--- Log for 26.11.104 Server: niven.freenode.net Channel: #rockbox --- Nick: logbot Version: Dancer V4.16 Started: 16 days and 2 hours ago 00.07.20 Join _aLEX [0] (Alexandre@mutualite-3-82-67-66-128.fbx.proxad.net) 00.08.24 Quit _aLF (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 00.09.59 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 00.38.20 Join CrunchyBear [0] (~3eff200b@labb.contactor.se) 00.44.32 Join webguest70 [0] (~accaa17b@labb.contactor.se) 00.44.32 Quit webguest70 (Client Quit) 00.44.39 Join webguest08 [0] (~accaa17b@labb.contactor.se) 00.44.39 Quit webguest08 (Client Quit) 00.44.51 Join Digital007 [0] (~accaa17b@labb.contactor.se) 00.45.10 # hi 00.45.43 # does apple sell the white earphones seperately? 00.47.21 Quit CrunchyBear ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 00.58.55 Quit AciD (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 00.59.38 Join gromit [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 00.59.46 Nick gromit is now known as gromit`` (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 01.00.12 Join CrunchyBear [0] (~Crunchy@cpc3-cove3-6-0-cust184.brhm.cable.ntl.com) 01.00.46 Quit chendo (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) 01.01.33 # Hey everyone, was hoping someone can help. After a complete format on a 6000 player, rockbox or even the newest archos firmware won't recognise, and it just boots from the initial one ... bit confused. 01.10.04 # crunchybear try reformmatting with FAT32 01.11.15 # archos wont recognise NTFS 01.11.34 # It was just reformatted with FAT32, everything seems to run fine, except picking up the archos.mod 01.13.04 # oh 01.13.19 # yeah, heh 01.13.57 # is it flashed 01.13.58 # ? 01.14.45 # no, I don't think so ... ? 01.15.06 # dunno 01.15.20 # had a archos recoder once 01.16.38 # wasnt bad at all 01.16.52 # on my 4th mp3 player now 01.17.08 # my players been fine for years and years now, never seems to fail me, jolly good players 01.17.28 # yea 01.17.36 # i have an iriver now 01.18.00 # ah cool cool 01.18.40 # H120 01.19.16 # they used to be called ihp-120s before HP made them change the name 01.20.16 # lol 01.21.23 # heh 01.22.25 # they said the initials HP was their trademark 01.58.33 Quit Digital007 ("CGI:IRC (Ping timeout)") 02.00.18 Quit CrunchyBear ("Please feed the cat") 02.10.01 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 02.24.17 Join gromit [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 02.32.31 Join Stryke` [0] (~Chairman8@24-168-110-99.si.rr.com) 02.43.01 Quit gromit`` (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 02.52.17 Join amiconn_ [0] (~jens@pD95D12F1.dip.t-dialin.net) 03.00.50 Quit amiconn (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 03.00.50 Nick amiconn_ is now known as amiconn (~jens@pD95D12F1.dip.t-dialin.net) 03.07.41 Quit Stryke` ("Friends don't let friends listen to Anti-Flag") 03.11.43 Nick Ka_ is now known as KAs (~tkirk@pcp0010732484pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 03.11.56 Nick KAs is now known as KAs_wife (~tkirk@pcp0010732484pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 03.12.26 Nick KAs_wife is now known as nika (~tkirk@pcp0010732484pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 03.14.37 Join gromit`` [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 03.14.58 Quit gromit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 03.26.34 Nick nika is now known as Ka (~tkirk@pcp0010732484pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 03.26.47 Nick Ka is now known as Ka_ (~tkirk@pcp0010732484pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 03.40.42 Join gromit [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 03.40.43 Quit gromit`` (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 04.10.05 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 05.14.38 Quit Seed (Nick collision from services.) 