00:20:13 | | Join jacobk [0] (~quassel@utdpat241105.utdallas.edu) |
00:36:06 | | Quit massiveH (Quit: Leaving) |
00:53:28 | | Quit jacobk (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
01:00 |
01:16:12 | _bilgus | awesome :) hope it goes well |
01:17:13 | _bilgus | chris_s I abandoned the list based YesNo dialog because it was nearly +1k and not that much better IMO |
01:18:02 | _bilgus | but that led me to investigate the scrolling lines issue and its a off by one bug I do believe |
01:19:01 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
01:30:32 | | Join jacobk [0] (~quassel@64.189.201.150) |
02:00 |
02:12:07 | _bilgus | g#5525 |
02:12:10 | rb-bluebot | Gerrit review #5525 at https://gerrit.rockbox.org/r/c/rockbox/+/5525 : [BugFix] scroll_stop_viewport_rect off by 1, yesno scrolling by William Wilgus |
02:17:44 | tm512 | I'm leaning more towards the Fuze+ after waffling about on it. still worried about that report of the screen flickering while booted into rockbox, but I guess if I run into that and it actually bothers me, maybe I can try to help fix it :p |
02:18:06 | aaabbb | tm512: is that a common report or a single one? |
02:18:20 | tm512 | I guess the Fuze+, a nice budget set of IEMs, and a microSD card to load up with my library will end up being my xmas gift to myself this year |
02:18:25 | tm512 | or that's how I'll justify it anyway |
02:18:38 | tm512 | aaabbb: one report on the forum, at least that I can find |
02:18:43 | aaabbb | does it have better battery life? |
02:18:49 | aaabbb | or a better dac or something? |
02:19:51 | tm512 | I dunno how it compares with the other Sansa devices in the sound quality department. it seems like the Fuze+ can get a pretty ridiculous runtime as long as it's set to power off the touch controls while locked |
02:20:00 | tm512 | a report on the wiki of >40hr runtime |
02:20:14 | aaabbb | >40hr playing music? |
02:21:06 | tm512 | evidently. says ~43.5hr playing back ~90kbit MP3 |
02:21:25 | aaabbb | well 90kbit mp3 is pretty crappy |
02:22:50 | tm512 | also says the test was done without earphones, dunno how much of a dip it'd take if they were plugged in |
02:23:10 | tm512 | still pretty respectable battery life I think? compared to the other results on the SansaRuntime page |
02:23:41 | aaabbb | it might be but if something gets 30 hours with 320kbit mp3 and that gets 43 with 90kbit then it's not so impressive |
02:24:53 | tm512 | I'm also expecting the original battery to have degraded a bit. that >40hr result is from 2013, within 3yr of the Fuze+ being released |
02:25:45 | tm512 | I found a listing on ebay that seems to be for new old stock though, so hopefully the battery is still better than a heavily used one |
02:26:09 | tm512 | worst case, I buy a replacement |
02:27:02 | tm512 | seller accepts returns within 30 days too so I could possibly get it swapped for another if they still have stock |
02:27:17 | | Join termac [0] (~termac@user/termac) |
02:27:20 | aaabbb | is it some kind of standard battery form factor? |
02:27:37 | aaabbb | or does it need to be from the manufacturer? |
02:28:57 | tm512 | I dunno if it's some standard form factor, but this seller on amazon sells replacements https://www.amazon.com/NewPower99-SanDisk-Sansa-Fuze-Installation/dp/B008MZM68E |
02:31:46 | aaabbb | if it is a standard form factor, you can buy lfp batteries which don't wear out as fast |
02:38:25 | | Quit termac (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
02:42:58 | | Join CH23_M [0] (~CH23@revspace/participant/ch23) |
03:00 |
03:14:37 | | Join termac [0] (~termac@user/termac) |
03:19:03 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
03:29:26 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: New build round started. Revision 857267e9df, 304 builds, 9 clients. |
03:29:27 | rb-bluebot | x1000: Support GD5F1GQ5xExx NAND chips by Aidan MacDonald |
03:43:26 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: Build round completed after 840 seconds. |
