00:01:12 | | Quit ender` (Quit: "I don't believe in aging," said the Knight. "Do enough of it, and you die." -- Simon R. Green: Casino Infernale) |
00:12:53 | | Quit Scall (Read error: Operation timed out) |
00:17:50 | | Join Scall [0] (~chat@unaffiliated/scall) |
00:23:44 | | Quit kugel (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
00:23:56 | | Join robin0800 [0] (~robin0800@cpc1-brig15-2-0-cust755.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com) |
00:24:30 | pamaury | kugel(logs): the sony nwz has no power button, any button boots up the device |
00:32:30 | | Quit pamaury (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
00:46:27 | | Quit SrRaven (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
00:48:59 | | Join SrRaven [0] (srraven@fatfecker.shagged.org) |
00:54:25 | | Quit n1s (Quit: Ex-Chat) |
00:59:19 | | Join [Saint] [0] (65629e67@rockbox/user/saint) |
01:00 |
01:03:02 | | Quit robin0800 (Read error: Operation timed out) |
01:05:48 | | Quit bertrik (Remote host closed the connection) |
01:21:33 | | Quit lebellium (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 25.0/20130923194050]) |
01:25:04 | | Quit Scr0mple (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
01:25:49 | | Join Scromple [0] (~Simon@161.43.73.67) |
01:28:40 | | Join nosa-j [0] (~m00k@184.76.254.130) |
01:45:48 | | Join robin0800 [0] (~robin0800@cpc1-brig15-2-0-cust755.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com) |
01:57:13 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
02:00 |
02:08:03 | | Quit makoto (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
02:08:34 | | Quit damarusama (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
02:25:01 | | Join makoto [0] (~makoto@hey.dont.privmsg.me.uk) |
02:25:25 | | Nick makoto is now known as Guest52012 (~makoto@hey.dont.privmsg.me.uk) |
02:41:24 | | Join damarusama [0] (~androirc@209.52.44.61) |
02:57:15 | | Quit nosa-j (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
02:58:18 | | Join nosa-j [0] (~m00k@184.76.254.130) |
03:00 |
03:30:24 | | Join Scr0mple [0] (~Simon@161.43.73.67) |
03:32:18 | | Quit Scromple (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
03:34:26 | | Join cmhobbs [0] (~cmhobbs@fsf/member/cmhobbs) |
03:43:35 | | Join amayer [0] (~amayer@72.25.54.151) |
03:44:02 | | Nick DormantBrain is now known as SuperBrainAK (~andy@2001:470:8:a61::5f92:59a1) |
03:57:17 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
04:00 |
04:08:14 | | Quit robin0800 (Quit: Leaving) |
04:09:53 | | Quit cmhobbs (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
04:12:29 | | Join robin0800 [0] (~robin0800@cpc1-brig15-2-0-cust755.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com) |
04:19:00 | | Join mystica555 [0] (~mystica55@172.56.10.40) |
04:19:32 | | Quit amayer (Quit: Leaving) |
04:22:08 | uberushaximus | Hm, I've tried bridging the pins on my clipv1 and I can't access the disk |
04:25:15 | uberushaximus | when I do see flash, I only see 4mb |
04:31:46 | [Saint] | I won't even bother with asking why you thought you needed to do this, but since you seem to have ignored the massive red warning on the top of the wiki page I'll assume you know what you're doing and move on... |
04:32:11 | uberushaximus | :P |
04:32:33 | uberushaximus | I can tell you what symptoms I've been having otherwise |
04:32:51 | [Saint] | FWIW, I'm talking about the "IF YOU TRY THESE WHEN YOUR DEVICE IS NOT ACTUALLY BRICKED, YOU ARE RUNNING AN UNNECESSARY RISK OF DESTROYING YOUR PLAYER. If you think your device is bricked, please chat with us on IRC to confirm this is the case before pulling out your soldering iron. " section. |
04:33:27 | [Saint] | I have seen so many people abuse that page and needlessly destroy devices. |
04:34:24 | uberushaximus | Nothing seems to have changed |
04:34:27 | uberushaximus | :) |
04:36:27 | [Saint] | Gah...ok...so, what made you think you needed to do this? |
04:45:28 | | Quit damarusama (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
04:57:58 | | Join amiconn_ [0] (amiconn@rockbox/developer/amiconn) |
04:57:59 | | Quit amiconn (Disconnected by services) |
04:57:59 | | Quit pixelma (Disconnected by services) |
04:57:59 | | Join pixelma_ [0] (pixelma@rockbox/staff/pixelma) |
04:58:01 | | Nick pixelma_ is now known as pixelma (pixelma@rockbox/staff/pixelma) |
04:58:01 | | Nick amiconn_ is now known as amiconn (amiconn@rockbox/developer/amiconn) |
05:00 |
05:45:41 | | Quit [7] (Disconnected by services) |
05:45:50 | | Join TheSeven [0] (~quassel@rockbox/developer/TheSeven) |
05:50:21 | | Join Strife89 [0] (~Strife89@adsl-98-80-230-46.mcn.bellsouth.net) |
05:57:19 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
06:00 |
06:02:29 | | Quit robin0800 (Quit: Leaving) |
06:38:15 | | Quit Zagor (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
06:38:41 | | Join kevku [0] (~kevku@2001:470:27:773:0:feed:c0f:fee) |
06:38:42 | | Join Zagor [242] (~bjst@rockbox/developer/Zagor) |
07:00 |
07:05:04 | | Quit kiwicam (Remote host closed the connection) |
07:09:00 | | Join kiwicam [0] (~quassel@101.98.163.139) |
07:12:02 | * | [Saint] seems to be having an "overly descriptive forum post" day... |
07:16:38 | [Saint] | Hmmmmm...wha? |
07:16:56 | [Saint] | Why is the iPod Video's CPU frequency at 11289600 |
07:17:14 | [Saint] | My understanding is that it runs at 24MHz, 30MHz, or 80MHz. |
07:19:33 | [Saint] | (also, why is it that the iPod Video actually has a 24MHz configuration, but AFAIK this can only be accessed via the System -> Debug (Keep Out!) -> CPU frequency page by pressing Select...?) |
07:33:29 | soap | buschel would be the one to ask about ipod CPU speeds IIRC, [Saint] |
07:35:17 | * | [Saint] cannot remember how to overclock/underclock the PPs. |
07:35:45 | [Saint] | I know I did previously have one running at 24MHz/100MHz (default is 24/80) |
07:35:56 | [Saint] | *30/80 |
07:37:37 | | Quit Zagor (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
07:40:46 | [Saint] | I mean...wouldn't that make the iPod Video's max CPU something like 11MHz? |
07:42:34 | [Saint] | If I go with what I know, my mind is telling me that it should be '#define CPU_FREQ 80000000' |
07:45:01 | [Saint] | soap: sorry, I didn't see your reply - there's a slight problem with that, though, I haven't seen buschel in many moons... |
07:46:03 | [Saint] | soap: you have a few of the PP iPods, no? I don't suppose you have any of the old under/overclocking patches floating around do you? |
07:47:20 | [Saint] | ...hmmm, not that they would be valid anymore. |
07:49:44 | [Saint] | Hahahaha....gotta love comments like this buried in the CPU setup stuffs: |
07:49:47 | [Saint] | "/* what's this do? */" |
07:57:22 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
07:59:43 | [Saint] | Additionally, what is the difference between CPU_DEFAULT and CPU_NORMAL? |
08:00 |
08:00:46 | | Join wodz [0] (~wodz@87-207-223-0.dynamic.chello.pl) |
08:02:39 | wodz | [Saint]: I don't know how general it is but according to my understanding CPU_DEFAULT is the default speed cpu is in after power-up (with PLL turned off). It is used on some players which can turn off PLL to save some power (coldfires only?), CPU_NORMAL is well normal speed rb configures clock to |
08:03:37 | [Saint] | the PPs can also turn off PLL, iiuc. |
08:03:39 | [Saint] | Also, thanks. |
08:04:17 | [Saint] | So its the "cpu fre we boot in until something takes over", if I were to /reaaaaaly/ simplify the description? |
08:05:00 | wodz | I guess this is not general rule as sometimes some rom code runs before we take over |
08:06:15 | wodz | for example on rk27xx virgin boot gives you 12MHz clock BUT nand bootloader which runs before rb bootloader sets this clock to 200MHz |
08:06:19 | [Saint] | Right, pretty sure I have this worked out now. |
08:07:27 | [Saint] | I set it up so that I can comment out sections/uncomment sections and test to see how far I can go before stuff starts falling over. |
08:07:55 | [Saint] | I can now range from 15MHz to 120MHz, but I doubt that will be stable at all. |
08:08:17 | [Saint] | I'm going to give 24/100MHz a go first. |