05.14.50 Join Seed [0] (ben@192.114.41.140) 05.59.18 Join scott666_ [0] (~scott666@c-24-245-58-48.mn.client2.attbi.com) 06.10.07 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 06.40.43 Part amiconn 07.12.42 Join edx [0] (edx@pD9EAB821.dip.t-dialin.net) 07.37.06 Quit Seed (Nick collision from services.) 07.37.18 Join Seed [0] (ben@192.114.41.140) 07.41.36 Join gromit`` [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 07.41.36 Quit gromit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 07.51.24 Join amiconn [0] (~jens@pD95D12F1.dip.t-dialin.net) 07.57.17 # Good morning 08.10.09 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 08.13.11 Join oxygen77 [0] (~Chris@pauguste-7-82-66-87-78.fbx.proxad.net) 08.14.23 Join LinusN [0] (~linus@labb.contactor.se) 08.26.39 Quit einhirn (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 08.43.39 Join AciD [0] (~gni@acid.user) 08.53.12 Join einhirn [0] (Miranda@bsod.rz.tu-clausthal.de) 09.09.28 Quit AciD (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 09.26.17 Join AciD [0] (~gni@acid.user) 09.27.14 Quit scott666_ (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 09.30.46 Join scott666_ [0] (~scott666@c-24-245-58-48.mn.client2.attbi.com) 09.46.46 Join [IDC]Dragon [0] (~d90a3255@labb.contactor.se) 09.58.36 Quit oxygen77 ("Cho") 10.10.13 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 10.27.18 Join floof [0] (~floof@l02m-15-75.d2.club-internet.fr) 10.27.23 # hi all 10.27.28 # hi 10.28.04 # I'm trying to know if the rockbox project is likely to run on a Gmini 220 10.28.10 # it isn't 10.28.18 # will it ? 10.28.27 # I doubt that 10.28.31 # why ? 10.28.47 # feel free to make it 10.29.14 # i would if i could, but my programming skills are below zero ... 10.29.40 # so, the reason is that no owner of a gmini is skilled or determined enough 10.29.58 # or gets enough assistance 10.30.22 # many of us thinks Archos doesn't deserve rockbox 10.30.34 # so we won't go for another archos player 10.30.39 # why ? archos is kick ass !!! 10.30.53 # well, my gmini at least 10.30.53 # if it kicks ass, why do you want Rockbox for it? 10.31.35 # because it could bring interressant features ... like battery saving etc ... gapless playback ... 10.31.50 # so, then it doesn't kick ass since it lacks basic features 10.32.16 # that's how I see it at least 10.36.46 # http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/NonArchos#Gmini 10.38.28 # ok, I'll stick with my old archos firmware ... bye 10.39.07 # Bagder: Who do you think "deserves" rockbox? 10.40.09 # we! 10.43.19 # Talk for yourself ;) 10.43.27 # I was thinking about hardware manufacturers. 10.43.34 # Anyone been interested in using the rockbox project? 10.43.35 # hey, I talk to myself all the time! ;-) 10.44.13 # no 10.44.22 # but I think Archos has been VERY ignorant 10.44.26 Join Lynx_ [0] (HydraIRC@134.95.189.59) 10.48.11 # Bagder: The fact that archos doesn't kick ass because it lacks basic features is imho the very reason why it *needs* rockbox. 10.48.22 # I agree 10.48.51 # If archos would have been good enough from the start it might have *deserved* rockbox but wouldn't need it 10.49.24 # by deserving, I mean that the company could've acted differently 10.49.31 # I think there is no current player hw manufacturer that deserved rockbox. 10.49.40 # *deserves 10.50.25 # do you need customers like me to ask them for it ... and maube to pressure them ? 10.50.37 # *maybe 10.50.53 # I could imagine a company deciding to produce a player that is running rockbox right from the start, and supporting the developers accordingly. 10.51.08 # That company would probably deserve rockbox 10.52.12 # Neuros 10.52.17 # is there only iriver that deserves RB ? 10.52.50 # we don't know if they deserve it or not, we haven't been in touch with them 10.53.45 # LinusN: What about Neuros? 10.54.31 # they want to build a player for rockbox 10.54.47 Quit floof (Remote closed the connection) 10.54.55 Quit scott666_ ("i'll be back...eventually...") 