03:43:27 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: Revision 857267e9df result: All green |
04:00 |
04:23:39 | | Join advcomp2019_ [0] (~advcomp20@user/advcomp2019) |
04:27:27 | | Quit advcomp2019 (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
04:30:05 | | Quit termac (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
04:31:42 | | Join termac [0] (~termac@user/termac) |
05:00 |
05:19:06 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
05:35:13 | | Quit termac (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
06:00 |
06:19:09 | | Join enyc [0] (~enyc@user/enyc) |
06:21:56 | * | enyc recalls RockBox-doom and all that heh |
06:47:35 | buZz | isnt that still in rockbox? |
06:48:08 | buZz | i guess that that 'gay-ipod' still hasnt gotten a rockbox port, right? :D |
06:48:45 | buZz | the 'tangara' |
06:49:42 | buZz | seems they removed all evidence it was ever called 'gay-ipod' , lol |
07:00 |
07:19:07 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
08:00 |
08:23:36 | _bilgus | tm512, the fuze plus was my truck mp3 player for years the battery life was never great but pretty sure it was a refurb or factory second or something |
08:24:14 | _bilgus | but it was a very good sounding player and the cpu + ram make it snappy |
08:26:03 | _bilgus | touchscreen was always a pain but twaeking the sensitivity and a few other settings (touch target size IIRC) made it usable |
08:26:34 | _bilgus | I did note having a ground loop make the touch real wonky |
08:28:14 | _bilgus | had this nice little box with an isolation transformer and a 12v to usb adapter that wired to the truck to use car mode and it served me well |
08:29:43 | _bilgus | buZz, the internets r 4EvA |
08:30:10 | _bilgus | sounds happy garish colors? |
09:00 |
09:13:45 | | Join WilliamC [0] (~WilliamC@174-106-182-176.res.spectrum.com) |
09:14:31 | | Quit WilliamC2 (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
09:19:09 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
10:00 |
10:51:41 | speachy | my main beef with the fuze+ (well, other than the wonky touch stuff) was a lack of a true line out. made a noticable/audible difference. |
11:00 |
11:19:13 | *** | No seen item changed, no save performed. |
11:56:47 | | Join othello7 [0] (~Thunderbi@pool-100-36-166-8.washdc.fios.verizon.net) |
12:00 |
12:04:28 | enyc | ²/join #3electronics |
12:04:31 | enyc | hrrm, oops |
12:20:46 | | Quit jacobk (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
13:00 |
13:01:35 | | Join davisr [0] (~davisr@fsf/emeritus/davisr) |
13:11:17 | | Join lebellium [0] (~lebellium@2a01cb040610e000966d497ab8f1a749.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
13:19:14 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
13:53:45 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: New build round started. Revision 8347203dc6, 304 builds, 10 clients. |
13:53:45 | rb-bluebot | [BugFix] scroll_stop_viewport_rect off by 1 by William Wilgus |
14:00 |
14:03:40 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: Build round completed after 598 seconds. |
14:03:42 | rb-bluebot | Build Server message: Revision 8347203dc6 result: All green |
14:07:41 | _bilgus | that was fassst |
14:09:12 | speachy | only one file changed, so ccache did its thing. :) |
14:21:05 | _bilgus | have a new bug i think I just found |
14:21:24 | _bilgus | clear_viewport and clear_display appear to call each other |
14:23:20 | _bilgus | https://github.com/Rockbox/rockbox/blob/master/firmware/drivers/lcd-bitmap-common.c#L228, https://github.com/Rockbox/rockbox/blob/master/firmware/drivers/lcd-color-common.c#L101 |
14:24:56 | _bilgus | hmm maybe that is by design? but I can't see how it would work |
14:25:59 | speachy | the vp pointer for each might not be the same |
14:28:51 | speachy | default vp might not be the "root" vp. but if it is, it's ... gonna be infinite. |
14:29:07 | _bilgus | but its set in clear_display as such lcd_current_viewport = &default_vp; but its not in a death loop so clearly I'm missing something |