08:09:15 | [Saint] | AFter that I may give 110MHz a go, but I really doubt it. |
08:10:14 | wodz | [Saint]: the NORMAL freq should be choosen such as most of your audio collection decode unboosted |
08:11:07 | wodz | [Saint]: So 30 vs 24 you may gain nothing depending on files you play. |
08:11:32 | [Saint] | ~2mA |
08:11:42 | [Saint] | Its not much, but, its something. |
08:12:04 | wodz | yes unless your player starts to boost to keep the playback |
08:12:18 | [Saint] | (that's ancient measurements, though, maybe this has increased or decreased by now...I can check) |
08:12:35 | [Saint] | The device shouldn't ever boost unless it needs to refill the buffer. |
08:12:44 | [Saint] | GUI boost is disabled, and its only playing flac. |
08:13:15 | [Saint] | SO I expect I could probably go lower than 24MHz, but the GUI will probably start to suffer much below that. |
08:13:50 | wodz | You are not right. If you need 38.30MHz for realtime playback (vorbis_500.ogg according to our CodecPerformanceComparison) it will definitely boost |
08:14:15 | wodz | 30MHz is quite good compromise |
08:14:19 | [Saint] | "and its only playing flac" |
08:15:12 | | Join LinusN [0] (linus@giant.haxx.se) |
08:15:22 | wodz | ah, right with flacs you can go lower probably |
08:15:31 | [Saint] | Flac needs something like 10MHz |
08:15:41 | wodz | like 12 :-) |
08:15:53 | [Saint] | ...did it get worse? |
08:16:29 | [Saint] | Oh, hmmmm, I see...right. 12MHz for flac8 |
08:16:37 | wodz | http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparison#Portal_Player_40ARM7TDMI_41 says flac_5 is 11.50 flac_8 is 12.26 |
08:16:55 | [Saint] | That was in 2010 though, I suspect we've gotten better since then. |
08:17:03 | [Saint] | One way to find out I guess. |
08:17:10 | wodz | feel free to run benchmark and update the wiki |
08:17:55 | wodz | BTW. I think I start to understand how FTL on rk27xx is organized. |
08:18:24 | [Saint] | Prod TheSeven, he's some form of FTL mastermind. |
08:18:37 | [Saint] | (and, a general mastermind as well) |
08:19:07 | wodz | yeah, I chatted with him and he redirected me to the code :P |
08:19:52 | [Saint] | Oh, :P |
08:28:02 | | Quit rdn (Remote host closed the connection) |
08:32:28 | | Quit wodz (Read error: Operation timed out) |
08:33:03 | | Join ender` [0] (krneki@foo.eternallybored.org) |
08:35:20 | | Join Water [0] (~chatzilla@adsl-68-253-231-154.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net) |
08:36:42 | Water | Anyone know why I'd be getting really slow USB speeds (<1MB/s) on my e200v2 when I use a 32GB microSD, but an 8GB has normal transfer speed? |
08:42:21 | | Quit zoktar (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
08:42:23 | | Quit stoyan (Remote host closed the connection) |
08:44:28 | | Join zoktar [0] (~zoktar@unaffiliated/zoktar) |
08:53:26 | | Join mortalis [0] (~kvirc@213.33.220.118) |
08:55:46 | | Join wodz [0] (~wodz@87-207-223-0.dynamic.chello.pl) |
08:55:50 | | Join einhirn [0] (~Miranda@2001:638:605:4:a151:6053:6ae3:8a99) |
08:56:17 | | Quit Water (Remote host closed the connection) |
09:00 |
09:00:24 | | Join kugel [0] (~kugel@rockbox/developer/kugel) |
09:08:07 | | Quit wodz (Quit: Leaving) |
09:10:07 | | Quit nosa-j (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
09:11:55 | | Quit mystica555 (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
09:15:51 | | Join nosa-j [0] (~m00k@184.76.254.130) |
09:21:08 | fs-bluebot | Build Server message: New build round started. Revision c300c1b, 223 builds, 18 clients. |
09:21:59 | | Join Zagor [0] (~bjst@sestofw01.enea.se) |
09:21:59 | | Quit Zagor (Changing host) |
09:21:59 | | Join Zagor [242] (~bjst@rockbox/developer/Zagor) |
09:29:01 | | Join lebellium [0] (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
09:29:57 | fs-bluebot | Build Server message: Build round completed after 529 seconds. |
09:57:25 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
10:00 |
10:00:25 | | Quit liar (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
10:06:52 | | Nick Guest52012 is now known as makoto (~makoto@hey.dont.privmsg.me.uk) |
10:19:43 | | Join pamaury [0] (~quassel@rockbox/developer/pamaury) |
10:20:43 | | Join wodz [0] (~wodz@iwl138.internetdsl.tpnet.pl) |
10:22:05 | | Join liar [0] (~liar@83.175.90.24) |
10:23:10 | | Quit nosa-j (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
10:26:57 | | Join nosa-j [0] (~m00k@184.76.254.130) |
10:29:20 | | Quit einhirn (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
10:44:19 | | Join way2strong [0] (~irssi@pool-96-255-251-244.washdc.fios.verizon.net) |
10:44:42 | | Part way2strong |
10:52:15 | | Quit kevku (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
11:00 |
11:00:13 | | Quit wodz (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
11:15:49 | | Quit nosa-j (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
11:15:58 | | Join wodz [0] (~wodz@iwl138.internetdsl.tpnet.pl) |
11:19:02 | | Join nosa-j [0] (~m00k@184.76.254.130) |
11:22:49 | | Join robin0800 [0] (~robin0800@cpc1-brig15-2-0-cust755.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com) |
11:42:40 | | Quit robin0800 (Quit: Leaving) |
11:46:10 | | Quit nosa-j (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
11:57:27 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
11:57:43 | | Join lorenzo92 [0] (~chatzilla@2a02:27e8:10:dc46:61f3:41e:3bc8:d383) |
12:00 |
12:04:58 | | Quit lorenzo92 (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
12:18:36 | | Join Scromple_ [0] (~Simon@161.43.73.67) |
12:20:33 | | Join lorenzo92 [0] (~chatzilla@host219-109-dynamic.10-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
12:20:35 | | Quit Scr0mple (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
12:31:07 | | Join Raptors_ [0] (~whoneedsa@198-200-68-213.cpe.distributel.net) |
12:31:07 | | Quit Raptors (Disconnected by services) |
12:31:23 | | Quit shamus (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
12:31:50 | | Join shamus [0] (~shmaus@ip-206-192-193-180.marylandheights.ip.cablemo.net) |
12:32:27 | | Join lebellium_ [0] (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
12:33:39 | | Quit lebellium (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
12:33:52 | | Nick lebellium_ is now known as lebellium (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
12:45:49 | | Quit Strife89 (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
13:00 |
13:09:32 | | Nick SuperBrainAK is now known as DormantBrain (~andy@2001:470:8:a61::5f92:59a1) |
13:40:00 | | Quit lorenzo92 (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
13:54:47 | soap | [Saint], buschel's patches for the 5th / 1stNano are still on the tracker, including extensive commentary as he tried each one, He. personally, was a strong proponent of running sub 30 and boosting as needed since his default playback "style" (musepak, no EQ) fit well into a sub 24Mhz envelope. |
13:55:55 | [Saint] | I am now looking into a POC of multiple boost levels. |
13:56:30 | [Saint] | I think it may be beneficial on some targets to only boost as much as required, on others, notsomuch. |
13:56:42 | soap | that has been discussed many times in the past and dismissed. What do you feel it offers over the current idea of Clock as low as possible and boost for as short of time as possible? |
13:57:22 | [Saint] | What it offers really depends on how power-efficient the given SoC is. |
13:57:30 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
13:57:37 | soap | The consensus has long been that boosting for N seconds at X speed is the equal in all but the most insignificant of digits to boost for 0.5N at 2X |
13:58:06 | soap | That unless you have fine grained voltage scaling... |
13:58:21 | [Saint] | Indeed. |
13:58:42 | soap | I can't speak for any SoC outside the PP ones, but there is (scattered) extensive power draw measurements both direct and indirect on this for them. |
14:00 |
14:00:21 | soap | Gotta remember for just how long the PP502x ate WAY too much battery while the 5G was the dominant player on the market. A metric asston of testing of all sorts was done on it trying to weasel out inches before the feet were finally cut out. |