10.58.02 # <[IDC]Dragon> OT: my 1 GB MMC arrived 10.58.26 # <[IDC]Dragon> and I left the Ondio at home 10.58.39 # LinusN: Is that a new device, or the same thing they recently released the sources for? The latter imho doesn't qualify as a device that truly deserves rockbox. 10.58.42 # [IDC]Dragon: no EL modules? 10.58.43 # [IDC]Dragon: :( 10.58.58 # amiconn: read again: "want to" 10.59.03 # <[IDC]Dragon> LinusN: EL is coming? :-) 10.59.43 # LinusN: Did they contact you or what? 10.59.54 # There's nothing in the wiki yet 11.00.30 # amiconn: we're not talking loudly about it, because it is so far only a thought in Joe Born's head 11.00.37 # http://www.rockbox.org/irc/rockbox-20040916.txt 11.00.51 # LinusN: they want to build the player around the software? :O 11.01.19 # [IDC]Dragon: i have ordered the modules to your address 11.01.36 # <[IDC]Dragon> thank you so much 11.02.32 # you're welcome 11.36.40 Join ashridah [0] (ashridah@220.253.120.99) 11.42.03 # LinusN: Very interesting chat with JoeBorn indeed. I missed that somehow... 11.42.04 Quit gromit`` (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 11.42.22 Join gromit`` [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 11.45.44 Part ashridah 12.10.16 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 13.14.05 Join amiconn_ [0] (~jens@pD9E7ECC1.dip.t-dialin.net) 13.21.31 Quit amiconn (Nick collision from services.) 13.21.31 Nick amiconn_ is now known as amiconn (~jens@pD9E7ECC1.dip.t-dialin.net) 13.29.53 Join ashridah [0] (ashridah@220.253.120.99) 13.56.02 Join lImbus [0] (~manuel@kernel.cycos.net) 14.10.18 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 14.13.00 Join till_varoquaux [0] (~till@pc18.ie2.u-psud.fr) 14.13.31 # Hello 14.13.38 # hi 14.13.42 # I have a very dumb question 14.14.00 # shoot 14.14.24 # has any of the devs try to contact archos to see if you could make a device hand in hand with them 14.14.26 # ? 14.14.36 # nope 14.14.49 # That could turn out interesting 14.15.02 # i very much doubt it 14.15.13 # LinusN: tell me more about neuros... are they considering manufacturing a new unit and using rockbox as os? 14.15.29 # they have discussed it with us 14.15.42 # I mean actually trying to pick out hardware that would be easier/more flexible to programm 14.16.05 # till_varoquaux: it's not in their interest 14.16.13 # till_varoquaux, that would increase the cost 14.16.20 # They could really benefit from your work however 14.16.25 # LinusN: nothing more happenend? :( 14.16.39 # Oh I see... 14.16.45 # and why that? 14.16.50 # they are into video devices nowadays, and there's not much in rockbox they have use for 14.17.24 # Yeah but they could try to getan open source firmware for this 14.17.56 # And I'm pretty shure the community as tons of ideas for design improvements 14.18.04 # here's my view of it: 14.18.13 # they want to sell hardware 14.18.35 # if they release the firmware, they prolong the lifespan of their products 14.18.46 # and they sell less devices 14.19.00 # Yeah bu they could have a better market share 14.19.24 # I mean with Ipods swarming the whole business 14.19.56 # sure, but i doubt that their management gets it 14.19.57 # LinusN: personally I doubt they have analyzed it that much. i rather think they simply don't understand what we do. 14.19.58 # till_varoquaux: market share isn't a major driving force. increasing profits are, which you only get by developing a 'new' product every XXX units of time and selling them again to early adopters 14.20.23 # My point of view (I might be very wrong): 14.20.41 # releasing a kickass product, and then not being able to sell new ones because the public gets what they want won't get them as far 14.20.53 # Developpement of units could be cheaper for them 14.21.08 # There is always room for hardware improvements 14.21.21 # (this is already what they do) 14.22.07 # and people would be a lot more enclined to use the units if it had something friendlier than musicmatch budled with it 14.22.44 # I thight integration with amarok for instance (or winamp) could be a reall plus 14.23.03 # And they would benefit from a savier design 14.23.55 # (I think there units while being technologically great don't have teh good looks of an IPOD) 14.24.53 Quit ashridah ("sleep") 14.25.54 # anyone here? 14.25.58 # yes 14.26.05 # amarok? 