14:29:34 | speachy | default_vp might not be the "root" vp. |
14:30:19 | speachy | root meaning points at the raw framebuffer. |
14:30:21 | | Quit sch (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
14:33:13 | _bilgus | yeah I thought about that but I think the only thing saving it is that the default vp has the buffer set to NULL |
14:33:29 | _bilgus | this code path is never run |
14:34:32 | _bilgus | I bet if I set that default to the actual frame buffer it will explode and there is no other case where it works as intended |
14:35:41 | _bilgus | and I bet at the time I wrote the frame buffer rewrite it was already disable in such a manner as the design carried through in the rewrite |
14:35:56 | _bilgus | but i'll have to look back |
14:36:49 | _bilgus | a latent bug I guess |
14:40:53 | _bilgus | no still appears to run fine maybe it really is different in that particular case |
15:00 |
15:19:15 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
15:22:31 | | Quit braewoods__ (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
15:22:38 | | Join braewoods_ [0] (~braewoods@user/braewoods) |
15:36:06 | Trzyzet | @termac the noise problem happens because most mobile players has real S/N ratio between 80-85dB. When you are using a monitors with such sensitivity like Shures or other IEMs there will be noise. I'm afraid there is nothing which can be fixed, you can always use more power hungry headphones but it's going around that problem, not actually solving it |
15:37:34 | Trzyzet | Also the noise is usually recognisable only with total silence, not during playing the music so I would and I am just living with it |
15:58:02 | _bilgus | someone had similar issues and for a particular album they made silence tracks to play and made it a single song |
15:58:50 | _bilgus | but I seem to recall someone making a patch that fed an intermediate track between songs |
16:00 |
16:00:03 | _bilgus | a small commercial sounds like the start of those prison sansas |
16:15:02 | | Join jacobk [0] (~quassel@utdpat241106.utdallas.edu) |
17:00 |
17:19:19 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
17:22:01 | | Quit jacobk (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
17:34:05 | | Quit aaabbb (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
17:34:13 | | Join aaabbb [0] (sitku@bitcoinshell.mooo.com) |
17:44:31 | | Join jacobk [0] (~quassel@129.110.242.224) |
18:00 |
18:01:40 | | Quit lebellium (Quit: Leaving) |
18:05:30 | | Join Moriar [0] (~moriar@107-200-193-159.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net) |
18:58:31 | | Join massiveH [0] (~massiveH@2600:4040:a982:c800:9117:ed9f:267:4a62) |
19:00 |
19:19:23 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
21:00 |
21:19:24 | *** | No seen item changed, no save performed. |
21:40:26 | | Quit othello7 (Quit: othello7) |
21:40:46 | | Join othello7 [0] (~Thunderbi@pool-100-36-166-8.washdc.fios.verizon.net) |
21:41:53 | | Quit davisr (Remote host closed the connection) |
22:00 |
22:14:00 | tm512 | _bilgus: yeah touch controls aren't something I'm thrilled about dealing with on the Fuze+. I dunno if it's bad enough to justify going for an e200 or original Fuze |
22:15:24 | tm512 | occasionally I'd output to pretty decent headphones (like maybe even my HD600 if the Fuze+ has the oomph to drive them), so if it has decent sound quality that might be worth dealing with the touch nonsense |
22:34:53 | | Quit JanC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
22:41:05 | tm512 | would be kinda surprised if the HD600 couldn't be driven to a listenable volume, like they've done fine with my phone and my PC's onboard audio back when I was using plain ALSA and switching everything over to my amp was a hassle |
22:42:30 | tm512 | well, switching software over to my DAC, that is. I guess I probably could've taken line out from my onboard audio and put it through my amp |
22:47:50 | | Join JanC [0] (~janc@user/janc) |
22:51:11 | _bilgus | for the price difference it probably is |