14:00:46 | soap | Not to mention all the power consumption testing done while doing the dual-core work. |
14:00:55 | soap | excuse me. COP |
14:01:35 | [Saint] | Hahaha, yes. Co-processor...geeez man. :P |
14:03:19 | pamaury | One would need more data but it is unclear if multiple boost levels would bring anything. Power efficiency decreases very quickly with frequency and voltahe so it might be better to run at top speed for a short time and then go into very deep sleep, rather than staying at constant mid level |
14:07:04 | | Join cmhobbs [0] (~cmhobbs@fsf/member/cmhobbs) |
14:08:32 | wodz | not speaking it is easier scheme |
14:08:39 | wodz | *easiest |
14:13:14 | soap | and does any hardware outside the 5G have an inbuilt power-draw meter? |
14:14:18 | | Quit cmhobbs (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
14:20:37 | | Join cmhobbs [0] (~cmhobbs@ip70-178-52-92.ks.ks.cox.net) |
14:20:37 | | Quit cmhobbs (Changing host) |
14:20:37 | | Join cmhobbs [0] (~cmhobbs@fsf/member/cmhobbs) |
14:25:07 | [Saint] | soap: yep |
14:25:22 | * | [Saint] guesses this is the part where I say which |
14:25:27 | [Saint] | N2g does, iirc. |
14:28:44 | [Saint] | ...now, if only I was anywhere enar a charger. |
14:28:51 | [Saint] | *near, even. |
14:29:05 | [Saint] | I'm fairly cofident it does, though...fairly. |
14:31:33 | [Saint] | I'm sure there are other targetss, but I'm almost exclusively an iPod man these days, and all I use are my 5.5G, and my 6 & 7G, which is most of the reason why no other target in my proximity actually has any charge. |
14:39:02 | soap | ;) |
14:39:42 | | Quit mortalis (Quit: KVIrc 4.3.1 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/) |
14:40:27 | pamaury | I'm failrly sure most non-ipod targets don't have a power draw meter |
14:40:51 | | Join amayer [0] (~amayer@mail.weberadvertising.com) |
14:52:38 | | Join lorenzo92 [0] (~chatzilla@host219-109-dynamic.10-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
14:57:42 | | Quit michaelni (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
15:00 |
15:05:49 | | Quit soap (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
15:10:22 | | Join michaelni [0] (~michael@91-113-57-137.adsl.highway.telekom.at) |
15:18:19 | | Join soap [0] (~soap@rockbox/staff/soap) |
15:24:40 | | Quit wodz (Quit: Leaving) |
15:32:35 | | Join pamaury_ [0] (~quassel@rockbox/developer/pamaury) |
15:33:13 | | Quit pamaury (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
15:35:12 | | Quit pamaury_ (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
15:36:10 | | Quit amayer (Quit: Leaving) |
15:39:46 | | Join amayer [0] (~amayer@mail.weberadvertising.com) |
15:51:54 | | Quit lorenzo92 (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
15:57:34 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
16:00 |
16:10:54 | | Quit Zagor (Quit: Clint excited) |
16:24:14 | | Join pamaury [0] (~quassel@rockbox/developer/pamaury) |
16:41:16 | | Quit kugel (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
16:45:54 | | Part LinusN |
16:47:13 | amayer | I know we can put emCore + rockbox on iClassic 7G is this something we should put on our homepage? or is it just by happenstance that it works on 7G and we dont support it at all yet? |
16:54:38 | [Saint] | No, its definitely not something we want on the front page. |
16:54:54 | [Saint] | Doing so would imply it is supported, which it is not. |
16:55:53 | [Saint] | While somewhat intertwined, freemyipod and Rockbox are two seperate projects. |
16:56:42 | [Saint] | Enough people figure out the process now as it is to make things a headache sometimes. |
16:57:12 | copper | people who want to do it figure it out easy enough |
16:57:23 | copper | requires little googling |
16:57:43 | [Saint] | They don't seem to care that its two different projects, and that the port status is "unusable" (in no small part sue to the fact that thereis no officially supported installation procedure). |
16:58:22 | [Saint] | Advertising emCORE seems to me like the exact opposite of what is wanted presently. |
16:58:41 | [Saint] | Well, perhaps not the exact opposite, but definitely not "a good thing (TM)". |
16:59:32 | [Saint] | s/sue/due/ |
17:00 |
17:01:05 | [Saint] | At least the way things are currently gaurds somewhat against the completely technically challenged. |
17:03:13 | [Saint] | Another issue is places like HeadFi, Hydrogenaudio et al touting the port, complete with misleading and/or terribly worded, and/or outright wrong installation instructions, a fucktonne of "facts" about it, and unsupported binaries galore with who knows what changed in them because very few people understand GPL requirements or simply don't care. |
17:04:38 | [Saint] | Of course, no one is stopping anyone from crafting a Rockbox bootloader. |
17:05:07 | [Saint] | Automated installation on Windows is one of the real PITAs. |
17:07:32 | * | [Saint] is reasonably certain that a majority of persons related to both projects will agree with this |
17:09:12 | [Saint] | The tl;dr version is: "enough people use the port to supply competant testers, and more than enough people come to us seeking support for the port that they shouldn't technically be getting any support for whatsoever - as they can't (technically) install it in any Rockbox-blessed way" |
17:11:12 | amayer | [Saint]: I get what your saying but Rockbox can run on iClassic 7G correct? (as long as you supply bootloader. see: emCore) |
17:11:25 | lebellium | pamaury: are you only interested in porting Rockbox to some Sony players or do you also want to keep the players afterwards? |
17:11:26 | [Saint] | Everything a user needs to know about the iPod Classic in reference to Rockbox is already listed on the front page. |
17:11:38 | [Saint] | And, yes. I didn't realize this was in dispute? |
17:12:22 | amayer | it is not. im just wondering what the difference is that iClassic 6G is listed on the homepage but iClassic 7G is not |
17:12:37 | [Saint] | Its the same port, that's why. |
17:12:50 | gevaerts | amayer: I believe the basic issue is that whether there actually *is* a 7G is a point of contention :) |
17:13:01 | [Saint] | also, this ^ |
17:13:08 | gevaerts | (it's *very* similar to a 6G) |
17:13:50 | gevaerts | Oh well, I guess s@6G@6G/7G@ wouldn't hurt |
17:14:35 | [Saint] | If you had said "should we do s/Classic 6G/Classic 6-7G/ and left emCORE out of the conversation entirely I would've been able to follow what you were saying a bit easier. |
17:14:41 | amayer | [Saint]: gevaerts: thats what i was wondering. if they actually were different, and if 6G/7G should be listed together on the homepage |
17:14:43 | [Saint] | There's no harm in making that change. |
17:14:53 | [Saint] | But we should make no reference to emCORE, at all. |
17:15:26 | amayer | [Saint]: you are correct i should have asked my 2nd question instead of including emcore in it |
17:16:33 | [Saint] | I think the only reason it isn;t simply "Classic" is because most users seem to think that Classic == "any non-touch, non-nano iPod" which confuses things even further. :) |
17:17:22 | [Saint] | Between Apple's weird change with adding "Classic" to the iPods, and Wikipedia inventing a naming scheme out of the blue, it makes identification quite difficult. |
17:17:51 | | Join kevku [0] (~kevku@2001:0:c38c:c38c:3472:a3eb:3d69:be31) |
17:18:34 | [Saint] | There's iPod 1/2/3/4/5G, iPod Mini 1/2G, iPod Nano 1/2/3/4/5/6G, iPod Touch 1/2/3/4G, and then iPod Classic 6/7G. |
17:19:30 | gevaerts | [Saint]: you're forgetting the intermediate updates!~ |
17:19:40 | [Saint] | As you can see, with the 6/7G, it clearly is an extension of the "iPod" line...so, it really should just be "iPod 6/7G", *or* "iPod Classic 1/2G" |
17:19:42 | gevaerts | e.g. the 5.5G |
17:19:47 | [Saint] | ...but, they ...didn't. |
17:19:52 | [Saint] | For no reason I can fathom. |
17:19:54 | gevaerts | Also, IIUC there are *three* Classic revisions |
17:20:06 | [Saint] | the 6.5 is in contention afaik. |
17:20:16 | amayer | My iClassic 6G battery is only lasting ~2-3 hours after 6 years of VERY HEAVY use. and i was thinking about getting a new one. but im not sure if i can find a new 6G so if i get a 7G i just want to make sure i can rockbox it |