14.26.14 # it's for linux 14.26.22 # looks a lot like itunes 14.26.34 # i too think that an open source firmware might be good for archos 14.26.43 # what's to integrate? it's a collection of files. 14.26.43 # but i don't care 14.26.57 # one could port it easilly t windows and mac 14.27.20 # half the point of the archos is that you don't have to use silly programs, just copy the files and play them 14.27.31 # I know 14.27.33 # exactly 14.27.38 # i would never buy a player that required pc software 14.27.47 # that's why I liked my jukebox 14.28.21 # however this doesn't prevent to integrate synchrisation... to players 14.28.32 # keeping the best of both world 14.29.09 # And the multimedia requires you to recompress most of your movies 14.29.10 # i don't understand what that means. the player plays mp3 files. what is there to "integrate"? 14.29.40 # just a very simple mirror utility would to the trick 14.30.32 # that's a software issue, nothing with the player. hence no integration. 14.30.55 # Yes this is partially true: 14.31.18 # If you get pluggable DRM modules you could have full integration 14.31.30 # from the store to the player 14.31.41 # and thats firmware issues 14.31.46 # sure, if you want to be sued by apple 14.32.25 # Some other companies might be interested in building there own DRM nodules 14.32.37 # not necessarilly Fair Use 14.32.39 # i don't think itunes is a concept to copy. it's way too locked in and annoys customers 14.32.58 # I don't like it either but it works 14.33.06 # [IDC]Dragon: i just committed the metronome tap patch, could you try it on the ondio? 14.33.24 # <[IDC]Dragon> not now, but later, yes 14.33.39 # And given the fact that most (if not all) online music stores have there own DRM 14.34.03 # not so, only american stores 14.34.05 # [IDC]Dragon: thanks 14.34.13 # you will want one day to be able to get a player able to play DRM'd file 14.34.21 # I don't 14.34.28 # Wasn't aware of this 14.35.09 # most customers like to have a package that works out of the box (store player...) 14.35.34 # this could be done with the involvement of the open source community 14.35.55 # open source and drm are pretty incompatible 14.36.02 # And I would favour store that don't sell DRM'd files 14.36.36 # I mean open source firmware but closed source DRM pluggins for playback 14.36.54 # then it is not open source 14.37.04 # not the plug-in 14.37.32 # for instance currently I'm using eclipse(ide for java) 14.37.38 # it's gpl'd 14.37.57 # so basically you're asking why archos doesn't setup a music store and try to compete with apple on their turf? 14.37.58 # but there are commercial plug-ins for i 14.38.04 # nope 14.38.28 # yeah but how much do you think we want to work for free just so others can profit from our work, and not even share their code? 14.38.52 # I get your point 14.39.07 # it's very difficult do mix open and closed source. many have tried, few have succeeded. 14.39.32 # As you have pointed out some stores don't use DRM 14.39.55 # these are just examples of what could be done 14.40.32 # my point is Archos definitly has the edge when it comes to hardware 14.40.35 # [IDC]Dragon: aaah, the ondio metronome keys are still not correct 14.41.10 # however their CHI is not as User-Friendly (arguably) as others 14.41.30 # And there design could also benefit for some improvements 14.41.38 # yes, the iPod is not successful because it has better software. it is successful because they have spent many many millions on marketing. 