22:51:44 | _bilgus | the fuzev2 is nice kit but the battery is a much easier replacement |
22:52:11 | _bilgus | the headphone connector is annoyingly plsced imo but it is pretty well mounted |
22:52:38 | _bilgus | fuzev2 has a metal case IIRC but both have plastic screens |
22:53:03 | _bilgus | sorry battery in fuze+ is easier to replace |
22:54:30 | _bilgus | the xduoo would be up you alley too |
22:55:01 | _bilgus | x3 has a line out assuming you can find them |
22:56:41 | tm512 | it'd be like $12 more to get that new old stock Fuze+ compared to the used e200R I was looking at. I see an e250R for $24, though it seems like it has "REFURB" stamped onto the metal backing |
22:56:54 | tm512 | well, "RE URB" with some of the letters rotated |
22:56:58 | tm512 | it looks ugly |
22:57:12 | tm512 | this one: https://www.ebay.com/itm/305278577877 |
22:58:09 | tm512 | xDuoo sounds like it's more of a hifi player, though I guess I'd have to check pricing |
22:59:23 | tm512 | I do not need 24bit @ 192KHz, so I don't want to pay for that. as far as I can tell it's just snake oil unless you're producing music (then high sample rates help prevent aliasing effects, etc) |
23:00 |
23:01:36 | | Quit jacobk (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
23:01:49 | tm512 | not seeing the X3 on ebay unfortunately. X2S is $60 but not seeing that as supported by rockbox even looking at the unstable ports |
23:02:00 | aaabbb | a portable player is not going to be able to achieve true 24 bits anyway. the majority of the lower bits will be noise |
23:02:35 | aaabbb | 192khz is useful only for mastering since you can do things like stretch without interpolation. the most our ears need is 48khz |
23:03:36 | tm512 | I can only hear up to around 15KHz nowadays so 32KHz would probably be enough for me :P |
23:10:05 | WilliamC | I think most audiophiles are full of it. |
23:15:49 | tm512 | at least high sample rate stuff is fairly harmless snake oil. I feel bad for the people who fall for those scams regarding stuff like obscenely expensive cabling |
23:15:53 | | Join jacobk [0] (~quassel@utdpat242026.utdallas.edu) |
23:16:15 | tm512 | I just monoprice cabling for my >$400 headphone setup, heh |
23:16:22 | tm512 | no complaints |
23:17:27 | tm512 | s/just/just use/ |
23:19:10 | tm512 | I remember a while back coming across someone who refused to use FLAC because he swore he could hear a difference between it and uncompressed audio |
23:19:28 | *** | Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" |
23:20:27 | aaabbb | lmao |
23:28:19 | tm512 | he was not fazed by being shown that a WAV transcoded to FLAC and back resulted in a file with the exact same SHA-256 checksum. I think he was trying to make up some excuse about the act of the CPU decoding FLAC "coloring" the sound somehow, did not manage to explain how that would happen with the exact same bitstream being sent to his PC's DAC |
23:29:01 | aaabbb | even a lossy encoding can't be distinguished from flac/wav at a high enough bitrate |
23:29:08 | | Quit othello7 (Remote host closed the connection) |
23:29:51 | WilliamC | aaabbb, that's why I use high end vorbis files, unfortunately that limits my selection of players |
23:30:19 | aaabbb | i use opus 96kbps, transparent for most music |
23:30:38 | WilliamC | I thought Opus was meant for voice |
23:30:39 | aaabbb | if i cared about always being transparent even with classical music i'd go 128 or 160 or something |
23:30:50 | tm512 | I still do some listening from lossless files, but most of my listening nowadays has been through youtube, which I think uses ~128kbit opus? |
23:30:54 | | Quit hactar|ant (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
23:30:56 | tm512 | that's what I remember reading anyway |
23:31:03 | aaabbb | no it's meant for both voice and music. it's a hybrid codec and goes into silk mode at low bitrate which is otpimized for speach, and celt mode at high bitrate which is optimized for music |
23:31:32 | aaabbb | so it can be thought of as a hybrid between speex and an improved version of vorbis |
