaps) and Theme (meaning the .cfg file, and all files it references). One thing that was not decided is what fundamental elements define a theme (which lines, at a minimum, must a theme contain to be considered a theme) nor the maximum extent of what it encompasses (for example, is the status bar, display of scrollbar, etc, considered to be a part of a theme at this time, or does a .cfg file containing these options go beyond the limit of what a theme is). Both of these are mostly irrelevant though, since it can be summarized roughly to "A WPS is a .wps file, a theme is the common category of .cfg files that loads WPSes and changes the appearance of Rockbox"
Another point that the developers at DevConWest agreed on was that the current wiki system is not able to effectively meet our needs as a theme gallery, especially with increasing copyright concern and the desire to ensure that the themes themselves are functional. As well, it would be ideal to have RBUtil able to retrieve themes from our repository rather than a third party site that is beyond the control of the project. To this end it would be ideal if conversation with RedBreva could lead to something that meets what we felt were ideal requirements, and if not, hopefully find someone interested in developing a new theme gallery on official webspace meeting those requirements. The first requirement, obviously, is that themes are made available in a way that RBUtil can parse and retrieve them.
The others are as follows:
Unfortunately we did not manage to create objective copyright guidelines, as we aren't sure where copyright falls on issues such as actual interface layout, vs reproduction of graphics, and probably need a wider set of minds discussing this. The current candidate for suggested license of the themes is the Creative Commons Attribution + ShareAlike (by-sa) license. We felt it would be ideal if there were only one license for themes, but as media included in the theme may be under other licenses that allow similar use, it may be better to instead have a list of requirements from the license, and then list one (or a few) licenses that allow them.
To go along with these restrictions, the current theme wiki pages will be marked as deprecated upon posting of the new gallery. All themes with clear license statements will be migrated and the rest will be left as they are until the original author or someone with the authority to do so submit them to the new gallery with the appropriate license information and any required changes.
All themes will be divided by screen resolution only. To this end, we expect to have to fix some WPS tags to validate, and not break formatting, on targets without the equivalent hardware. For example the patch to make the RTC display hyphens when not present, so as to take up the same amount of space (assuming fixed width fonts, felt to be a fair assumption if the formatting depends on character width anyway). Some other tags may need to be examined (hold switch, virtual LED, etc) before this is complete, but would allow more flexible interchange of themes, and mean the requiring of only a single validator.
Several humans will of course have to monitor the step requiring human validation, but it was felt that as checking the license and screenshots is likely to only take a matter of minutes at most, this should not be a real problem.
For themes that require an unsupported build, there are further requirements and a few changes:
The reasoning for this follows: We feel it is good to encourage people to try out new and upcoming features and help bug test the patches. At the same time, we feel that any official gallery should contain only patches hosted by us (and thus findable by the interested user), as well as all unsupported themes should be at least in some way related to the advancement of the official Rockbox as it is the official gallery. Unfortunately, this means some themes requiring patches currently available may not be able to be added to the official 'unsupported' gallery.
These guidelines are of course open to comment, and any one of us will be more than happy to attempt to explain the reasoning that reached each of these conclusions. To follow on this, if RedBreva is not interested in moving rockbox-themes.org in line with whatever the final decision meets, we decided he should be asked to change his sidebar (or remove it) in a significant enough manner that it is very apparent his site is not official, and to attempt to make sure it is clear to users that rockbox-themes.org is not a 'supported' supplier of themes (in the sense that if things there do not work, it is not our responsibility or fault).
Another hot topic was the question: "RBUtil - What is it, and what should it be?" In the end the general consensus was that there's no real value in limiting RBUtil to an installation utility. It's clearly already becoming more than that, and there can be a lot of great value to the end user from it. But there is also the possibility of it becoming large beyond need with music management functions or other incorporated functionality. To that end it was decided that a currently ideal target would be to have it do exactly what the name suggests: Be a utility for bridging the gap between Rockbox and your PC. To this end, some example features that would be nice to see added include font conversion (from TTF ideally, though BDF should be sufficient), database generation, and video conversion. Where the tools already exist within the /tools/ folder, we see no problem with incorporating them directly. As well with minimalistic additions, such as perhaps otf2bdf or similar, this should also not be a problem. Where a larger freestanding program exists, such as VLC or ffmpeg (or whatever video converter is chosen) RBUtil's functionality should then instead be as a front end (functioning similarly to WinFF's interaction to ffmepg, for example). RBUtil should not handle music management: All operations should take place either to files or data on the player, or be in some way necessary for Rockbox to make use of the file (such as font or video conversion, music conversion was not discussed but due to Rockbox's incredibly wide support should not be a real concern.) Syncing and other collection management functions (tag editing, etc) should not be among the features it performs as these are best left to programs designed for them, and do not really qualify under the above categories. Beyond this we think it would be wonderful to see RBUtil expand beyond its already impressive state to wherever it may go, as long as the focus is always clearly Rockbox functions.
AHHHHHH! A snake! A snake! Snake a snake! Ohhhhh....it's a snake.
Summarized to "We agreed that it's a great tool, but it's hard to tell if the benefits of conversion outweigh the effort of moving over, since the current solution does just work right now."
Although Next DevCon wasn't discussed thoroughly, we felt it might be best to alternate between here in the US and in Europe, rather than trying to have it in the same place each year. That way those who can't afford the trip at the more distant location at least might be able to make it to half of them, and those who are able can attend all. It was suggested and thought a good idea that we might consult a travel agent (or similar specialist) on locations for it, under the assumption that the up front cost might help us discover locations that are significantly cheaper or more accessible than those we might otherwise look at, probably benefiting all future DevCons.
r70 - 10 Dec 2008 - 22:57:55 - NicolasPennequinRevision r68 - 14 May 2008 - 07:41 - AustinAppel
Revision r67 - 13 May 2008 - 17:46 - MarcGuay
Copyright © by the contributing authors.