14.41.53 # well yes and no 14.42.01 # It looksmuch better 14.42.05 # (and to a certain degree because apple has very loyal followers) 14.43.08 # but an archos player could have all (and much more) of the qualities of the Ipod 14.43.25 # so could most mp3 players 14.43.39 # *could* being the word 14.43.40 # which qualities are that, exactly? two-second gap between songs? seven-click volume adjustment? 14.44.02 # Much better design 14.44.04 # good-looking 14.44.17 # apparently people think so 14.45.06 # And indexed file searching (this is arguable because it currently requires a special upload mechanisme) 14.45.24 # several players have that 14.45.34 # easy as pie to get working with a music player/music store 14.46.14 # and trendy because of addvertisement 14.46.41 # those are not properties, they are just marketing impressions 14.47.01 # * Bagder is trying to figure out what the point in this discussion is 14.47.02 # i've never heard anyone have problems copying their music to an archos 14.47.08 # Bagder: so do i :) 14.51.36 # i think perhaps my point is that trying to copy the ipod is not going to make anyone happy. those who like the ipod should buy it. 14.51.54 # also, irrational brand loyalty is not good for you :) 15.16.09 # Yeah I guess you are somehow right 15.16.59 # I just don't like the looks of archos units (I think most of them are plain ugly) 15.17.34 # and I was wondering why they weren't trying to get more feedback from there users 15.18.17 # i agree with you about the looks, even though it seems they are starting to learn that now. the gmini 400 isn't bad imho. 15.18.33 # I also think (and I guess we'll all agree on that) that *their* firmware is not as good as it could be 15.19.01 # well no mp3 player comes with good firmware, that's not an archos thing 15.19.35 # Since they have terrific hardware I thought they could really do a killer unit if they worked hand in hand with the users willing to get involbed 15.19.58 # but I guess the Ipod was a very bad exemple 15.20.11 # yes, but that is very unnatural for any company to do. I wouldn't expect it to happen anywhere for several more years. 15.20.25 # sigh 15.20.43 # companies are not used to customers knowing more than their engineers.... ;) 15.20.48 # I just think you guys could offer to give a hand 15.21.01 # hahaha 15.21.05 # you are naive 15.21.13 # I mean they *are* shipping Rockbox with th jukebox now 15.21.27 # Badger: I might be 15.21.44 # they know where we are 15.21.47 # they know what we do 15.21.50 # they know what we can 15.21.57 # do they? i spoke to their marketing guy about that a long time ago, but they demanded we call rockbox a "cooperation project" 15.22.13 # (do they ship?) 15.22.30 # I read a news saying they did 15.22.40 # got a link? 15.22.57 # I bought my jukebox very long ago and I sure didn't have it 15.23.04 # I'll search for one 15.24.05 # http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-archive-2002-12/0302.shtml 15.24.09 # there you go 15.24.22 Join lImbus_ [0] (~manuel@kernel.cycos.net) 15.24.29 Quit lImbus_ (Remote closed the connection) 15.24.33 # till_varoquaux: Zagor is Björn 15.24.38 # who wrote that mail 15.24.42 Join lImbus_ [0] (~manuel@kernel.cycos.net) 15.24.50 # Hmmm 15.25.00 # "plans" being the word to focus on 15.25.06 Quit lImbus_ (Remote closed the connection) 15.25.16 # we spoke on the phone a few times, but it never happened as far as I know. 15.25.17 Join lImbus_ [0] (~manuel@kernel.cycos.net) 15.25.28 # so Rockbox never got shipped with the jukebox 15.25.37 # as far as I know, no 15.25.41 # that's sad..... 15.25.50 # I thought it had 15.26.31 # so my utopia of archos walking hand in hand with the community is fading away 15.26.35 # ;-( 15.28.41 # I guess it would take a lot of work to get archos to understand it is good for *them* to open up a little there business model 15.28.57 # I mean they are selling hardware not software 15.33.54 # exactly 