17:20:22 | [Saint] | (there's also a 6.5G Nano :) |
17:20:40 | [Saint] | amayer: yeah, sure. |
17:20:52 | [Saint] | I wouldn;t buy one, though. |
17:21:03 | [Saint] | I wouldn't ever buy a new iPod. |
17:21:16 | amayer | what other high volume(see: memory size) targets do we have? |
17:21:27 | amayer | i have 100Gb library I like to keep in my pocket |
17:21:42 | [Saint] | Buy a battery...much cheaper, and the older 160Gb "fat" Classic has a *MUCH* larger battery. |
17:22:04 | [Saint] | 850mAh vs 600mAh in the newer versions. |
17:22:20 | [Saint] | I would just buy a new battery, problem solved. |
17:22:22 | amayer | dont you have to saulder (sp?) the battery in? |
17:22:36 | amayer | (has not looked into this option) |
17:23:42 | [Saint] | Even if you wanted a Classic 76..I wouldn;t buy one new. |
17:23:53 | [Saint] | And, no. |
17:24:05 | [Saint] | 76? ha! 7G, rather. |
17:24:38 | [Saint] | And, several retailers are still selling Classic 6G new-in-box. |
17:24:45 | [Saint] | You don;t even have to look very hard for them. |
17:27:37 | [Saint] | amayer: www.youtube.com/v/q23MgRx_kTY will show you exactly how trivial it is. |
17:27:48 | [Saint] | (for both the thin and fat variants) |
17:28:16 | amayer | [Saint]: thanks :) it does seem pretty easy. |
17:28:21 | [Saint] | {you really want the fat version, though, IMO...all that sweet, sweet battery life!} |
17:28:58 | amayer | i have the 120Gb iClassic... not sure if that is fat or skinny |
17:29:16 | [Saint] | I get ~40 hours out of mine, and two of them have the original batteries in them. |
17:31:30 | [Saint] | wait...its 120GB? |
17:31:31 | amayer | so the battery option is a way better way to go |
17:31:36 | [Saint] | Then its not a 6G. |
17:31:47 | [Saint] | If its 120GB, its a 7G. |
17:32:02 | amayer | i thought 7G was only 160? |
17:32:11 | [Saint] | ...no, shit no. |
17:32:31 | [Saint] | 120/160GB. |
17:32:49 | copper | why not buy a new one? |
17:32:56 | amayer | *faceplam* really? |
17:32:58 | copper | 32 hours of battery life is plenty |
17:33:12 | [Saint] | copper: why buy a new one when the battery is the only issue? |
17:33:22 | amayer | copper: I just need a new battery |
17:33:34 | copper | can you disassemble it without breaking everything? |
17:33:37 | [Saint] | rather, why buy a complete device, when the old one can be made to run with ~430 expense vs several hundred? |
17:34:00 | [Saint] | *~$30 |
17:34:01 | copper | you need special tools I think |
17:34:05 | copper | from iFixIt |
17:34:06 | [Saint] | Naw... |
17:34:19 | [Saint] | They would like you to think so, because they are jerks. |
17:34:39 | copper | iPod Classics are notoriously difficult to disassemble |
17:34:45 | copper | or is that not true? |
17:35:04 | [Saint] | I love the way you stated that as fact, then immediately questioned it. :) |
17:35:12 | amayer | haha |
17:35:17 | [Saint] | *I* don't think its true... |
17:35:57 | copper | "they are notoriously" means "that's the word on the internet" |
17:36:04 | [Saint] | The 6G is basically a giant iPod Video, and the 7G is slightly more complicated, but disassembly is documented in many places. |
17:36:08 | copper | "The iPod Classic was offered in an 80 GB model for MSRP US$249 and a 160 GB model for MSRP US$349." |
17:36:14 | copper | "During the 'Let's Rock' Apple Event on September 9, 2008, the 80 GB and the thicker 160 GB model were discontinued in favor of a thin 120 GB version retailing for US$249." |
17:36:27 | copper | "During the event Apple re-introduced the 160 GB version with the same slim profile as the 120 GB version, retailing at US$249. The 120 GB model has now been dropped and the only option available is the 160 GB model." |
17:36:31 | amayer | [Saint]: what years where the 7Gs sold? I bought my iClassic new from walmart 7 years ago. |
17:36:35 | | Join Guest17648 [0] (~husvagn@90-230-140-28-no41.tbcn.telia.com) |
17:36:50 | copper | er, 2006? |
17:36:56 | [Saint] | 7 years?!? |
17:37:06 | [Saint] | that doesn;t seem to work out for either 6 or 7G |
17:37:17 | amayer | *thinks really hard* |
17:37:19 | [Saint] | Oh, whoops, math. Heh. |
17:37:43 | amayer | it was either 2006 or 2007 |
17:37:51 | amayer | I had it right at the end of highschool |
17:38:01 | copper | 120GB was released in 2008 |
17:38:14 | copper | september 2008 |
17:38:26 | * | [Saint] nods |
17:38:43 | copper | Wikipedia calls it "6G, 1st revision" |
17:38:54 | copper | latest is "6G, 2nd revision" |
17:38:58 | * | [Saint] shakes a fist at wikipedia |
17:39:01 | lebellium | http://build.rockbox.org/dev.cgi why is the Recorder always in red here? |
17:39:17 | amayer | was that 6G or 7G maybe i did buy it right after high school. but it would have been right after it came out. because i know i had it at the begining of college |
17:39:39 | copper | [Saint]: that's the best way to call it, really |
17:39:52 | [Saint] | lebellium: you do know the build results (and the reason why it failed) is printed there, yeah? |
17:40:07 | [Saint] | copper: "iPod 6G" |
17:40:14 | [Saint] | None of this Classic bullcrap. |
17:40:21 | copper | hmm? |
17:40:22 | [Saint] | Its clearly part of the iPod line. |
17:40:37 | copper | 6G is what apple calls the iPod Classic |
17:40:49 | [Saint] | it shoudl either be "iPod 6G" or "iPod Classic 1G". |
17:40:51 | lebellium | [Saint]: yes but it says "make: *** [/home/bryan/source/rockbox/build-archosrecorder/ajbrec.ajz] Error 255 |
17:40:53 | lebellium | Build Failure: No 'rockbox.zip' was produced. " . I don't really understand since http://build.rockbox.org/data/rockbox-archosrecorder.zip seems to work |
17:40:55 | [Saint] | as I stated about 30 minutes ago. |
17:41:17 | [Saint] | lebellium: see slightly above that, the error is quite clear. |
17:41:26 | [Saint] | the binary is oversized, it has been for ages. |
17:42:12 | | Join Strife89 [0] (~Strife89@2602:306:250c:61d9:71ca:f790:a61f:edb5) |
17:42:20 | lebellium | How can it be both oversized and working? |
17:42:34 | [Saint] | "[03:18] <[Saint]> There's iPod 1/2/3/4/5G, iPod Mini 1/2G, iPod Nano 1/2/3/4/5/6G, iPod Touch 1/2/3/4G, and then iPod Classic 6/7G. [03:19] <[Saint]> As you can see, with the 6/7G, it clearly is an extension of the "iPod" line...so, it really should just be "iPod 6/7G", *or* "iPod Classic 1/2G"" |
17:42:36 | [Saint] | copper ^ |
17:43:00 | [Saint] | That's my reasoning, and its perfectly sound IMO. There was nothing to gain except confusion with what they did. |
17:43:05 | copper | [Saint]: except the "G" (generation) doesn't mean the same thing with iPods before and after the Classic |
17:43:20 | [Saint] | It means even less now. |
17:43:24 | copper | or, just call them by year, I don'tk now |
17:43:41 | [Saint] | a product *starts* at its sixth iteration? ...pfffft! |
17:43:56 | copper | what about the iPod Video and iPod Photo |
17:44:14 | copper | dat shit didn't start with the "Classic" |
17:44:14 | [Saint] | 5G and 4G respectively. |
17:45:47 | [Saint] | lebellium: my guess is "sheer chance". |
17:46:01 | copper | iMacs and Macbooks are called by their year |
17:46:05 | | Join saratoga [0] (123e11e0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.18.62.17.224) |
17:46:11 | saratoga | anyone feel like benchmarking the new compressor improvements on PP? |
17:46:21 | saratoga | assuming performance is fine i think that patch can go in |
17:46:23 | [Saint] | I don't own the target, so I don;t know, all I do know is that the binary has been oversized for an age. |
17:46:44 | amayer | http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1353#iPod_classic_120GB on this page it lists the 120Gb ipod as its own device... so its not grouped with the generation before (im guessing 3 products lower) or the next gen (4 products up) |
17:46:46 | [Saint] | saratoga: you mean the "open the compressor"+ attack time? |
17:47:08 | saratoga | yeah this |
17:47:09 | saratoga | http://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/#/c/626/ |
17:47:22 | saratoga | the patch looks like good work, maybe we ought to give that guy git access as well |