23:32:20 | WilliamC | I don't feel like having to convert my stuff to another format to be honest |
23:33:50 | Galois | you don't really have to convert, you can just start using opus for new files. Most things that play vorbis play opus. |
23:34:45 | aaabbb | yeah don't convert vorbis to opus, that would cause quality loss |
23:34:53 | WilliamC | It always does |
23:35:13 | aaabbb | if you have the original flac, you can transcode it to opus and then replace the vorbis |
23:35:21 | Galois | opus has our good friend fraunhofer the patent troll running scared. They're claiming that they have patents on opus. Which is complete BS, but the way that the patent game works, even the accusation is enough for them to use to extort money. |
23:35:22 | aaabbb | ou could cut the file size down significantly while retaining equivalent quality |
23:35:36 | WilliamC | Is the quality enough that I would rip all of CD again? |
23:35:47 | aaabbb | nah |
23:36:10 | WilliamC | Good, my house is currently inaccesible due to renovations anyway |
23:36:13 | aaabbb | but when you rip another cd, rip it to opus. when i rip cds, i encode as flac, then save that and put whatever lossy i want on my media player |
23:36:19 | Galois | I mean for example a bunch of the patents are from 2018 and opus was invented in 2012, patents don't work like that, but the lawyers don't care about patently false BS |
23:36:30 | aaabbb | Galois: are they the ones who created that patent pool that threatens anyone making hardware implementations? |
23:36:46 | aaabbb | opus-pool.com or whatever it is |
23:36:55 | Galois | yeah, they lost their mp3 grift because the mp3 patents all expired, and opus is better than their preferred AAC which they can make money from |
23:37:00 | WilliamC | It's a shame that MP3 is the universal standard all because it was first |
23:37:08 | aaabbb | well, xHE-AAC is better than opus at very low bitrates |
23:37:17 | | Quit m01 (Quit: Konversation terminated.) |
23:37:17 | aaabbb | but 64kbps+ they are pretty equal |
23:37:34 | WilliamC | I thought AAC was liked because it allowed copy protection |
23:38:22 | aaabbb | it was liked because of itunes |
23:38:40 | WilliamC | I never used that |
23:39:00 | WilliamC | I have never owned an Apple product |
23:39:47 | WilliamC | Stuff costs too much |
23:39:53 | tm512 | when I was a teenager I really liked Mac stuff but I guess most of us are cringe when we're teens |
23:39:53 | aaabbb | it's also standard with mpeg |
23:40:04 | | Join m01 [0] (~quassel@vps-b172b88b.vps.ovh.net) |
23:40:34 | | Join hactar|ant [0] (~zem@97-115-73-158.ptld.qwest.net) |
23:40:36 | WilliamC | tm512, I think I'm older than you. |
23:41:34 | WilliamC | My school had Apple IIe computers in ever classroom. We had Macs in the computer lab though. |
23:42:22 | tm512 | yeah, you're probably older than me. I was in high school in the late 00s |
23:42:46 | WilliamC | Late 90s for me. |
23:43:00 | WilliamC | I graduated in 01. |
23:43:07 | Galois | <−− early 90s?! |
23:43:15 | massiveH | "have you hugged your computer today?" |
23:44:30 | WilliamC | Feel like music players have been replaced with cellphones. Used to be a lot more options. Even Apple quit it. |
23:45:10 | tm512 | right before I entered high school one of my friends clued me in to the fact that the local college where his mom worked had a hallway full of their decommissioned computers, so my main computers for a good chunk of those years were hand-me-down Macs |
23:46:02 | WilliamC | I was never that lucky. |
23:46:36 | tm512 | really liked OS X for a few years before I hit the point of no return with Linux |
23:48:03 | WilliamC | I work for the DoD, you'd have a heart attack about that stuff we destroy |
23:49:06 | tm512 | probably. my inclination towards saving e-waste has not gone away |
23:49:37 | tm512 | my primary laptop is a e-waste rescue, a Dell Latitude with a first-gen i5 |
23:51:03 | WilliamC | My phone runs on a contracting laptop my company didn't ask for back |