15.34.34 # dang I gotta go in a couple of minuts 15.35.28 # well if you think a gesture towards archos to work with this community could have any positive impact I'm willing to try to get it working 15.36.42 # thanks, but we're not terribly interested. we have no plans to support their newer players, so there is not much they could offer us. a "thank you" would be nice, of course but I have a very hard time seeing that happen :) 15.37.45 # so if I get it right 15.38.26 # If they opened the specs for one of there futur products (or even better asked you your advice) 15.38.54 # you would decline (because you don't have time and/or interest) 15.39.03 # ? 15.39.31 # I bet a bunch of people would be happy to develop for it 15.39.40 # rockbox is open source 15.39.54 # anyone can make it run on a new platform, given some time and sweat 15.40.13 # and lots of skill of course 15.40.14 # if they wanted honest cooperation we'd probably be interested, but of course we can't make any promises 15.40.32 # I just need to know if there would be support from the community if they offered to open up 15.41.17 Quit lImbus_ (Remote closed the connection) 15.41.17 Quit gromit`` (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 15.41.25 # I mean I can't justb go up to them and ask to have a more open devellopement model if I don't have back-up 15.41.34 Join gromit`` [0] (~gromit@m117.net81-65-8.noos.fr) 15.41.34 # I meant offer 15.41.54 # we can never guarantee anything 15.41.56 # well, you can't *know*. you can have strong indications, but the whole point of open source is that everyone does what he wants to. 15.42.08 # unless they pay 15.42.08 # Yes I get it 15.42.58 # if they were seriously interested in approaching the community, I'm sure we could agree on good ways of cooperation though. 15.43.15 # I'm sure we would 15.43.34 # ...just that it won't happen 15.43.49 # Well I guess I might still give it a shot 15.44.19 # I need to get a serious offer together first 15.44.29 # foster a community maybe 15.44.38 # but who knows? 15.44.54 # what would such an offer contain? 15.45.22 # Well not really an offer 15.45.39 # I meant showing there is potential 15.46.02 # and peoples willing to cooperate 15.46.17 # not come just as a lunatic 15.46.33 # well they know about us very well, so that's not a problem 15.46.46 # thx gotta go 15.47.21 # but I'll try to thing about a good to get things started when I'll have spare time 15.47.54 # There is still a lot to discuss about 15.48.13 # and I guess that I'm going nowhere fast 15.48.28 # i'm available for discussion 15.48.34 # but hey... as said before who knows? 15.48.39 # thanks 15.48.47 # see you around 15.49.04 # yup 15.49.21 Part LinusN 15.49.43 Quit till_varoquaux ("Client Exiting") 16.10.21 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 16.24.52 Part Zagor 16.30.24 Quit [IDC]Dragon ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 17.25.49 Quit silencer_ ("leaving") 17.25.59 Join silencer [0] (~silencer@zen.via.ecp.fr) 17.26.29 Join MooMaunder [0] (~me@194.152.87.150) 17.41.29 Quit edx (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 17.46.43 Quit gromit`` () 17.56.06 Quit lImbus (Ping timeout: 14400 seconds) 18.06.17 Join gromit` [0] (gromit@82.234.244.69) 18.10.24 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 18.14.13 Quit Lynx_ (" HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- *I* use it, so it must be good!") 18.17.19 Join webguest16 [0] (~d9e8ff9a@labb.contactor.se) 18.27.23 Join scott666_ [0] (~scott666@c-24-245-58-48.mn.client2.attbi.com) 18.31.18 Join einhirn_ [0] (Miranda@bsod.rz.tu-clausthal.de) 18.35.15 Join edx [0] (edx@pD9EAB821.dip.t-dialin.net) 18.38.18 Quit edx (Client Quit) 18.49.36 Quit einhirn (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) 18.50.46 Join Tang [0] (~chatzilla@84.98.0.128) 18.57.06 Quit einhirn_ (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) 18.59.47 # hi all folks :) 19.04.02 # I don't know if it's known 19.04.27 # but i have to say that in the past 19.05.03 # some guys tld about a n alt.firmware for iHP called "Ennis project" 19.05.51 # the matter is tyhat nobody know if it was real or just hoax 19.06.15 # anyway theses guys said they stopped their project 19.06.24 # due to iRiver pressures... 