17:47:43 | [Saint] | saratoga: I'm actually using it now, but I have too many other patches in my tree to provide an accurate bench. |
17:47:51 | saratoga | i'm in favor of anyone willing to jump into the dsp code as a first project :) |
17:47:57 | saratoga | on PP? |
17:48:15 | [Saint] | It is good work, too, barring some whitespace and a single comment I didn;t like the look of for purely aesthetic reasons. :) |
17:48:19 | [Saint] | ANd yes, on PP. |
17:48:38 | saratoga | if you have test_codec enabled, you could just play any track with and without DSP effects |
17:48:56 | saratoga | i don't really care about other patches or overclocking, just what the difference is with it enabled or disabled |
17:49:02 | [Saint] | AH. I forgot about that. |
17:49:11 | saratoga | just want to make sure it runs fine |
17:49:18 | saratoga | or else we can ifdef it on slower devices |
17:49:28 | [Saint] | Awwww...fuck it. my test_codec is an ancient leftover, apparently. |
17:49:43 | [Saint] | I'll get it done and comment on the tracker when I can. |
17:49:46 | saratoga | cool |
17:49:59 | [Saint] | I wanted to give that guy an "attaboy" for his work too. |
17:49:59 | saratoga | i want to make an effort to test things on PP to make sure we keep it running well |
17:50:20 | [Saint] | Like you said, he really jumped in deep, on a first try (for this project), and did it well. |
17:50:24 | saratoga | also, has anyone seen bagder or zagor in a while? |
17:50:35 | [Saint] | Not me personally. |
17:50:50 | [Saint] | I have seen Zagor in community in the past few days. |
17:51:04 | [Saint] | I can't remember the last time I say Bagder active though. |
17:51:18 | [Saint] | *saw |
17:52:13 | saratoga | i'll email |
17:52:41 | [Saint] | I have to admit, when I read the "compressor sound 'more open'" (or similar) I thought "...awwww, here we go, some audiophile airy-fairy subjective wankery". |
17:52:47 | [Saint] | Imagine my surprise. |
17:53:00 | pamaury | lebellium: it's better if I can keep the players, to debug them in case of problem |
17:53:37 | | Join clau [0] (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
17:53:38 | saratoga | yeah i don't think the old compressor was all that high quality |
17:54:01 | | Nick clau is now known as Guest62057 (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
17:54:02 | | Nick Guest62057 is now known as claudior (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
17:54:09 | [Saint] | I am actually glad you noticed this patch. |
17:54:33 | [Saint] | I had no plans to do so tonight, but I was going to go looking for you tomorrow and prod you if you hadn't seen it. |
17:54:49 | saratoga | also who runs the gerrit tracker? we need to set it so that sandbox projects don't show on the front page |
17:55:04 | [Saint] | I have you mentally tagged as "DSP guy" I guess. |
17:55:21 | [Saint] | Sorry, "DSP and optimization guy" |
17:55:24 | [Saint] | :) |
17:55:41 | amayer | [Saint]: have you ever ordered a battery before? if so where did you get it from? |
17:56:15 | [Saint] | I haven't ever ordered one online, no. |
17:56:46 | | Quit akaWolf (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
17:57:01 | lebellium | pamaury: ok I could lend you my S540 and S615 but I don't really want to gift them as they are part of my collection. If you want to keep the players, then better buy them with the Rockbox fund I think. I could make a small paypal donation for that if needed. |
17:57:02 | [Saint] | I have a wholesaler and fabricator of various cell technology right around the corner (well, 15 mins or so away) keeping me in supply of batteries. |
17:57:02 | saratoga | yeah, although jhmikes actually does most of the effects stuff |
17:57:06 | saratoga | i did more codecs |
17:57:22 | [Saint] | Right, but I see you more often. :) |
17:57:28 | | Join akaWolf [0] (~akaWolf@unaffiliated/akawolf) |
17:57:35 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
17:58:15 | pamaury | lebellium: give me some time before, I'm trying to find them at good prices on leboncoin, I might be able to get a very cheap E440 very soon and I spotted a S540 |
17:58:24 | pamaury | and I have a lot of work anyway so I'm not in a hurry |
17:58:55 | [Saint] | IS it "normal" for bass to sound "flat" with replaygain active, and if so, how does one combat this without negating the effects of replagain? |
17:58:59 | [Saint] | saratoga: ^ |
17:59:20 | [Saint] | I have a sense there's something I'm missing that I should be using in conjunction with replaygain. |
17:59:28 | claudior | i asked samsung |
17:59:32 | saratoga | its probably just quieter |
17:59:38 | claudior | to release source of ypq3 player |
17:59:50 | claudior | ther response me: not gpl |
17:59:52 | claudior | T_T |
17:59:54 | lebellium | pamaury: no problem :) I'm afraid the E440 is very close to E360 and would cause the same impendance issues with my UM3x unfortunately :S |
17:59:59 | saratoga | usually replaygain ends up 5-10 dB quieter, which will tend to make the bass much less pronounced |
18:00 |
18:00:02 | lebellium | claudior: I already asked in the past ;) |
18:00:13 | [Saint] | saratoga: I added as much pre-amp as the worst case scenarios negative gain, but it still sounds "flat". |
18:00:16 | [Saint] | But only the bass. |
18:00:31 | saratoga | its just a volume adjustment, so i don't know what would cause that |
18:00:32 | claudior | now with lorenzomiori we are work to reverse fw |
18:01:05 | saratoga | i'd recommend using analog gain (that is, the actual volume control), usually you get some clipping if you try to run replaygain at 0dB |
18:01:11 | saratoga | via preamp |
18:01:25 | saratoga | although depending on the music style there is a good chance it wouldn't be noticable |
18:01:40 | saratoga | the audibility of such things is controversial on HA |
18:01:53 | [Saint] | saratoga: I must admit I haven't ABXed it, but switching back and forth between replaygain and no, it really seems to me like the bass bottoms out. |
18:02:27 | saratoga | perception of bass is highly volume dependent, so i tend to think its just that the levels aren't the same |
18:02:57 | [Saint] | Perhaps I am imagining it. There's every chance. I just wanted to ask to see if this percieved effect was "normal" or not. |
18:03:05 | claudior | lebellium |
18:03:46 | [Saint] | It is strange (to me) that when I apply as much pre-amp as there is negative track gain, it doesn't "sound right", or the same to me, as it does with replaygain off. |
18:04:41 | saratoga | its possible theres some additional gain thats applied for some reason |
18:04:58 | saratoga | i don't think replaygain would do that, but maybe the EQ adds a bit of negative gain silently? |
18:05:04 | claudior | where samsung say firmware not gpl |
18:05:10 | saratoga | you'd have to ask jhmikes about that or i guess test with test_codec |
18:05:15 | [Saint] | I was just curious if this was a known effect, real or not, I guess the next step is seeing whether or not I can reliably ABX replaygain and replaygain+pre amp where pre amp is equivalent to the gain applied. |
18:05:49 | saratoga | i think test_codec can write out the actual audio to wav files, so you could check it in an audio editor and see if theres some difference |
18:05:56 | saratoga | with and without replaygain |
18:06:11 | [Saint] | Ahhh, thanks, I wasn't aware it could do so. |
18:06:12 | lebellium | claudior: I asked last year and they replied: "We are publishing product's source code which is covered under GPL, LGPL or MPL. But there's no source code covered under these licenses in the YP-Q3. " |
18:06:54 | claudior | so ypq3 is closed source? |
18:07:26 | [Saint] | "no source code covered under these licenses" certainly suggests so. |
18:07:46 | claudior | ç_ç |
18:07:56 | lebellium | That's what I understand here. That may be a lie, but we have no way to verify it, they can claim what they want :) |
18:08:23 | claudior | lebellium you saw q3 page on wiki? |
18:08:46 | claudior | some information i wrote are taken from ABI |
18:08:46 | [Saint] | Show it to pamaury, devices disassemble their own firmware in fear when he's around. |