19.06.59 # interesting 19.07.13 # So if it's true i don't think there is something to wait from iriver about "helping" 19.07.29 # I also do know for sure 19.07.37 # we never thought they'd help us 19.08.19 # ok i have i 19.08.31 # misunderstood something about the neuros chat maybe 19.08.58 # anyway i hope the compagny won't be aware of your project 19.09.12 # I doubt it matters 19.09.16 # we do nothing illegal 19.09.26 # yes i do know but 19.09.52 # seems they are quite "agressive" with all alt project 19.10.04 # for exemple they were 19.10.14 # I guess we'll see then 19.10.24 # okay 19.10.48 # for exemple iriver didn't aprpeciate that much all the inetrface customizing stuff 19.11.15 # (they removed all thrads about theses tools on their boards and so on 19.11.23 Join einhirn [0] (Miranda@bsod.rz.tu-clausthal.de) 19.12.10 # Anyway pesonnaly i think rockbox iRiverport is the best things that could happen for iRiver 19.12.40 # since their own firmware support is simply awful 19.12.48 # :-) 19.13.02 # I've orded one now 19.13.08 # you too 19.13.14 # gotta go 19.13.17 # * Bagder runs away 19.13.42 # i heard zagior ordered 3 i thought it was for some Rckbx memebers 19.14.05 # i don't realyy understand how the projetc work 19.14.45 # is there a wiki page about the reockbox organisation for exemple 19.15.21 # i'm just curious about how you cn coordinate so much members work 19.24.46 Nick gromit` is now known as gromit`faraway (gromit@82.234.244.69) 19.26.19 # i've to go bye :) 19.26.23 Quit Tang ("Chatzilla 0.9.66 [Mozilla rv:1.7.5/20041108]") 19.49.27 Join Alexandre [0] (Alexandre@mutualite-3-82-67-66-128.fbx.proxad.net) 19.51.50 Quit _aLEX (niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 19.51.50 NSplit niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net 19.51.50 Quit Bagder (niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) 19.53.55 Join Stryke` [0] (~Chairman8@24-168-110-99.si.rr.com) 20.05.29 NHeal niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net 20.05.29 NJoin Bagder [0] (~daniel@1-1-5-26a.hud.sth.bostream.se) 20.10.28 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 20.17.34 Quit webguest16 ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 20.19.22 Quit einhirn ("Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org") 20.19.55 Join pfavr [0] (~Peter_Fav@213.237.46.232.adsl.ron.worldonline.dk) 20.44.20 Join einhirn [0] (~Miranda@carlsberg.heim2.tu-clausthal.de) 20.54.42 Quit Stryke` (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 22.10.30 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 22.15.09 Quit pfavr ("ChatZilla 0.9.61 [Mozilla rv:1.7.3/20041007]") 22.23.41 Quit Hoho (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 22.24.06 Join Stryke` [0] (~Chairman8@24-168-110-99.si.rr.com) 22.44.43 Join billyk [0] (~dlaw234@user-0cev08c.cable.mindspring.com) 22.46.00 # Hi. Wondering if someone could help me out. I opened up my Rockbox because acording to the Rock Box website, I think I'm having the JBR V1 connector problem since I only get 2 hours of life out of it 22.46.09 # Opened my Archos JBR. 22.46.53 # One one side, I have the connectors as described on the RockBox website. On the other side, I don't. Should the connectors be on both sides? 22.55.01 Join Headie [0] (~Headie@h103n2fls32o873.telia.com) 22.58.47 # Anyone know if the archos JBR V1 should have the battery connector wire on both sides of the baateries? 23.00.10 Join [IDC]Dragon [0] (~idc-drago@p50861CF7.dip.t-dialin.net) 23.36.45 Quit Stryke` (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))