18:08:47 | [Saint] | :P |
18:09:12 | lebellium | claudior: Yes. I'm closely working with lorenzo for some years so I'm always aware of what's going on with Samsung + Rockbox :) |
18:09:32 | pamaury | YP-Q3 is TCC7901 based iirc ? |
18:09:48 | claudior | as you can read on wiki |
18:09:57 | [Saint] | pamaury: I believe so, yes. |
18:10:08 | [Saint] | So, bricking shouldn;t be a fear, that's a plus. |
18:10:40 | lebellium | claudior: check here if there are no additionnal useful info about Q3 hardware: http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/9149/8hr0.jpg |
18:10:43 | fs-bluebot | Gerrit review #163 at http://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/163 : Manual: Fix the WPS tags table by Alexander Levin (changes/63/163/1) |
18:10:45 | fs-bluebot | Gerrit review #163 at http://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/163 : Manual: Fix the WPS tags table by Alexander Levin (changes/63/163/1) |
18:10:48 | pamaury | some guy (KotH ?) is working on D20 which is also TCC7901 based |
18:10:57 | * | [Saint] prods bluebrother^ |
18:11:21 | pamaury | I'm working on porting hwstub to the TCC so it's easier to hack on them |
18:11:22 | [Saint] | (if you don't feel like doing it, can you show me the source so I can kick fs-bluebot's ass a bit?) |
18:11:26 | [Saint] | bluebrother^: ^ |
18:11:31 | claudior | lebellium where you found it? |
18:11:32 | claudior | o.o |
18:11:47 | claudior | brb wiki and come back |
18:11:58 | saratoga | there are a number of new imx devices right? are any besides the Fuze+ relatively usable? |
18:12:08 | saratoga | i suppose a Creative player? |
18:12:23 | | Quit copper (Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in) |
18:12:52 | lebellium | claudior: As an insider I often got confidential documents from Samsung but for this one, it's a leak on a Chinese forum |
18:13:10 | pamaury | saratoga: zenxfi3 is very usable (except radio) |
18:13:28 | saratoga | can we mark it unstable? |
18:13:32 | pamaury | zenxfi2 so so, sony nwz-E360/E370 are on good rail |
18:13:39 | pamaury | clearly yes |
18:14:13 | pamaury | I'm working on a few Creative players. The code is stable but the biggest issue it installation and dual-boot, which I'm working on it |
18:14:39 | saratoga | right now you need to use linux or else download a prepatched firmware? |
18:14:59 | claudior | im adding it on wiki, check out if i miss something |
18:16:09 | lebellium | claudior: to avoid dead links, you should attach documentation to the wiki page I think |
18:16:18 | pamaury | saratoga: in theory we have both windows and linux support to update the firmware, but it's not supported by rbutil |
18:16:33 | saratoga | is there a command line tool? |
18:16:41 | pamaury | that's a command line too yeah |
18:17:09 | pamaury | The main issue is the filesystem: creative uses its own filesystem so at the moment you need to trash creative FS to use rockbox |
18:17:16 | claudior | can i attach that image you post? |
18:17:30 | pamaury | but I may have found a way to solve this issue |
18:18:28 | lebellium | claudior: other people here are more aware of what is allowed or not than I am but if that's allowed, you should attach the RAM datasheets for example |
18:18:50 | lebellium | we never know if the download link will be still working in a few months or years |
18:19:23 | pamaury | yeah attaching the datasheets is always a better idea |
18:19:29 | KotH | pamaury: working is a bit too strong of a word ^^' |
18:19:43 | claudior | but i can attach your schematich photo? |
18:19:43 | pamaury | thinking about it ;) |
18:19:44 | saratoga | fwiw i don't care if we kill the creative firmware :) |
18:19:47 | KotH | pamaury: i'm swamped with work atm, so no time for RB :-( |
18:19:57 | | Join bertrik [0] (~quassel@rockbox/developer/bertrik) |
18:20:25 | lebellium | claudior: It's a leak on a chinese website so I don't see any issue with attaching it, we're not responsible for the leak :) |
18:20:37 | claudior | k |
18:20:57 | saratoga | oh did someone still need tcc datasheets btw? |
18:20:58 | claudior | can you link me the source? |
18:21:32 | pamaury | saratoga: I personally agree but I still think it's better to be able to dualboot, and as a matter of fact the OF won't boot with a trashed partition (although the recovery mode will of course) |
18:23:31 | lebellium | claudior: I downloaded the pic to my computer a long time ago, it was in a thread somewhere here bbs.imp3.net/forum-23-1.html |
18:25:54 | | Quit derf (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
18:26:30 | | Join derf [0] (~derf@fuzzyneural.net) |
18:28:00 | lebellium | claudior: I might buy the YP-Q3 service manual for $10 but not sure it's worth it. I did it for the YP-R1 at the time, if you want to see how it looks like: http://www.anythingbutipod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=71554 |
18:29:40 | pamaury | if it contains the full schematics I would say it's worth it |
18:29:48 | pamaury | otherwise no |
18:30:06 | claudior | :Q____ |
18:30:26 | | Quit Maxdamantus (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
18:30:53 | | Join lorenzo92 [0] (~chatzilla@host157-25-dynamic.21-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
18:31:04 | lebellium | It would probably look like the YP-R1 one. So just look at the R1 service manual to have an idea. I'm not sure lorenzo92 really used it for the YP-R1 port |
18:31:23 | saratoga | i think service manuals rarely have much detail in them |
18:31:37 | lorenzo92 | lebellium: regarding what? |
18:31:42 | saratoga | or at least i haven't seen an mp3 player one with pin assignments (although that would be very useful) |
18:31:43 | claudior | ciao! |
18:31:45 | lebellium | lorenzo92: logs ;) |
18:31:49 | lorenzo92 | okay |
18:32:14 | | Join copper [0] (~copper@unaffiliated/copper) |
18:32:33 | | Join Maxdamantus [0] (~Maxdamant@2001:470:f078::dead:beef:cafe) |
18:32:41 | pamaury | saratoga: the YP-Z5F manual has the schematics |
18:32:52 | pamaury | the YP-Q1 too |
18:34:04 | claudior | where we can find service manual |
18:34:11 | lorenzo92 | well indeed they are a lot helpful: complete schematics! |
18:34:32 | lebellium | claudior: I put a link to the ABI thread above... |
18:34:46 | lebellium | lorenzo92: did you use it for the YP-R1? |
18:34:53 | lorenzo92 | claudior: I don't have much time these days, anyways firmware (the .ROM file) is in a known format |
18:35:13 | lorenzo92 | lebellium: not really, just to look at some design choices :D |
18:35:33 | claudior | lebellium where find q3 manual |
18:35:48 | lorenzo92 | you cannot if there is no clue in the net basically :) |
18:35:53 | lebellium | claudior: You won't find it for free, unless I buy it ;) |
18:36:08 | claudior | where you buy? |
18:36:14 | lorenzo92 | lebellium, claudior: having the schematics isn't the key to success |
18:36:45 | lebellium | Ok, then I'll save my money :) |
18:36:52 | claudior | BRB |
18:36:56 | lorenzo92 | claudior: we shall starting dissassembling the OF to look at LCD initialization steps |
18:37:28 | lorenzo92 | i might help you a little, |
18:39:43 | claudior | :) |
18:39:48 | lorenzo92 | lebellium: well for the moment for sure, to say, the schematic didn't help me at all writing LCD driver, pamaury did :D |
18:39:49 | claudior | lorenzo |
18:40:12 | lorenzo92 | claudior: please use my nickname, so that I receive notifications! |
18:40:54 | claudior | lebellium brought us this-> http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/9149/8hr0.jpg |
18:40:57 | fs-bluebot | Gerrit review #163 at http://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/163 : Manual: Fix the WPS tags table by Alexander Levin (changes/63/163/1) |
18:40:59 | fs-bluebot | Gerrit review #163 at http://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/163 : Manual: Fix the WPS tags table by Alexander Levin (changes/63/163/1) |
18:41:19 | lorenzo92 | Houston, we have a problem! bluebot! xD |
18:41:55 | pamaury | I'll see if I can get my hands on a YP-Q3, I'm actively looking for a TCC7901 based device and that one is the only cheap and easily available I know |
18:42:12 | lorenzo92 | claudior: interesting, I'm looking at the small eeprom: might it be something for booting?! |
18:42:27 | | Quit claudior (Quit: CGI:IRC) |
18:42:50 | | Join claudior [0] (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
18:42:55 | claudior | dmn |
18:42:57 | lorenzo92 | lebellium, claudior: we have a lot of information in here actually :) |
18:43:09 | claudior | i have dubt |
18:43:16 | lorenzo92 | at least we know the backlight driver and we could start with it for example |
18:43:21 | claudior | nand dont seems the sam of photo |
18:44:15 | pamaury | lorenzo92: I still haven't given up on making hwstub working on tcc too, that would greatly help you I think |
18:44:35 | | Join rdn [0] (~oop@cpe-69-204-124-212.buffalo.res.rr.com) |
18:44:53 | claudior | lebellium you have other leak of q3? |
18:45:02 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: interesting, but I'm not going to have a TCC device soon (I have other stuff to complete before) |
18:45:21 | claudior | pamaury i have q3 |
18:46:39 | claudior | lorenzo92 you keep work on fw in those day i was away? |
18:46:51 | claudior | (my english still suck xD) |
18:48:06 | | Quit Raptors_ (Quit: Leaving) |
18:48:16 | lorenzo92 | not really, the format is really easy to understand but what I don't understand is their logic (i'm talking about the .BIN format, that is, a container for bot .ROM and .RSC) |
18:48:34 | lorenzo92 | said that, we need to understand .ROM, .RSC isn't our important stuff |
18:48:58 | pamaury | we have the format for .ROM, that's the telechips format |
18:49:01 | lorenzo92 | again, .ROM file is a standard TCC firmware, so the only thing we can start is disassembling it |
18:49:31 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: exactly, but I fed it to IDA and I was already able to look at the code: did I do the right thing? |
18:50:28 | pamaury | I think so |
18:51:07 | lorenzo92 | i think so too, because I could follow some registers :) |
18:52:12 | claudior | just updated q3 wiki page |
18:52:16 | claudior | http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/SamsungQ3 |
18:52:18 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: I'm wondering how to cleanly start a thread in system_init (kernel_init happens after) |
18:52:42 | lorenzo92 | I've my logic in system because it's the right place on hosted platform, I guess |
18:53:36 | lorenzo92 | (I've spent an hour to realize this :D ) |
18:53:46 | lorenzo92 | because it throws segmentation fault |
18:54:11 | pamaury | you cannot do this in system_init I think, why do you need a thread for ? |
18:54:18 | pamaury | *what |
18:54:32 | lorenzo92 | inotify |
18:55:29 | lorenzo92 | I wrote a simple subsystem, to be able to detect in an optimized way the insertion/removal of the sd card on ypr0 |
18:56:07 | pamaury | can't you start it on storage init ? |
18:56:39 | pamaury | ah maybe not, I don't know how hosted targets work |
18:56:52 | pamaury | maybe you should see this with kugel |
18:57:14 | lorenzo92 | well main.c does call storage_init, but i guess is a void somewhere...let me give a look |
18:58:35 | pamaury | my guess is that you should start it in some init function which is called after kernel_init(), there must be some which are target specific |
18:59:01 | pamaury | like power_init() ? |
18:59:08 | claudior | afk |
18:59:18 | | Nick claudior is now known as claudior_ (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
19:00 |
19:00:05 | [Saint] | "[04:35] <lebellium> claudior: You won't find it for free, unless I buy it ;)" <−− I wouldn't say that... |
19:00:30 | [Saint] | I found quite a few of the service manuals listed on your linked thread freely available. |
19:00:38 | [Saint] | Including the YP-R1's. |
19:01:18 | [Saint] | It may be more accurate to say "It could potentially be very difficult to find it from a free source" |
19:01:32 | [Saint] | But far from impossible. |
19:01:38 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: indeed, but I need to see how to use them i.e. some are void-ed somewhere I guess |
19:07:57 | lebellium | [Saint]: I only bought the YP-R1 one, I found all the others for free but not necessarily easily. I know which ones can be found for free and which ones can't :) |
19:08:20 | [Saint] | Well, apparently not :) |
19:08:31 | lebellium | If you can show me where to find the YP-R1 for free, I'm interested though :) |
19:20:10 | | Join pretty_function [0] (~sigBART@123.252.214.116) |
19:23:26 | [Saint] | Errr, um...shit. Sorry, didn't see your response 'til now. I'll have a look through my history and you can tell me if its legit or not. |
19:25:19 | [Saint] | lebellium: http://www.datafilehost.com/d/eb916c29 <−− this is it, I believe. |
19:25:38 | [Saint] | I can't find the page that lead me there...but, its definitely out there. |
19:26:04 | lebellium | this is obviously a reupload from mine :) |
19:26:17 | [Saint] | from 2010? |
19:27:09 | [Saint] | I suppose anything is possible. |
19:28:35 | | Quit claudior_ (Quit: CGI:IRC) |
19:28:52 | | Join claudior [0] (~974a65f1@www.haxx.se) |
19:29:31 | lebellium | well, I can't be sure since Kaspersky tells me it's dangerous and won't let me download the file but the file name is strangly the same as I used when renaming all the services manuals. All the ones I downloaded for free always had long/strange/unclear file names |
19:30:32 | [Saint] | Heh, yeah, Kapersky doesn't like .pdf files on teh infowebs. |
19:31:01 | [Saint] | WHen did you put the links up on that forum thread? It is highly possible someone re-uploaded it from there. |
19:31:23 | [Saint] | I found it by looking for the filename you list there. |
19:32:03 | lebellium | I may be wrong if you are sure it has been uploaded in 2010. But if you are not sure about that, then the probability that it's a reupload from mine is high. it's exactly the same file with the same filename as mine but I renamed it. The original one I bought had a different file name :) |
19:32:08 | [Saint] | I really need to stop using incognito mode/private browsing so I actually have a history and can tell where things come from. |
19:33:17 | [Saint] | the data last modified is Fri, Aug 13 2010 05:11:08 |
19:35:05 | lebellium | So either the date here is wrong, or the guy who uploaded it had exactly the same file name scheme in mind as me, that's almost telepathy :D |
19:35:07 | claudior | lebellium where you buy service manual? |
19:35:57 | [Saint] | lebellium: maybe you have multiple personality disorder and one of your alternate personas uploaded it. :) |
19:36:25 | | Join lorenzo92_ [0] (~chatzilla@host157-25-dynamic.21-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
19:37:06 | lebellium | claudior: I just google and look if the website looks trusty or not. Well no one looks really trusty... I hate that service manual business :) |
19:37:39 | lebellium | for the Q3: http://www.service-docs.com/store/search.php?searchstring=SAMSUNG%20YP-Q3AB&showresult=true&exp=&resultpage=&categories=&msg=&search=search.php&shop=1 |
19:38:10 | [Saint] | Hahaha, I was going to say. |
19:38:26 | [Saint] | I haven't yet seen a service manual or datasheet vendor that looks "trustworthy". |
19:38:35 | [Saint] | They all seem to look like phishing scams. :) |
19:42:49 | claudior | is legal manual business? |
19:43:48 | lebellium | I'm not sure exactly how this busines works but I suspect those vendors to buy it on official/authorized websites at a high price (for example http://www.samsungparts.com) then resell it cheaper but to more people |
19:44:30 | | Join dv__ [0] (~quassel@chello080108009040.14.11.vie.surfer.at) |
19:45:26 | | Quit dv_ (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
19:46:00 | [Saint] | claudior: in most cases, no. |
19:46:33 | [Saint] | Generally speaking purchasing a datasheet or technical manual licenses you and you alone to view it. |
19:46:55 | [Saint] | SOme are more permissive, but those are the ones you'll find floating around for free. |
19:47:07 | [Saint] | (generally speaking - there are certainly edge cases) |
19:55:15 | lebellium | pamaury: I'm looking a bit at the settings on the E360 and I see that for the brightness, the display is black/off from level 16. Looks like levels from 0 to 15 are useless? |
19:55:50 | | Quit Strife89 (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
19:56:36 | pamaury | yeah I noticed this, this is surprising since it's a pwm; i'll need set the minimum to 16 |
19:57:36 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
19:57:44 | | Quit lebellium (Read error: No route to host) |
19:58:14 | | Join lebellium [0] (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
19:59:23 | lebellium | hum ok, so for example it's not possible to add additionnal steps between level 16 and 17? |
20:00 |
20:00:33 | pamaury | maybe, is there a big step ? |
20:01:07 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: can you set pwm frequency? in case you can be pretty flexible i guess |
20:02:02 | pamaury | yeah of course, but I thought 100 steps in already good enough |
20:02:19 | lebellium | pamaury: well I find it very progressive from 100 to 17 then suddendly it turns off at 16 |
20:02:27 | lorenzo92 | haha 100 steps :D |
20:04:56 | pamaury | ok i'll see what I can do |
20:06:18 | pamaury | that's rather low priority though :p |
20:06:26 | lebellium | sure :) |
20:06:34 | lebellium | keymapping is higher priority :P |
20:08:25 | * | pamaury wonders if there are backlight-phile, who feel that backlight is more "cold" at 10KHz and more "colourful" at 1MHz ^^ |
20:09:25 | bertrik | nah, PWM is too digital |
20:09:31 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: absolutely :p |
20:10:30 | pamaury | I understand them in a way, display is definitely cold when it's off and colourful when it's on :D |
20:11:55 | | Join patto [0] (~589c2296@www.haxx.se) |
20:12:11 | pamaury | bertrik: you're right, good old oled, nothing better than organic light |
20:13:21 | | Join rela [0] (~x@pdpc/supporter/active/rela) |
20:20:14 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: doubt for you: can I reference via a pointer a static function? |
20:22:08 | lorenzo92 | apparently that was not my problem :) |
20:23:46 | patto | helo, maybe you may help me, I have sansa cli zip and i just change theme, and the player is working but theres nothing on the screen |
20:24:10 | patto | so I dont have access to the menu etc |
20:24:28 | patto | how to reset theme to default one |
20:24:51 | patto | I have access to the files on the player from pc |
20:25:26 | [Saint] | pamaury: but, you have to make sure that your PWM is free range, too. |
20:25:37 | [Saint] | The PWMs kept in cages produce sad light. |
20:26:07 | patto | there is config.cfg file |
20:26:15 | [Saint] | patto: remove config.cfg |
20:26:44 | [Saint] | you can also edit it and remove the (rather obvious) theme ralated settings, as well. |
20:26:51 | bertrik | lorenzo92: yes, pointer to static functions should work fine |
20:27:25 | pamaury | definitely, that's why PWM stands for Pulsed Wild Monster |
20:27:39 | [Saint] | pamaury: Hahaha. :) |
20:27:39 | patto | you mean: |
20:27:44 | patto | fms: /.rockbox/wps/ti83.fms font: /.rockbox/fonts/08-ti83.fnt wps: /.rockbox/wps/ti83.wps sbs: /.rockbox/wps/ti83.sbs backdrop: /.rockbox/wps/wp7style/bg.bmp |
20:27:47 | patto | ? |
20:27:56 | [Saint] | I do indeed. |
20:28:22 | | Quit Kohlrabi (Remote host closed the connection) |
20:29:15 | [Saint] | Hahahaha. My iLike theme must be pretty convincing. |
20:29:38 | | Join Kohlrabi [0] (~kohlrabi@kohlio.de) |
20:29:38 | [Saint] | Ms [Saint] just SMS me from work saying that her co-workers only just now noticed that the iPod was "different". |
20:29:39 | patto | Saint: it worked! :) Thank you! |
20:29:42 | [Saint] | After 4 months. |
20:29:49 | [Saint] | patto: No problem. |
20:31:17 | lorenzo92 | hum I'm having an issue with threading on hosted: is it normal that a blocking read() blocks all the other threads? is the scheduler okay? |
20:31:21 | [Saint] | I needed to make a fixed.cfg file with pretty much every setting located therein as people other than Ms [Saint] had been poking at things they didn't understand. |
20:31:28 | | Quit patto (Quit: CGI:IRC) |
20:32:08 | [Saint] | I had previously forgotten about fixed.cfg, it is so handy. |
20:32:46 | [Saint] | I used to use it primarily to set a sane listening volume so I didn;t accidentally blow my ears off if I had been listening via the car stereo at 0dB or so. |
20:33:12 | [Saint] | Now I'm using it to apply pretty much every setting at boot time. |
20:38:25 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: do you know anything about threads and blocking calls? |
20:39:05 | pamaury | in rockbox you mean ? |
20:39:10 | pamaury | not so much |
20:41:15 | | Quit lorenzo92_ (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
20:43:56 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: yep, because a blocking call should not block other threads humhum |
20:47:55 | lorenzo92 | perhaps because I'm using a system call actually (read a file) ? |
20:51:08 | | Quit rela (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
20:52:59 | pamaury | lorenzo92: native or hosted ? |
20:53:16 | lorenzo92 | pamaury: hosted, so i assume it is a yes... |
20:54:29 | pamaury | i don't know how hosted is implemented, might be, ask kugel, i think he was the last one to touch it |
20:56:23 | [Saint] | s/last/pretty much the only/ :) |
21:00 |
21:03:34 | | Quit dfkt (Disconnected by services) |
21:03:35 | | Join dfkt_ [0] (dfkt@unaffiliated/dfkt) |
21:09:52 | | Quit DexterLB (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
21:10:06 | | Quit habys (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
21:10:18 | | Quit lorenzo92 (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
21:11:06 | | Join habys [0] (~luke@arikui.org) |
21:16:41 | | Join DexterLB [0] (~dex@87-126-18-212.btc-net.bg) |
21:21:12 | | Quit DexterLB (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
21:23:01 | | Quit habys (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
21:25:28 | | Join habys [0] (~luke@arikui.org) |
21:34:29 | | Join lebellium_ [0] (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
21:35:49 | | Quit lebellium (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
21:35:58 | | Nick lebellium_ is now known as lebellium (~chatzilla@lns-c10k-ld-02-m-212-194-176-149.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr) |
21:43:28 | | Quit pretty_function (Remote host closed the connection) |
21:51:42 | claudior | bye |
21:51:44 | | Quit claudior (Quit: CGI:IRC) |
21:53:40 | | Nick dv__ is now known as dv_ (~quassel@chello080108009040.14.11.vie.surfer.at) |
21:57:38 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
21:58:38 | | Quit dv_ (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
22:00 |
22:00:14 | | Join dv_ [0] (~quassel@chello080108009040.14.11.vie.surfer.at) |
22:02:46 | | Quit kevku (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
22:21:28 | | Nick DormantBrain is now known as SuperBrainAK (~andy@2001:470:8:a61::5f92:59a1) |
22:34:37 | | Join bluebrother [0] (~dom@rockbox/developer/bluebrother) |
22:37:46 | | Quit bluebrother^ (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
22:38:01 | | Quit fs-bluebot (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
22:39:30 | | Join fs-bluebot [0] (~fs-bluebo@g226068246.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
22:47:05 | | Quit amayer (Quit: Leaving) |
23:00 |
23:51:30 | | Quit Zambezi (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
23:52:02 | | Join Zambezi_ [0] (Zulu@bnc.fran.hostbay.nu) |
23:52:02 | | Join advcomp2019_ [0] (~advcomp20@65-131-164-27.sxct.qwest.net) |
23:52:02 | | Quit advcomp2019_ (Changing host) |
23:52:02 | | Join advcomp2019_ [0] (~advcomp20@unaffiliated/advcomp2019) |
23:52:02 | | Quit Hadaka_ (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
23:52:09 | | Quit scorche (Disconnected by services) |
23:52:13 | | Join scorche` [0] (~scorche@rockbox/administrator/scorche) |
23:53:14 | | Join Hadaka [0] (~naked@naked.iki.fi) |
23:54:59 | | Quit advcomp2019 (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
23:57:40 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |