--- Log for 04.04.105 Server: orwell.freenode.net Channel: #rockbox --- Nick: logbot Version: Dancer V4.16 Started: 12 days and 8 hours ago 00.00.24 # Hmm. It seems I am unable to find their current source code on the site... 00.00.42 # yes, I read commit mails 00.01.25 # http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=openneo-cvs 00.01.59 # the do all their development somewhere else and bulk-commit once every few months 00.02.19 # or so it seems at least 00.03.35 # any news on the multi codec arch.? 00.05.11 Join vol [0] (~jugga@cpe-24-194-97-147.nycap.res.rr.com) 00.05.37 Quit Rick (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)) 00.06.56 Join Rick [0] (rick@wbar25.lax1-4.28.143.213.lax1.dsl-verizon.net) 00.13.44 Join GCarrier [0] (~gcarrier@tofu.eu.org) 00.16.13 Join kergoth [0] (~kergoth@covenant.kergoth.com) 00.16.33 # Bagder: Haha, it's indeed similar. Why do they come up with that now... strange... ? ;-) 00.17.22 # well, they move in mysterious ways ;-) 00.18.43 # From looking at it, their main loop should be a bit faster (unrolled once), but their initial and final tests look like they're slower 00.20.02 # I remember that it was really difficult to get the initial test (for short strings) to perform at least with the same speed as the C function. 00.20.17 # I first had a looped version as they do. It was slower 00.21.14 Join LinusN [0] (~linus@labb.contactor.se) 00.21.20 # hi LinusN 00.21.37 # hi LinusN 00.22.56 # shalom 00.23.21 # gheh. 00.24.09 # LinusN: I finally managed to write my graphics api documentation / proposal wiki page. http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GraphicsAPI 00.26.51 # goodie 00.28.35 # Grr, next wiki spammer.... 00.40.50 Join StrathAFK [0] (~mike@dgvlwinas01pool0-a202.wi.tds.net) 00.41.29 # LinusN: hi 00.41.33 # helo 00.42.02 # LinusN: do you know what is maximum real bandwidth of USB 2.0 hi-speed channel? 00.42.12 # LinusN: in megabytes of real data 00.42.14 # 480mbit/s? 00.42.33 # yes... but those stop bits... other collision stuf... 00.42.54 # so i guess it is in the vicinity of 40Mbyte/s 00.43.07 # ok.. that is what i think too. 00.44.32 # some pages claim up to 60Mb, others say 50Mb 00.46.29 # then it is pretty good. :) 00.48.18 # btw, i have a question on SDRAM. it says that the minimum seek time for a address for Samsung ram is 5.5ns, and maximum is 1000ns. what is it depend on? 00.50.13 Quit Rick (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 00.50.52 # XShocK: "seek time"????? 00.51.10 # there is no such thing as "seek time" in SDRAM 00.51.33 # maybe you mean "access time"? 00.51.45 # CLK cycle time. 00.52.23 # well, i guess their sdram isn't made to run with a too slow clock 00.52.45 # i just saw in on http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/pub/Main/DataSheets/Samsung_K4S561632D.pdf on page 8 i think... 00.53.00 # i saw 1000ns and was very scared by it 00.53.13 # so what does it mean? 00.53.15 # in fact, with a too slow clock, all available bandwidth will be used for refresh, so there will be no time left for actuall memory access 00.53.37 # scared? 00.54.42 # i was scared since if that memory sometimes require 1000ns just to access a byte of data, it will certainly not do the job i wanted it to do. 00.54.54 # i just wanted to know what that 1000ns actually ment 00.56.18 # clk cycle time is how fast the CLK can be 00.56.37 # mmm. ok. then fine. :)) 00.57.02 Join preglow [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 00.57.25 # but all accesses are equally fast with the same CLk rate 00.58.02 # so no matter what address i choose in ram it will be accessed in the same amount of time? 00.58.10 # yes 00.58.23 # anyone know what's inside of the ifp9xx boys? 00.58.41 # the first access in a burst takes 5 clocks, and the following accesses take 1 clock each 00.59.05 # preglow: no, but it could be the philips chip 00.59.28 Quit Strath (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 00.59.35 # probably is 00.59.54 # preglow: i think i saw it somewhere. wait a sec 01.01.36 # hhm.. no sorry 01.01.38 # i want a good excuse to learn arm asm, god damnit! 01.02.16 # http://www.itime.cn/Article_Show.asp?ArticleID=3419&ArticlePage=7 01.02.39 # found something.. i don't know chineese thou.. :) 01.03.44 # i wish the table was even smaller 01.04.51 # http://www.itime.cn/UploadFiles/2004101311493811.gif 01.04.58 # the link was under it 01.05.02 # looks like the SAA7750 chipset 01.05.46 # no, wait, it's a newer one 01.05.55 # i love secretive hardware manufacturers 01.05.55 # arghh 01.07.54 Quit _Lucretia_ ("Leaving") 01.08.02 # what do we know of the dsp part in the saa7750? nothing? 01.08.29 # why do they even have a dsp part? arm should be more then capable of doing most dsp efficiently 01.09.37 # preglow: efficiently, perhaps, but the epic core is probably a lot more efficient than the arm7 01.10.12 # well, yes, dedicated dsp cores will always be more efficient for dsp than other designs, obviously 01.10.16 # we know a little about the epic core, but nothing about how to program it 01.10.22 # what do we know? 01.11.21 # we know a little about how to communicate with it, but not much more 01.11.37 # i still have a dialog with philips about it 01.12.39 # god, i wish they stopped being anal 01.12.43 # what the hell have they got to loose? 01.13.05 # i don't think philips is that secretive about it 01.13.25 # then hooray! 01.13.37 # it just isn't practical for customers to program the dsp core themselves 01.13.49 # so no customer has wanted to do it 01.13.58 Join Rick [0] (rick@wbar25.lax1-4.28.143.213.lax1.dsl-verizon.net) 01.14.12 # that's probably why the epic programmers guide wasn't released 01.14.48 # so there is still a small chance that we can get the information 01.14.53 # that would be great indeed 01.14.59 # as long as it doesn't cost philips anything 01.15.19 # they don't want to be burdened by loads of support questions 01.15.23 Join DJ_Dooms_Day [0] (~scottr@dialup-252.15.220.203.acc10-dryb-mel.comindico.com.au) 01.15.25 # well, it shouldn't provided they have the documentation in a practical form 01.15.44 # and there is a risk that the epic programmers guide doesn't exist at all 01.15.48 # indeed 01.16.14 # we'll see... 01.16.40 # would be fun, for sure 01.16.58 # indeed 01.17.19 # i love learning about new architectures 01.18.49 # can someone recomend a good source of knowledge of digital electronics? 01.18.51 # i also happen to want a flash based portable, heh 01.19.11 # XShocK: you mean an online resource for learning? 01.19.26 # online or paperprinted, any 01.19.30 # yes 01.19.36 # i have no idea... :-) 01.19.47 # heh 01.19.51 Join XavierGr [0] (~3e01ea1a@labb.contactor.se) 01.20.00 # i've got a couple of books 01.20.07 # but have no idea whether they're any good 01.20.28 # say their names anyway 01.20.32 # what do you mean by digital electronics? 01.20.43 # i guess amazon has hundreds of books about digital electronics 01.20.48 # i would have to dig in my book pile 01.21.04 # the sedra & smith one springs to mind, but that's analogue electronics as well 01.21.32 # * LinusN hasn't read a single book about digital electronics 01.21.34 # preglow: don't worry, i though that they right near you. :) 01.22.08 # XShocK: i'm sorry, i can't, i'm using a ton of books as support for my vinyl records, and the books in question are behind that arrangement, heh 01.22.37 # * preglow needs a bigger appartment 01.22.46 # but where to get that info? i had never ever thought that there is such a thing as FPGA 01.22.54 # oh, there is 01.23.11 # i've got a book on vhdl, i think 01.23.25 # i can't remember what i've sold and what i've still got 01.23.31 # :) 01.23.39 Quit XavierGr (Client Quit) 01.23.40 # XShocK, you could do worse than scour the support sites of the major semiconductor manufacturers 01.23.57 # Rushton, VHDL for Logic Synthesis 01.24.10 # they usually have reasonable downloads for manuals, application notes, white papers, demo code etc. 01.24.22 # it seems i did read a book about digital electronics after all... :-) 01.24.30 # then if you come across something you don't get, use google :) 01.24.32 # :) 01.25.11 # i don't get the difference between sram and sdram. :) 01.25.12 # for programmable logic, start with PIC chips... 01.26.09 # XShocK: static ram and dynamic ram are two very different architectures 01.26.22 # the 'd' is the difference... dynamic ram is more complex to use but cheaper because it's simpler 01.26.23 # Camilo: i have done a card emulator on pic 16f84a, it worked, but i couldn't manage it to work as i wanted because it didn't have enough speed. 01.27.02 # basically, dynamic ram can't hold the contents for very long, it has to be rewritten with the same info over and over again, called the "refresh" 01.27.14 # but both are accessed in the same amount of time, right? 01.27.25 # sram is usually faster 01.27.27 # depends on design, but no, usually not 01.27.55 # dram is accessed as a matrix, using rows and columns 01.27.55 # if you're using dynamic ram you have to consider what will refresh it etc. 01.28.19 # so you give it the row address first, then the column 01.28.28 # this slows down the accesses 01.30.10 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 01.30.27 # I don't get one more thing. this refresh process. Camilo, you said that i should manage refreshing those capacitors by myself? 01.30.31 # XShocK: google is your friend, there are lots of pages describing the basics of electronics 01.30.48 # XShocK: yes, the dram controller has to refresh the dram 01.30.56 # CPUs and microcontrollers tend to have refresh circuitry 01.31.13 # so you have to configure them to refresh according to the parameters ofthe DRAM you're using 01.31.37 # the programmer doesn't have to care about the refresh once the dram controller is set up 01.31.39 # ok. thanks.i though it does in itself. 01.31.54 # but you are constrained - usually to using the same sorts of row/column numbering for all your dram banks 01.33.38 # XShocK: actually, sdram has a self-refresh mode, but that is for powersaving purposes, when the computer sleeps 01.34.13 # LinusN: Speaking about access speeds - the sdram data path in the iriver is 32 bits wide, and 4-byte bursts are possible, correct? 01.34.23 # nope 01.34.29 # the path is 16-bit 01.34.50 # lovely 01.34.59 # yeah, isn't it? :-) 01.35.02 # so a one dword burst takes seven cycles 01.35.08 # as lame as it gets 01.35.35 # one dword = 5+1 bus cycles 01.35.48 # if a dword is 32 bits 01.36.16 # Okay, data path is 16 bits, but 4-*word* bursts are possible.... 01.36.52 # ahh, i thought the 5 cycle first access was without data read 01.37.14 # no, that includes the first word 01.37.16 # That means, if someone implements memcpy() and memset() using movem and an even number of registers, it should get a nice speedup... 01.37.30 # indeed 01.37.37 # yup 01.37.41 # so long as the move/copy is big enough 01.37.42 # Too bad my iriver still didn't arrive... 01.37.57 # amiconn: don't hold your breath 01.38.05 # night folks 01.38.09 # Camilo: nite 01.38.13 Quit Camilo ("Chatzilla 0.9.67 [Mozilla rv:1.8b2/20050309]") 01.38.13 # good night 01.38.15 # * Bagder goes to sleep as well 01.38.24 # * LinusN should sleep too 01.38.30 # * preglow is very tired 01.38.37 # and ignoring it for the third hour 01.38.45 # :-) 01.38.49 Join elinenbe [0] (trilluser@207-237-225-9.c3-0.nyr-ubr1.nyr.ny.cable.rcn.com) 01.38.50 # it's getting harder 01.39.03 # and I need to finish my Psychology outline. :) 01.39.05 # amiconn: but yes, using movem for all memory transfer is a muust, really 01.39.12 # i better go to sleep too 01.39.25 # i need to write report, code a module and apply for jobs 01.39.25 # haha 01.39.26 # XShocK: oooh, psychology...that was a long time ago... 01.39.39 # i would rather sleep 01.40.03 # :) 01.40.19 # thank god i don't have to get up very early tomorrow 01.40.37 # * LinusN will get up in about 3 hours 01.40.44 # sounds absolutely delightful 01.40.54 # i can't wait... 01.40.55 # were i you, i'd get in bed as soon as possible 01.41.06 # aye, aye, captain! 01.41.09 # with only three hours sleep, i am near suicidal when i have to get up 01.41.12 Quit elinenbe (Client Quit) 01.41.14 # * LinusN obeys and goes to sleep 01.41.19 # nite folks! 01.41.22 # night 01.41.24 # night 01.41.27 Part LinusN 01.41.28 # night 01.45.26 # one more question. how long can the data stay without refreshing? 01.46.17 # a very short time 01.46.22 # why worry about that? 01.47.48 # i want it to work on the fastest mode possible. and i know that it will stay in ram no more that 10-20ms. 01.48.18 # well, i have no idea about specific numbers 01.48.26 # but the memory caps discharge pretty fast, i think 01.49.29 # ok then. anyway it will probably will be dischanrged in that time. 01.50.50 # ok. will not bother anyone anymore. :) 01.50.50 # probably 01.50.56 # haha 01.51.11 # i want to be bothered, writing reports are boring 01.51.34 # hehe.. same in here. 02.11.26 # well 02.11.28 # tired, bed next 02.11.34 # night, all 02.11.41 Quit preglow ("leaving") 02.11.42 # night 02.11.59 # night 02.12.42 Quit Aison ("( www.nnscript.de :: NoNameScript 3.72 :: www.XLhost.de )") 02.25.44 Join Aison [0] (~hans@zux166-181.adsl.green.ch) 03.19.08 Quit Sucka ("a bird in the bush is worth two in your house") 03.19.37 Join Byron [0] (byron@63.77.203.136) 03.19.40 # hello 03.20.17 # I need some help, I put rockbox on my ondio and when I record the audio level won't go any lower than 21db 03.28.39 Quit Aison ("( www.nnscript.de :: NoNameScript 3.72 :: www.XLhost.de )") 03.30.11 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 03.56.53 Quit DMJC ("Leaving") 03.56.54 Quit Byron (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 03.57.51 # does ondio already has record function? 03.58.01 # i mean rockbox 04.06.03 Join QT_ [0] (as@area51.users.madwifi) 04.08.54 Join Rocker [0] (~youthink@67.71.34.203) 04.10.07 Part Rocker 04.19.12 Quit QT (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 04.48.56 # night all 04.49.09 Quit XShocK (" Want to be different? HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <-") 05.00.20 Quit edx (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 05.26.45 Quit Stryke` ("Friends don't let friends listen to Anti-Flag") 05.30.15 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 05.33.39 Join Byron [0] (byron@63.77.203.136) 05.33.44 # oops, I fell off 05.34.02 # anyone know why the ondio won't let me record any lower than 21db 05.35.50 # the record audio is really high and I can't turn it down 05.54.24 Quit asdsd (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 05.54.25 Quit Byron (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)) 05.58.53 Join pizza_ [0] (~pizza@rrcs-24-73-230-86.se.biz.rr.com) 05.59.29 # got a quick question. 05.59.38 # Are there any known issues with the car adapter mode? 06.00.29 # my JBR isn't pausing when power is disconnected. 06.09.19 Quit jakepdev (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 06.19.20 Join edx [0] (edx@pD9EAAE58.dip.t-dialin.net) 06.24.26 Join cYmen_ [0] (~cymen@nat-ph3-wh.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de) 06.25.48 Quit cYmen (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 06.31.38 Join bobdbob [0] (~bobdbob@ics151-142.icsincorporated.com) 06.37.03 Quit pizza_ ("[BX] "I did not have sexual relations with that client, BitchX."") 07.25.08 Join LinusN [0] (~linus@labb.contactor.se) 07.30.16 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 07.42.26 Quit GCarrier (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 07.51.09 Join matsl [0] (~matsl@1-1-4-2a.mal.sth.bostream.se) 07.52.31 Quit matsl (Remote closed the connection) 07.59.17 Join Byron [0] (byron@63.77.203.136) 08.05.20 # I fell off again 08.05.30 # anyone answered my question while I was gone? 08.05.49 # eh? 08.06.07 # recording level? 08.06.27 # yeah 08.06.30 # we log all irc activity 08.06.37 # when I record the lowest it'll go is 21 db 08.06.43 # excellent 08.07.05 # check the IRC link on the rockbox site 08.07.14 # anyway, nobody answered it 08.07.18 # oops 08.07.19 # so i'll answer now 08.07.21 # can you? 08.07.24 # YaY! 08.07.34 # no, the 21dB limit is in the hardware 08.07.53 # nothing we can do about it 08.07.55 # ohh man, that sucks, all of my recordings are too hot 08.08.14 # well, glad to know that the problem has been acknowledged 08.08.35 # you're not the only one with that problem 08.08.59 # is there a way to tell rockbox not to change that aspect of the archos... if it works fine in the original firmware that is. 08.09.20 # i repeat: the 21dB limit is in the hardware 08.10.03 # bummer, well thanks for the help and I hope someone comes up with some sort of audio compression or something to bypass the hardware limitation, but I doubt that can happen anyway. 08.10.22 # thanks Linus, you've been a big help 08.10.32 # you're welcome 08.10.41 # I can't find anything refering to this problem on google so I am glad I found someone who knows what is up 08.11.11 # hang on 08.12.19 # you record with the builtin mic, right? 08.12.28 # yeah 08.12.41 # http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ#Q65_What_kind_of_mic_can_I_conne 08.14.03 # thanks 08.15.48 # is there a firmware upgrade for PMA400 08.16.54 # what's that? 08.17.04 # the new archos that is a pda 08.17.14 Join Zagor [0] (foobar@h14n2fls31o265.telia.com) 08.17.29 # no, we have no plans for the pma400...yet 08.17.36 # morning Zagor 08.18.40 # hi. anyone got any ideas how to get rid of the twiki registration spam? manual screening is all I can think of :-( 08.19.08 # me too 08.19.45 # we can of course look for links in the user topic 08.19.55 # and alert the admins 08.20.08 # but not everyone adds links either 08.20.18 # it's a start 08.20.42 # Hmm, that would disallow links to someone's homepage.... 08.20.48 # Morning, btw :) 08.20.53 # not disallow 08.21.14 # just alert the admins when the topic is added or changed 08.21.22 # via email 08.21.40 # we check it and approve or delete, manually 08.22.00 # it's not that we're swamped with wiki spam...yet 08.22.07 # how about a rockbox-related question on the form? 08.22.23 # well we do get several bogus registrations per day. it's becoming a burden. 08.22.28 # good idea 08.23.57 # hehe, how about "which FAQ entry is about...blabla?" :-) 08.25.15 # or just "which color is the Rockbox logo?" 08.25.34 # anyway, are the wiki spam entries purely automated? 08.25.50 # no, they're manual. i tried changing the form and they still come. 08.27.00 # ok, so the questions have to be somewhat hard 08.27.06 # yes 08.28.41 # "name three of the Rockbox project staff members" :-) 08.29.10 # spelling would be a problem 08.29.37 # or a dropdown list of all wiki users 08.29.47 # multi-choice 08.30.50 # which of these 5 platforms is *not* supported by rockbox? 08.31.29 # reminds me of the rockbox-trivia irc channel :-) 08.31.37 # :) 08.41.48 # is there a software mod that you guys could do to the rockbox fm 20 so that the line-in would accept a microphone? 08.42.16 # I've got an amplifier and a mic and the archos in a fanny pack right now, but it'd be nice if I could get rid of the amp 08.42.41 # the internal mic picks up all of that nasty hard drive noise, makes it useless 08.42.47 Join ashridah [0] (ashridah@220-253-123-13.VIC.netspace.net.au) 08.43.14 # Byron: can't be done. you need the amplifier. 08.43.40 # D'oh 08.44.02 # any way to make the hard drive stop spinning up during recordings, maybe use some sort of memory buffer? 08.44.25 # rockbox doesn't spin up until the memory is full 08.44.31 # we already use all the memory we have, but when it's full we need to spin up the disk to store it 08.45.19 # yea, bummer 08.45.33 # it spins up every 3 mins or so, sometimes more frequantly 08.46.01 # yup, that sounds about right 08.46.13 # Byron: if you set the recording settings to record to the current directory, it won't spin up when you start the recording 08.47.25 # or you could buy an Ondio, which is a flash player/recorder, also supported by rockbox 08.48.45 # right, but the audio won't go any lower than 21db 08.48.54 # so I'm gonna get messy audio quality one way or the other 08.49.07 # the best way to record so far, is to have an external mic 08.49.19 # yes 08.49.20 # that will always be the case 08.51.19 # "No need to put lcd_write() in the IRAM since it has to be slow." 08.51.20 # ;-) 08.51.25 # (from OpenNeo) 08.52.24 # i wonder why they removed the TOC support 08.52.52 # they do odd things 08.56.46 # the commen in the new code says "No TOC exists" 08.56.48 # comment 08.56.55 # even weirder 08.57.13 # indeed 08.57.25 # it makes me suspect they don't know what they 08.57.27 # 're doing 08.59.15 # "No need to support HD bigger than 2 TB" 08.59.17 # hehe 09.04.33 # maybe they're trying to save memory? 09.04.52 # yes, possibly 09.05.09 # 400 bytes per id3 entry...oooooh :-) 09.05.11 # their heap is growing so they need to cut off code ;-) 09.05.16 # 100 bytes 09.05.53 # 64KB for heap is a quite a lot when you only have 256 09.06.03 # yup 09.06.15 # why did they add heap anyway? 09.06.16 # they're stuck in heap hell 09.06.21 # Zagor: m m m malloc 09.06.32 # yeah, but what are they using it for? 09.06.43 # nothing useful 09.06.45 # same thing as other heap junkies 09.06.55 # various bits and pieces? 09.06.56 # I saw that theres apparently some primitive mpeg playback code on the CVS, does this mean we're close to getting mp3 playback? :) 09.06.59 Quit ashridah (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 09.07.02 # Zagor: yeps, just random stuff 09.07.22 # DJ_Dooms_Day: the mpeg playback you see is the archos playback code 09.07.27 # how very foolish 09.07.30 # -_- 09.07.34 # lies! 09.07.48 # Zagor: they do a lot of things we wouldn't... 09.07.59 # lies? 09.08.29 # Im in denial, leave me be 09.10.18 # * Bagder pats DJ_Dooms_Day on his head. "Ok my son, now go and play with the other kids" ;*) 09.17.57 Join Lynx_ [0] (HydraIRC@134.95.189.59) 09.21.08 Join Schnueff [0] (~mah@134.96.247.232) 09.30.19 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 09.30.41 Join bobTHC [0] (~foo@l07v-6-110.d1.club-internet.fr) 09.30.41 Quit Bagder (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)) 09.31.13 # hi all! 09.37.48 Join Bagder [0] (~daniel@1-1-5-26a.hud.sth.bostream.se) 09.39.57 Quit gromit (Nick collision from services.) 09.40.15 Join gromit` [0] (~gromit@ras75-5-82-234-244-69.fbx.proxad.net) 09.41.18 # morning Bagder 09.41.26 # hey 09.44.24 Join kurzhaarrocker [0] (~Phil@p3E9C2EAB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) 09.45.15 # LinusN you're evil. Instead of commiting the triggered recording patch you made a cvs conflict. :) 09.46.17 # muhahahahaaaaa 09.46.19 # * Bagder verifies that LinusN is evil 09.46.35 # kurzhaarrocker: sorry about that 09.46.51 # no problem. Rockbox lives and thats good. 09.55.42 # It was extremly easy to fix anyway - just an additional include 09.56.31 # * LinusN updates the patch tracker 09.58.25 # Äh? What do you mean with update? It certainly won't mean you update the patch of triggered recording? 09.58.42 # i just did 09.58.52 # ups. Thanks! :) 10.04.03 # * LinusN is installing the peak meter patch on his recorder 10.04.20 # Hooray! :D 10.04.26 # * kurzhaarrocker jumps up and down in joy 10.06.48 # i like the new trigger bar 10.08.27 # * kurzhaarrocker searches something to wag with 10.08.48 # is the trigger enabled by default? 10.09.16 # I don't think so. It shouldn't be. Triggered recording is something sepcial 10.09.45 # seems to be 10.09.49 # But in my configs it is stored that I it records triggered -> I don't know the default by heart any more. 10.10.50 # seems like the cursor for the gain isn't drawn in the right place 10.11.47 # it seems to be correctly drawn when the cursor is an inverted bar 10.11.58 # but not when it's an arrow 10.12.40 # Hm. I should have noticed that. My fault. Unfortunately my batteries are in an external charger right now -> can't verify. 10.22.35 # did you ditch the idea with the blinking led while waiting to trigger? 10.23.28 # No. It should blink. 10.24.01 # it doesn't for me 10.28.29 Join ashridah [0] (ashridah@220-253-121-18.VIC.netspace.net.au) 10.29.37 Quit Ka (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 10.32.41 # The code that blinks the led in TRIG_STEADY state is in recording.c, line 388. I'll verify what happened as soon as my batteries are charged. 10.34.01 # Hm. When the thing is prerecording - is (mpeg_stat & MPEG_STATUS_RECORD) == true? 10.35.06 # no 10.35.49 # then MPEG_STATUS_PRERECORD is set 10.36.04 # That's what I thought. 10.38.06 # maybe i misunderstood 10.38.27 # it only blinks during the trig duration period 10.38.38 # That is the intension 10.38.48 # and not just when the trigger is armed, which i thought it would do 10.39.13 # my mistake 10.39.25 Join Patr3ck [0] (~patr3ck@pD9ECF52C.dip.t-dialin.net) 10.39.44 # It was a useful feature to be able to distinguish wether the trigger threshold has been reached from the distance. 10.40.40 # It is only useful for long trigger times though. 10.41.56 # is the wiki manual up to date? 10.42.41 # no 10.42.45 Join bzerk86 [0] (~Brian@66.cust16.sa.dsl.ozemail.com.au) 10.42.47 # <- meeting :( 10.43.33 Nick QT_ is now known as QT (as@area51.users.madwifi) 10.56.54 # kurzhaarrocker: i wish you could have make it compile in the simulator... 11.00.30 Join Quelsaruk [0] (~kvirc@85.48.43.61) 11.00.33 # morning 11.00.37 # moo 11.00.42 # :) 11.05.19 Join DJ_Dooms_Day|AF [0] (~scottr@203.220.52.89) 11.10.02 Part kurzhaarrocker 11.10.51 Quit bzerk86 ("Leaving") 11.13.14 # * LinusN just committed the triggered recording patch 11.24.01 Quit DJ_Dooms_Day (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 11.27.11 Nick kergoth is now known as kergoth`zzz (~kergoth@covenant.kergoth.com) 11.30.20 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 11.48.55 Join DMJC [0] (~James@220-245-171-89.tpgi.com.au) 11.48.55 Quit Byron (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 11.56.04 Part LinusN 11.56.22 Join Lost-ash [0] (ashridah@220-253-123-107.VIC.netspace.net.au) 11.57.49 Quit ashridah (Nick collision from services.) 11.58.58 Nick Lost-ash is now known as ashridah (ashridah@220-253-123-107.VIC.netspace.net.au) 12.01.00 Join Ka [0] (~tkirk@pcp0010733332pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 12.01.18 Nick kergoth`zzz is now known as kergoth (~kergoth@covenant.kergoth.com) 12.06.15 # Argh, Linus is gone! :-/ 12.12.44 Join Lost-ash [0] (ashridah@220.253.123.107) 12.12.45 Quit ashridah (Connection reset by peer) 12.13.46 # ping Lost-ash 12.23.43 Nick Lost-ash is now known as ashridah (ashridah@220.253.123.107) 12.26.17 Join LinusN [0] (~linus@labb.contactor.se) 12.26.54 # network maintenance... 12.30.17 Join Aison [0] (~hans@zux166-181.adsl.green.ch) 12.35.50 Join DJ_Dooms_Day [0] (~scottr@dialup-36.79.221.203.acc15-dryb-mel.comindico.com.au) 12.36.26 Quit Quelsaruk ("KVIrc 3.2.0 'Marmalade'") 12.39.44 Join preglow [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 12.39.48 Join quelsaruk [0] (~kvirc@80.103.131.254) 12.43.49 # LinusN: The triggered recording patch broke the ondio fm build... 12.44.17 # ... and your fix doesn't work (it obviously can't), but instead breaks the advanced sound settings for ondio sp... 12.44.21 Quit DJ_Dooms_Day|AF (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 12.44.31 # that's really funny, because it works when i build locally 12.44.49 # The problem is not related to the mas types, but to the button handling 12.44.56 # i know 12.45.07 # my "oops" commit wasn't related to the build error 12.45.27 # It wasn't? 12.46.02 # no, it was because i accidentally added advanced peak meter recording settings to the SP 12.46.05 # The build obviously cannot work, because the button assignment is hardcoded, and the Ondio doesn't have PLAY nor F2 12.46.55 # do you have any good ideas what buttons we could use? 12.49.04 # I did not yet try the triggered recording, so I don't know the details. But from looking at the code, I wonder why it defines its own menu function instead of using the existing one 12.49.36 # The USB handling is just plain wrong 12.50.01 # ah, yes 12.51.26 Quit ashridah (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 12.52.25 Join hibou [0] (~a4810127@labb.contactor.se) 12.55.00 # Btw, the 'Oops' commit seems unnecessary to me. The code section in question is protected by #ifdef HAVE_RECORDING anyway, and the MAS3539 cannot record... 12.55.08 # true 12.58.26 # Hmm, I need to have a look at the triggered recording myself. Can only do that in the evening, and it's too bad I don't always have access to an Ondio FM 12.59.04 # hmmm, ondio has no play key... 12.59.33 # i guess the "cancel" function has to be disabled on the ondio then 12.59.44 # If at all possible, I would prefer it to use the standard rockbox menu system. That would ensure consistent operation with the other menus, and also most likely save some code size 12.59.50 # (pressing OFF to cancel the settings) 12.59.58 # amiconn: agreed 13.08.01 Join ceebmoj [0] (~5189b144@labb.contactor.se) 13.08.11 # hi 13.10.04 Quit Ka (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 13.10.34 # I have been reading the Audio API stuff has any progres been made on it? 13.10.42 # not really 13.11.51 # i'm working on restructuring the audio code to prepare for the new code 13.12.15 # who is working on it? 13.12.21 Join Ka [0] (~tkirk@pcp0010733332pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 13.12.28 # are thay about to talk to? 13.14.10 # i am working on it 13.14.29 # restructuring the code, that is 13.16.20 # but yes, we are all here, so if you have any questions, just shoot 13.18.09 # ok basicly the API are to be dinamicly loaded as required based on the trackes that are to be played 13.18.40 # the codecs, yes 13.19.31 # will ther be a limet in the number of codecs that can be loded or will the buffer be filled up with song dater and Codecs untill it is full to reduce disk activerty 13.19.40 # sory for the spelling by the way. 13.20.03 Join Sucka [0] (~NNSCRIPT@host81-156-214-58.range81-156.btcentralplus.com) 13.22.05 # we have thought about a limit of two codecs 13.23.04 # how much ram would a typical codec utilize? 13.23.22 # the problem is internal ram 13.23.43 # it's too slow? 13.23.48 # a "typical" codec could use a few hundred K 13.23.50 # no, the codecs need to use internal ram 13.23.54 # for speed reasons 13.24.02 # and we only have 96K iram 13.24.09 # exactly 13.24.20 # ok so you would set a side part of the memory area to acomedate a and the apropreat codecs would be loded and the disk would be hit again if ther are other file timpes in the buffer befor it was empty? 13.24.36 # yes 13.26.02 # so why not load all the codecs in to the buffer along with the files to be played and then load the codec from the buffer in to the slot as and when it is required? that way you can have as many codecs as you like fom the disk to the buffer in one disk hit? 13.26.20 # ceebmoj: because the internal ram is so small 13.26.36 # and we don't want to relocate the codecs dynamically 13.26.39 # well, yes, but we can copy data and code to iram just as its needed 13.26.45 # preglow: true 13.26.51 # that's a small operation 13.27.05 # that's in fact exactly what they will do... 13.27.24 # the relocation issue is bigger 13.27.46 # relocation? 13.28.26 # relocation == translate all jump addresses in the code to make it run in different places in RAM 13.28.41 # maybe i misunderstood you 13.28.55 # i think i did 13.28.56 # you patch the program in-ram? 13.28.57 # i thought we planned on just having two different statically linked version? 13.29.02 # preglow: yes 13.29.32 # but preloading them, we'd need to load both versions 13.29.39 # i think ceebmoj talks about loading the codec into the audio buffer, and then move it to the appropriate slot when it is to be executed 13.29.39 # i think the codec loading will have to be split up somehow anyway, the metadata part of the codecs will probably have to be loaded at all times 13.29.42 # or perhaps not 13.29.47 # Bagder: yes 13.30.02 # why is this a problem can you not hold two slots open at a fixed address and the just coppy to thowes places that way ther is no dinamik linking problems 13.30.04 # LinusN: we could probably figure out in which slot it'll go into 13.30.15 # Bagder that is what I am trying to say 13.30.18 # ceebmoj: that's our intention 13.30.22 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 13.30.24 # but 13.30.27 # if you skip a sonf 13.30.29 # song 13.30.31 # it'll break 13.30.36 # yes 13.31.19 # ought to teach you not to use too many codecs!! 13.31.25 # :-) 13.31.27 # hehe 13.31.40 # why would skiping a song caruse a problem? 13.31.43 # "too many codecs in use error, remove a few and try again" 13.31.48 # :-) 13.32.04 # ceebmoj: because then you'd use the other slot than what was first believed 13.32.07 # Reminds me of windows 13.32.36 # probably should have a codec cache of selectable size 13.32.39 # How does the database browser thing work? It loads the entire DB instead of every dir entry? 13.32.40 # as we'd have two linked versions of all codecs 13.32.41 # loading them all is out of the question 13.33.19 # Bagder: is it a big hassle to patch the calls during runtime? 13.33.23 # we could of course also make the plugin format fully relocatable, and do the fixups right before it is to be used :) 13.33.26 # dwihno: yes 13.34.10 # I imagine players with insane amounts of memory 13.34.31 # Let's say 64 megs or such 13.34.47 # i think 32 megs is pretty much, to be honest 13.34.51 # me too 13.35.12 # Next you guys will say that it should be enough for everyone ;) 13.35.16 # haha 13.35.18 # :-) 13.35.49 # Hm 13.35.54 # How big will the pcm buffer be? 13.36.10 # as big as we can have it 13.36.13 # ahh 13.36.14 # forget that 13.36.16 # I was thinking stupid thoughts... Such as keeping pcm data in the 32 meg buffer instead of the compressed ;) 13.36.37 # dwihno: go away 13.36.44 # hehe 13.36.55 Part dwihno 13.36.55 # I sumed that when a file was to be played you would check the tipe and ues the codec that is requied that way when you skip a song you would just ues the codek that it requires this would stop skip problems that you talk about 13.37.00 Join dwihno [0] (~dw@81.8.224.89) 13.37.05 # Nah, you won't get rid of me that easy ;) 13.37.08 # ceebmoj: yes 13.37.17 # ceebmoj: but we intend to have two "slots" for the codecs 13.37.23 # to allow two codecs simultaneously 13.37.28 # linked to fixed addresses 13.37.37 Join ashridah [0] (ashridah@220-253-123-55.VIC.netspace.net.au) 13.38.01 # * preglow is contemplating a one slot version with more iram available for each codec 13.38.21 # so why not load as many codecs as you can in to the buffer from the disk in one disk hit? 13.38.31 # preglow: perhaps that's the viable solution 13.38.35 # because they consume space? 13.38.56 # because you'd have to load both versions of all codecs as well 13.39.03 # Bagder: i think it should be easily configurable, at least, only use i can think of for two slots are speaking menus and such 13.39.03 # assuming a two-slot approach 13.39.05 # but if you have many difrent file tipes say in a play list you will get better batry life this way 13.39.08 # perhaps allow the user to specify one or two 'common' codecs that should be loaded by default, and keep the rest as plugins 13.39.22 # in fact, a single slot, along with ceebmoj's idea could be the way to go 13.39.25 # ceebmoj: not necessarily 13.39.47 # LinusN: then what if audio from two sources are to be mixed simultaneously? 13.39.50 # single slot will of course prevent cross-fading between two codecs 13.39.53 Join R3nTiL [0] (~zorroz@217.30.249.181) 13.39.58 # not necessarily 13.40.04 # badger why do you feal you would get wors battry life? 13.40.10 # well, no, but depends heavily on efficient codecs 13.40.15 # true 13.40.19 # given enough buffer... 13.40.24 # have you guys checked how often the iriver spins a disk during regular mp3 playback? 13.40.32 # dwihno: too often 13.40.35 # der Disk spinnst wie ein kartoffel! 13.40.40 # preglow: every track? 13.40.42 # the iriver is not a good example 13.40.47 # i think crossfading should be implemented purely on a pcm level 13.40.53 # dwihno: no, but still too often, i dont think the iriver firmware ever loads incomplete tracks 13.40.54 # it reads the id3 data on every track 13.40.56 # my iriver spins up about twice for an album 13.41.01 # or something 13.41.26 # ceebmoj: hell, do you use 64kbps files or somethig? 13.41.27 # hm, perhaps they dig it out from ram come to think of it 13.41.37 # Bagder: it doesn't spin up for each song, at least 13.41.42 # true 13.41.48 # but it is dead slow on showing id3 info 13.41.55 # that it is 13.41.55 # for a new song 13.42.44 # no ogg 145 I think 13.42.54 # I thought about the JoS players using rockbox 13.42.56 # that would be swell 13.43.02 # but somebody said something about the hardware, no? 13.43.09 # Id3 tags take 2 to 5 seconds to sho up 13.43.29 # dwihno: i have no idea what hardware is in the Jens Of Korea players 13.43.38 # :-) 13.43.39 # jhahah 13.44.03 # Didn't they at least develop the sw? 13.44.25 Join asdsd [0] (asdsd@h-67-100-33-31.miatflad.dynamic.covad.net) 13.44.42 # I don't think so 13.44.54 # shame on them! 13.45.03 DBUG Enqueued KICK asdsd 13.45.03 # 1010,15good morning guys 13.45.08 # but anyway 13.45.19 # a one slot system will surely break speaking menus? 13.45.26 # 1010,15oh hey preglow 13.45.31 *** Alert Mode level 1 13.45.31 # 1010,15hows it coming on the iriver? 13.45.33 # +b, anyone? 13.45.38 # not if they are pcm 13.45.39 # i can't stand the highlight 13.45.55 *** Alert Mode level 2 13.45.55 # 1010,15ill get rid of it 13.45.58 # asdsd: you are aware your text is unreadable? 13.46.09 # LinusN: ahh, no, but they are usually mp3, no? 13.46.10 Ctcp Ignored 1 channel CTCP requests in 0 seconds at the last flood 13.46.10 # * Bagder ignores such IRC crap 13.46.11 # preglow: i can read his text 13.46.21 # it's cyan on a gray background here 13.46.24 # a very lovely combination 13.46.32 # hehe 13.46.39 # then change your background :-) 13.46.41 # haha 13.46.43 # never! 13.46.49 # or disable mirc colors 13.46.59 # i prefer a black background for everything 13.47.06 # i'll look into how to fix that in irssi 13.47.09 *** Alert Mode level 3 13.47.09 # 1010,00now? 13.47.10 # not a bad idea anyhow 13.47.14 # which is the sensible thing to do in all occasions 13.47.17 # light cyan on white! 13.47.21 # mirc is evil 13.47.31 # asdsd: why not using plain text without colour schemes?? 13.47.32 # :D 13.47.32 *** Alert Mode level 4 13.47.32 # 1010,00beter? 13.47.42 *** Alert Mode level 5 13.47.42 # 1010,00i don't know how to set it to use a default font 13.47.42 # i use kvirc, better than mirc :) 13.47.48 *** Alert Mode level 6 13.47.48 # 1010,00im using Trillian 3 pro on ir 13.47.49 # haha, ok 13.47.50 *** Alert Mode level 7 13.47.50 # 1010,00irc* 13.48.27 *** Alert Mode level 8 13.48.27 # 1010,00trill 3 used to let me choose the ofnt based on platform 13.48.30 *** Alert Mode level 9 13.48.30 # 1010,00trill 2* 13.48.51 *** Alert Mode level 10 13.48.51 # 1010,00lol aynhow i just wantd to know hows it coming on the iriver 13.49.07 # steadily forward... 13.49.23 *** Alert Mode level 11 13.49.23 # 1010,00nice 13.49.26 # asdsd: the cyan is still annoying... 13.49.35 *** Alert Mode level 12 13.49.35 # 1010,00im checking the homepage and it mentions u got rolo working 13.49.47 # yes 13.50.28 *** Alert Mode level 13 13.50.28 # 1010,00so we'll be able to boot into the original or rockbox firmware depending how what mood were in? 13.50.41 # that we already do 13.50.55 *** Alert Mode level 14 13.50.55 # 1010,00so then what does rolo provide? 13.51.05 *** Alert Mode level 15 13.51.05 # 1010,00i just read this: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/RoLo thats all 13.51.10 Quit quelsaruk ("KVIrc 3.2.0 'Marmalade'") 13.51.10 # rolo loading and starting another rockbox from disk 13.51.21 # instead of rebooting 13.51.22 # +is 13.51.51 # reboot only loads a fixed file name, rolo can load whatever using the right extension 13.53.13 *** Alert Mode level 16 13.53.13 # 1010,00oh i see 13.53.15 *** Alert Mode level 17 13.53.15 # 1010,00sweet 13.53.37 # very handy for developers 13.54.21 *** Alert Mode level 18 13.54.21 # 1010,00why r u guys adopting my color? 13.54.30 # i'm not 13.54.40 # adopting? 13.55.01 *** Alert Mode level 19 13.55.01 # 1010,00ur all using my color now wtf 13.55.06 # no we don't 13.55.10 # your client is crap 13.55.11 *** Alert Mode level 20 13.55.11 # 1010,00argh trillian is annoying 13.55.32 # i second that 13.55.40 *** Alert Mode level 21 13.55.40 # 1010,00*goes back to mirc* 13.55.51 Mode "#rockbox +o LinusN " by ChanServ (ChanServ@services.) 13.55.57 # use xchat-2 13.55.57 # mirc *invented* those colors 13.56.07 # thus it is the evil itself 13.56.25 *** Alert Mode level 22 13.56.25 # 1010,00ive been using this shade of this font color for nearly 5 years now 13.56.27 *** Alert Mode level 23 13.56.27 # 1010,00ill never change it 13.56.50 # i have set my client to ignore those silly mirc colors 13.56.59 # me too 13.57.15 *** Alert Mode level 24 13.57.15 # 1010,00great 13.57.18 # woot 13.57.21 # i can read you 13.57.21 Part asdsd 13.57.28 Join dadasdsad [0] (asdsd@h-67-100-33-31.miatflad.dynamic.covad.net) 13.57.30 # there 13.57.34 # good old mirc 13.57.42 # s/good// 13.57.49 # does iriver has a greyscale yet? 13.57.51 # sure beats trillian, apparently, heh 13.58.12 # well, no, not in cvs 13.58.14 # no greyscale yet 13.58.17 # but there is an incomplete patch around 13.59.22 # oh man if it takes that long to make a greyscale pallete itll prolly take longe rto make a color one 13.59.42 # development do requires someone to do the work 13.59.45 # oddly enough 13.59.48 # it's more the fact that rockbox never was intended for anything but black and white 13.59.56 # this time around we'll probably be more prepared for colour 13.59.57 # dadasdsad: you think the palette is the problem? 14.00.12 # yeah? 14.00.18 # it's not :) 14.00.25 # besides im sure that colors isn't a real priority right now right? 14.00.25 # you obviously aren't a programmer 14.00.59 # im a computer enthusiast 14.01.46 Join webguest27 [0] (~5386b0f9@labb.contactor.se) 14.02.08 Quit webguest27 (Client Quit) 14.03.06 # well im sure u guys ar emore interested in making the sound work rather than the display right 14.04.00 # damn right 14.04.03 # indeedo 14.04.26 Quit lostlogic ("Going to the moon") 14.06.28 # but anywho 14.06.39 # if cross fading is to be done with very large buffers and prebuffering 14.06.50 # where do we get the buffers from? just reserve them for this purpose at all times? 14.07.03 # a crossfade can be pretty long 14.07.06 # perhaps a "crossfade" setting? 14.07.16 *** Alert Mode OFF 14.08.12 # but yes, it sure means we can utilize the iram better 14.08.20 # which is always good 14.08.32 # there's still the voice issue... 14.08.36 # but it also requires the codecs are all a certain percentage above realtime 14.08.48 # above 200 14.09.46 # not with pcm buffer crossfade 14.10.09 # or you mean the voice? 14.10.13 # no, i mean crossfade 14.10.31 # if we crossfade in the pcm buffer, we only run one codec at a time 14.10.45 # the same cpu time that usually had to accomodate one codec, now has to accomodate two, not at once, but the same resources nonetheless 14.11.42 # well, we still need very fast codecs, or the batteries won't last very long 14.11.48 # yes, indeed 14.11.55 # they should be well above 200% 14.12.01 # so it's not really a problem, no 14.12.03 # absolutely 14.12.48 # are the codecs runing at 200% or is ther the scope to get them to run that fast? 14.12.58 # at least 200% 14.13.04 # but not all codecs are there yet 14.13.05 # i've got one at about 200% in some cases 14.13.27 # flac probably is there as well, can't remember if i've tried it without disk writing 14.13.33 # but i need to go now 14.13.35 # later, all 14.13.39 # cu 14.13.41 Quit preglow ("leaving") 14.14.17 # i think sacrificing memory for crossfading isn't such a bad tradeoff 14.15.20 # sounds fair 14.15.21 # we could easily spare a meg or two 14.15.48 # 5 secs of 44100 pcm audio is roughly 800k 14.16.05 # 5 secs cross-fade should be enough for everyone 14.16.10 # ;-) 14.16.15 Quit R3nTiL () 14.16.16 # heh 14.16.17 # reboot time... 14.16.19 Part LinusN 14.20.12 # did anyone ever work out what the bottleneck was with vorbis? 14.20.18 Join Patr3ck_ [0] (~patr3ck@pD9ECF24A.dip.t-dialin.net) 14.21.46 Join jakepdev [0] (~jakepdev@pool-68-163-51-71.phil.east.verizon.net) 14.26.25 Join bytemission [0] (~d4ca6bde@labb.contactor.se) 14.27.56 Join LinusN [0] (~linus@labb.contactor.se) 14.28.46 Quit bytemission (Client Quit) 14.29.53 Quit ceebmoj ("CGI:IRC") 14.32.07 Join webguest11 [0] (~d4ca6bde@labb.contactor.se) 14.32.53 Quit webguest11 (Client Quit) 14.34.41 Quit Patr3ck (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 14.34.48 Join Lost-ash [0] (ashridah@220-253-121-134.VIC.netspace.net.au) 14.35.32 Quit ashridah (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 14.43.13 Join bytemission [0] (~bytemissi@212.202.107.222) 14.43.26 # hi 14.44.13 # anybody around? 14.44.26 # yeps 14.44.40 # ah, cool. sorry, but i'm new to irc 14.45.21 # i got a question about the iriver ihp-120 hardware. perhaps somebody can help me. 14.45.26 # shoot 14.45.39 # i need to know some of the caps on the mainboard 14.45.44 # its C90 14.45.48 # and C99 14.46.10 # does anybody know which capacity and current they have 14.46.32 # would be so nice. i posted in the rockbox-forum this question 2 days ago 14.46.44 # but got as answer that i should post it here ;) 14.47.09 # hang on 14.47.30 # oki 14.49.26 # if more information is required i can post it. just ask 14.50.09 Join MoosCamaro [0] (MoosCamaro@m214.net81-66-158.noos.fr) 14.50.30 # hey all 14.50.40 Join lolo-laptop [0] (~lostlogic@68.251.84.226) 14.50.48 # hi 14.51.25 # bytemission: i'm having trouble measuring the capacitance with my multimeter 14.51.48 # hm, shit 14.52.22 # i would measure them myself, but i got no multimeter for caps measuring 14.52.36 # what kind of trouble? 14.53.17 # mu multimeter just says 0.00 :-) 14.54.08 # hm. not nice ;) 14.54.22 # they are propably pretty big 14.54.53 # what is the biggest you can measure? 14.55.43 # not sure 14.56.19 # did you blow U28 too? 14.56.29 # i think not 14.56.41 # what did you do? 14.56.41 # it looks pretty nice, but i haven't checked 14.57.11 # c90 anmd c99 are visibly damaged 14.57.27 # i didn't checked anything else. 14.57.52 # i think i will have a lot to do ;9 14.58.08 # perhaps this evening i will have more information 14.58.53 # the guy, i bought the unit from, told me that they used a wrong powersupply for charging. 14.59.04 # from this time the unit was out of order 15.00.03 # a fairly common fault 15.00.55 # yes, so to say 15.01.07 # lots of people fry their irivers that way 15.01.12 # how can i test U28? 15.01.41 # measure the voltage on pin 3 15.01.53 # it should be 1.8V 15.01.53 # they should built in a fuse 15.02.17 # in retrospect, yes they should 15.02.32 # but people really should take more care 15.02.47 # hm. if i connect the dameged unit to the right power supply i will have 1.8V on this pin? is this right? 15.03.00 # no 15.03.23 # U28 generates the 1.8V to the CPU, from the battery power 15.03.24 # how to test this? 15.03.38 # try to turn it on, and measure the voltage 15.03.40 # okay, i have to connect a working battery... 15.04.03 # but if i would turn it on it does nothing, usually 15.04.21 # i will test this later 15.04.31 # i think your U28 is broken, but it might not be the only thing 15.05.11 # i know. but perhaps i have luck and only the U28 + C90 + C99 are damaged. 15.05.20 # is the green led on when you connect the charger? 15.05.30 # no. the unit makes nothing. 15.05.38 # U28 can be ordered from digikey btw 15.05.59 # nothing? then maybe U15 is dead too 15.06.03 # no light, no sounds (from spinning hardrive), just nothing 15.06.19 # U15 is the charging circuit 15.06.24 # uh, it ssems to me that i speak to an expert... 15.06.45 # well, i drew the schematics on the rockbox site 15.06.52 # bytemission: LinusN probably knows the hardware on a level approaching iriver's engineers 15.06.55 # ah, okay... 15.07.03 # and i have spent some time researching the power circuitry 15.07.04 # if not exceeding, in some cases :) 15.07.25 # i should update the schematics... 15.07.49 Nick Lost-ash is now known as ashridah (ashridah@220-253-121-134.VIC.netspace.net.au) 15.11.00 # what kind of chip are U28 and U15? can't read anything on them... 15.13.06 # U15 is a texas Instruments TPS61020 15.13.23 # U28 is a Linear LTC3405 15.13.41 # LTC3405ES6 to be exact 15.14.33 # thank you so much. it's so cool that i found this irc 15.14.54 # you're welcome 15.16.57 # but i think i will have much more questions these days ... 15.17.02 # oops, i was wrong about U15 15.17.47 # okay. 15.18.22 # it's a texas Instruments BQ24022 15.19.14 # thanks 15.19.19 # you're welcome 15.19.53 # please return and report your progress 15.21.14 # That's understood. 15.21.37 Join webguest56 [0] (~5189b144@labb.contactor.se) 15.27.21 Quit dadasdsad ("—I-n-v-i-s-i-o-n— 2.0 Build 3515") 15.27.36 Join rasher [0] (~3e4f4094@labb.contactor.se) 15.29.35 Quit webguest56 ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 15.30.25 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 15.35.43 Quit rasher ("CGI:IRC") 15.35.55 Join rasher [0] (~3e4f4094@labb.contactor.se) 15.39.33 # merf 15.42.06 Join F1^Aison [0] (~hans@zux166-181.adsl.green.ch) 15.46.55 # gotta go 15.46.57 # * ashridah looks through the logs. 15.46.58 # cu guys 15.47.02 Join Aison` [0] (~hans@zux166-181.adsl.green.ch) 15.47.02 # hm. no-one answered about vorbis 15.47.08 # did anyone work out the bottleneck, or is it still dead slow? 15.47.32 # nobody has worked on it 15.48.04 # right 15.48.53 Quit Aison (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 15.48.59 Part LinusN 15.51.26 Quit F1^Aison (Operation timed out) 15.58.04 Join GCarrier [0] (~gcarrier@tofu.eu.org) 16.00.52 Quit ashridah ("Leaving") 16.03.28 Part MoosCamaro 16.07.44 Join Aison [0] (~hans@zux166-181.adsl.green.ch) 16.14.20 Quit Aison` (Operation timed out) 16.18.22 Join t0mas [0] (~Tomas@ip503c08d1.speed.planet.nl) 16.21.14 # hi 16.22.19 # hmm, anyone know a good place to order an iskin and that battery for the iriver ? 16.30.10 Quit Zagor ("Client exiting") 16.47.04 Quit GCarrier ("Leaving") 17.01.20 Join XShocK [0] (~cddef002@labb.contactor.se) 17.11.08 # hi XShocK 17.15.49 # hi 17.30.27 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 17.32.23 Quit einhirn ("Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org") 17.32.33 Join einhirn [0] (Miranda@bsod.rz.tu-clausthal.de) 17.33.23 # gotta go 17.33.29 Quit XShocK ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 17.36.56 Join matsl [0] (~matsl@1-1-4-2a.mal.sth.bostream.se) 17.38.48 Part bytemission 17.47.12 Quit Patr3ck_ () 17.52.49 Quit Sucka ("a bird in the bush is worth two in your house") 17.59.19 Join Sucka [0] (~NNSCRIPT@host81-156-214-58.range81-156.btcentralplus.com) 18.03.48 Join mecraw [0] (fwuser@69.2.235.2) 18.22.02 Join XShocK [0] (~cddef002@labb.contactor.se) 18.22.41 Quit DangerousDan ("Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org") 18.29.11 Quit XShocK ("CGI:IRC (EOF)") 18.29.12 Join Stryke` [0] (~Chairman8@resnet-241-86.resnet.umbc.edu) 18.32.47 Join _Lucretia_ [0] (~munkee@abyss2.demon.co.uk) 18.40.27 Quit Ka (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 18.40.48 Join Ka [0] (~tkirk@pcp0010733332pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 18.45.44 Quit rasher ("CGI:IRC") 18.50.53 Quit matsl (Remote closed the connection) 18.52.34 Quit Ka (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)) 19.05.48 # frlm 19.30.31 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 19.35.14 Join Tang [0] (~chatzilla@ARennes-252-1-55-56.w83-195.abo.wanadoo.fr) 19.35.20 # Hello 19.40.29 # (ll come back bye) 19.42.15 Quit bobTHC ("Smoke Weed Every Day !") 19.49.07 Quit einhirn ("Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org") 19.54.17 Join courtc [0] (~court@adsl-158-38-35.asm.bellsouth.net) 19.58.19 # Bagder: r u there? 20.27.13 Join T0mas_ [0] (~Tomas@ip503c08d1.speed.planet.nl) 20.33.09 # hi Tomas 20.33.11 # :) 20.34.17 Join mirak [0] (~mirak@AAubervilliers-152-1-36-4.w83-114.abo.wanadoo.fr) 20.34.19 # hi 20.35.11 # do you know if rockbox could be able to get more output volume from the line out or headphones output ? 20.35.39 # ro maybe it could be possible to hack the iriver firmware 20.35.40 # ? 20.35.49 Quit t0mas (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) 20.38.42 # Hi mirak 20.39.02 # i guess there is sometimes software volume level limitation 20.39.12 # (specially to agree European law) 20.39.27 # but the output level is also linked with hardware 20.40.22 # So i doubt they will have a big possibility to increase the output level 20.40.36 # especialy with actual US fw 20.41.04 # anyway there is still no AudioAPI so stay tuned 20.41.05 # ;) 20.42.30 # true 20.42.33 # hum 20.42.36 # but 20.42.46 # when I record something on line in 20.43.11 # if the volume is high, then I can get a sound much higher than I could get from a mp3 20.43.27 # this leave me thinking that this can produce louder sound 20.43.34 # without distortion 20.43.50 # I agree that with the provided headphones 20.43.56 # louder is useless 20.44.03 # but certainly not for line out 20.44.14 # or other headphones 20.44.29 # but I don't know why I tell that, since you already read it on the forum 20.44.45 # :D 20.46.27 Join XShocK [0] (~XShocK@pcp09492659pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net) 20.46.44 Quit Tang ("Chatzilla 0.9.66 [Mozilla rv:1.7.5/20041108]") 20.47.15 Quit StrathAFK ("Client closed") 21.04.11 Quit Schnueff ("leaving") 21.22.25 Join Strath [0] (~mike@dgvlwinas01pool0-a202.wi.tds.net) 21.24.15 Join preglow [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 21.30.35 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 21.31.38 Join tvelocity [0] (~tony@ipa98.6.tellas.gr) 21.41.11 Join mecraw_ [0] (fwuser@69.2.235.2) 21.41.15 Quit mecraw (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)) 21.56.06 Quit preglow ("ff") 22.03.04 Join amiconn_ [0] (~jens@pD9E7F857.dip.t-dialin.net) 22.07.23 Join keith [0] (~keith@cpe-066-057-071-078.nc.res.rr.com) 22.07.27 Join preglow [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 22.07.58 Quit amiconn (Nick collision from services.) 22.07.59 Nick amiconn_ is now known as amiconn (~jens@pD9E7F857.dip.t-dialin.net) 22.08.48 Quit lolo-laptop ("Client exiting") 22.16.21 Quit preglow ("leaving") 22.16.39 Join preglow [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 22.18.41 Quit keith ("leaving") 22.20.43 Join Ka [0] (~tkirk@pcp0010733332pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) 22.23.09 # still no h140, amiconn? :] 22.23.20 # No :( 22.24.16 # what is Pseudo SRAM? :) 22.24.33 # hi, i thought nobody was here. :) 22.24.39 # pseudo sram? 22.25.07 # yes 22.25.14 # ahhh 22.25.16 # like that 22.25.25 # it's sdram with no visible refresh circuitry, i think 22.25.40 # preglow: yup. http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/tos/tos164.html 22.25.57 # i rock 22.26.13 # i remember we had a look at a ton of ram types in some digital electronics class 22.26.45 # thanks. :) 22.29.10 # Grrrrrrr!!!! 22.29.33 # I *love* it when patches break good old functionality 22.29.33 # tony the tiger suddenly appears 22.32.29 # on a hand-made circuit what are real maximum possible frequencies i can use and do not worry about noise and other things? 22.32.54 # i understand it greatly depends on how that circuit is done, but... 22.32.56 Quit tvelocity (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)) 22.33.06 # a load of factors 22.33.14 # depends on the traces, the components you use, etc 22.33.24 # yes.. i understand. 22.33.51 # it's a pretty complicated subject, you need a lot of experience to make circuit boards that are tolerant to stuff like that 22.33.56 # what frequency range were you thinking of? 22.34.26 # 40-60-80.. somewhere there 22.34.35 # better closer to 80. 22.35.09 # but i have no idea if i even have a chance to achieve it 22.35.55 # what, 80mhz? 22.35.55 # will use smd components 22.36.01 # yes. :) 22.36.10 # what're you making? 22.36.44 # digital oscillograph 22.36.55 # oops.. oscilloscope i think is a right term 22.37.00 # ouch... 22.37.07 # that's probably quite a lot of work, you know 22.37.37 # i am not making it today... just researching. 22.38.16 # but 80mhz is the bandwidth you want? 22.38.29 # if so, the internal logic will have to run at a higher frequency than 80mhz for sure 22.38.39 # with my today's knowledge my maximum is some not connections, lpt port and coms and PICs 22.39.00 # yes. 80mhz for ADC. 22.39.30 # so that reasonably 10-20 mhz signals could be measured 22.39.34 # heh 22.39.40 # i would just have bought a digital scope :P 22.39.51 # making a scope sounds like a ton of work 22.40.15 # :) 22.41.58 # i'm not that good with complicated electronics myself, so i may be exagerating 22.42.12 Join tvelocity [0] (~tony@ipa98.6.tellas.gr) 22.45.42 # but with home equipment, and home made two side textolite(how is it spelled?) and best traces possible with home equipment, what are normal frequencies? 22.46.31 # textolite? 22.46.35 # and no, i have absolutely no idea 22.46.59 # you can probably get very high, your skills with the board layout is a much greater factor than what facilities you have 22.47.04 # to a certain extent, of course 22.47.06 # that material the dielectric sheet is made of. :) 22.47.28 # at higher frequencies, stuff like trace length start to matter 22.49.05 # ok. at least i can hope. :) 22.49.15 # thank you 22.52.12 Join lostlogic [0] (~lostlogic@node-4024215a.mdw.onnet.us.uu.net) 22.53.27 # i think it is spelled "textolite" 22.56.42 Quit tvelocity (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 22.57.47 Quit Stryke` ("Friends don't let friends listen to Anti-Flag") 22.58.23 # do you think we could get more output volume with rock box on the H300 ? 22.58.59 # wouldn't surprise me 22.59.12 # * amiconn spots Bagder 22.59.22 # uh-oh 22.59.24 # :-) 22.59.34 # I wanted to ask you something... meanwhile simply did it :) 22.59.49 # I hope using C99 syntax is ok... 23.00.16 # ...namely 'designated initializers' 23.00.31 # those are one of the best C99 features imo 23.00.54 # I used them for const-policing triggered recording 23.01.03 # mirak: you can't get more output volume than the hardware supports 23.01.22 # mirak: that is, you can, but then you'd have to do nasty stuff like hard limiting 23.01.39 # preglow: Rockbox on Archos is a lot louder than the original firmware 23.01.44 # Bagder: how come? 23.01.56 # probably because they limit it 23.02.25 Quit Rick (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 23.02.27 # and thus its not impossible that iriver does the same 23.02.54 # but I guess the guys who've played with the sound so far could tell for sure 23.03.55 # (1) I wonder why they would artificially limit the volume (2) Anyway, I don't care much either. Even stock archos firmware is louder than I need 23.04.06 # apart from eu regulations, i can't imagine why 23.04.11 Join Rick [0] (rick@wbar25.lax1-4.28.143.213.lax1.dsl-verizon.net) 23.04.32 # i never really compared the power, but it seems iriver uses most of its powers in original. 23.04.38 # the output volume is just fine on the h1x0, as long as the music has decent levels 23.04.58 # I find the h1x0 volume output a lot lower than my Archos 23.05.02 # i guess i could make a auto-gainer once the audio system is in place 23.05.08 # my archos can blow my ears out 23.05.13 # my iriver can't 23.05.22 # then you don't listen to the right music :) 23.05.31 # Heh 23.05.38 # Hocico 23.05.39 # i have successfully made my ears ring for hours on end 23.05.41 # Bagder: Is it really that much qieter? 23.05.56 # amiconn: the iriver/archos difference is indeed noticable 23.06.04 # I've run my iriver on max serveral times 23.06.13 # never been close to that on archos 23.06.18 # With rockbox on archos recorder, I use volume = 50..70 for earphones 23.06.43 # I'm usually on 80 on archos 23.07.01 # but yes 23.07.05 # h1x0 has decent output 23.07.19 # it's not ultra high, but that's just fine by me, my ears are more than damaged enough as it is 23.07.29 # Player is even lower, because of the different scale 23.07.34 # preglow: of course there migh be hardware limitations, however I feel that the software put little output gain on the sound decoding 23.07.55 # for exemple when you record with line in 23.08.02 # i nevger even put it into max.. 20 is extra loud for me in iriver. :) 23.08.06 # you can obtain a louder volume 23.08.11 # really louder 23.08.16 # without distortion 23.08.59 # however most of the time on amplificators, you can hear distortion when you push the volume to the limits 23.09.07 # this really is not the case on the H300 23.10.34 # that's because it doesn't do software amplification 23.10.45 # ahh 23.10.55 # you means speakers/headphones distorting? 23.11.12 # no, it most certainly isn't that loud 23.11.33 # but yes, we can make the output louder by digital means some day 23.11.38 # but there is a limit 23.11.50 # hmz... 23.11.55 # some time ago... 23.12.04 # I was thinking about a audio compressor 23.12.09 # maybe that's what mirak want's? 23.12.16 Nick T0mas_ is now known as t0mas (~Tomas@ip503c08d1.speed.planet.nl) 23.13.04 Join Nibbler [0] (~sven@port-212-202-73-247.dynamic.qsc.de) 23.16.08 Join prethom [0] (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 23.16.08 Quit preglow (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 23.16.14 # ... 23.16.19 Nick prethom is now known as preglow (thomj@s183a.studby.ntnu.no) 23.16.36 # wb 23.16.37 # no, a compressor is not what he wants 23.16.50 # he wants a hard limiter, or a realtime normalizer 23.16.54 # eh... 23.16.59 # a compressor is about that... 23.17.12 # no, not really, heh 23.17.26 # a compressor changes transients as well 23.17.41 # but of course, you can set it to do something like it 23.17.45 # yeah, but it has the same effect as a hard limiter... only sounding better 23.17.53 # t0mas: why a compressor ? 23.17.59 # I want a loudnessor :D 23.18.12 # yeah, but with a compressor you can put the gain higher 23.18.18 # and have a louder sound experience... 23.18.24 # without clipping 23.18.34 # well I use that (not) to play bass 23.18.40 # on bass it reduce the attak 23.18.50 # you can do some fun things with that 23.18.52 # yeah, I have it on my guitar amp... 23.19.19 # well any way I don't think that even talking about software gain is valid 23.19.34 # because in fact nothing links the sound data to the device 23.19.51 # expt maybe the bits to represant amplitude 23.20.05 # ? 23.20.11 # but you can rescalle the sound range easily 23.20.45 # on a 16bits coded sound it means that 16bits are used to code the sound volume 23.20.49 # hm... check the demo of this player: http://otsdj.com/ 23.20.57 # wich mean you can choose between 65536 values 23.21.06 # it has a really good software audio compressor 23.21.25 # you can hear the effect I mean... just use the presets for lounge and radio... 23.21.26 # I will not recompress all my mp3 23.21.33 # no, it's totally different 23.21.35 # I see what you mean 23.21.48 # it's not file compression... it's audio compression... 23.21.57 # a compressor cuts down the audio pikes 23.22.00 # yea 23.22.18 # so you can put the gain higher... and still have no clipping 23.22.21 # if I want to change the gain of the mp3 I need to decompress 23.22.27 # or can I 23.22.30 # I don't know 23.22.35 # well 23.22.42 # well... the compressor should do that while playing 23.22.43 # i think a plain look ahead hard limiter will do the job better 23.23.10 # I might as well use an external amplificator 23.23.11 # preglow: a hard limiter just cut's off the peak right? 23.23.23 # t0mas: yes 23.23.38 # hm... sound's easyer to code... 23.23.42 # in fact you do what you want 23.23.52 # it just plain gains, but it looks ahead, and turns down the gain when things will clip 23.23.54 # maybe the iriver firmware could be hacked 23.23.57 # nope... a compressor starts at say 20 db under the top 23.24.15 # and "compresses" the peaks 23.24.22 # so not just reduce the clipping parts 23.24.32 # but I guess it's a little hard to code that.. 23.24.40 # not really 23.24.40 # I mean you can set the delay of the compressor 23.25.13 # well anyway I don't see the interest of a compressor 23.25.17 # hm.. I use a compressor + limiter :) 23.25.23 # since it will alter the original sound 23.25.31 # guitar is evil 23.25.36 # :) 23.25.45 # ghehe 23.25.46 # if you want more juice and the hardware can't offer more, you don't have a choice, you have to alter the original sound 23.26.12 # well... for just playing as lous as possible a limiter is ok... 23.26.13 # the only other alternative is a normalizer or something, but that won't pump up the volume as much 23.26.31 # that's not a normaliser 23.26.53 # what's not a normalizer? 23.26.54 # a normaliser push the sound with little volume and cut's down the higher 23.27.02 # it put's the sound between a range in fact 23.27.05 # eh mirak 23.27.08 # that's a compressor 23.27.15 # haha 23.27.15 # no 23.27.17 # a normalizer just fits the audio to the max level 23.27.21 # normalizer just makes the average volume the same for all songs 23.27.22 # plain and simple 23.27.27 # a compressor doesn't augment the low volume 23.27.33 # it does mirak 23.28.02 # take you bass... play a soft note... and listen... then hit it hard... it will output at volumes closer together than without the compressor 23.28.16 # I don't have a compressor 23.28.20 # on my amp 23.28.20 Quit vol ("leaving") 23.28.27 # I don't have a amp here by the way 23.28.33 # just a bass ^^ 23.28.36 # lol 23.28.40 # but I used a compressor already 23.29.00 # anyway I don't want to normalise or compress 23.29.05 # I just want more gain 23.29.09 # but yes, if i have it my way, rockbox will evolve into dsp effect heaven, so you'll get your effects 23.29.12 # heh 23.29.13 # hm.. for just maximum ear blast a limiter is ok 23.29.14 # even if it's software 23.29.15 # I don't care 23.29.40 # I don't know why iriver choosed to have such a weak output 23.29.51 # preglow: dsp as in winamp plugin dsp? :D 23.29.59 # t0mas: well, yes, kind of 23.30.08 # t0mas: just that we're a bit more constrained on the cpu power 23.30.20 # should still be more than enough for eqs, filters, reverbs, etc 23.30.30 # just not very many at once, heh 23.30.39 *** Saving seen data "./dancer.seen" 23.30.40 # hm... sounds good 23.30.57 # http://homepage.ntlworld.com/cyborgsystems/CS_Main/RockBox/RockBox.htm 23.31.09 # there is a nice audio control thing 23.32.00 # t0mas: you see, in winamp, you can increase the gain 23.32.00 # I want 25 fps video 23.32.01 # ;) 23.32.17 # lol 23.32.28 # I want more vacation's.... :P 23.33.01 Join Camilo [0] (~chatzilla@userca029.dsl.pipex.com) 23.33.05 # i want just vacation 23.33.13 # straight, good, paid vacation, 24/7 23.33.20 # ghehe 23.33.24 # I have tried Archos headphones on the iriver 23.33.29 # there is almost no sound 23.33.32 # commoing out 23.33.34 # :-/ 23.33.41 # mirak... you play on stage to much? 23.33.56 # having a lot of ear damage? 23.34.48 # I never use the highest volumesettings of my iriver.... 23.35.01 # me either 23.35.13 # with the head phones bought with it 23.35.15 # then why are you complaining about the volume? :P 23.35.30 # howver with other headphnoes I have I must increase the volume by 10 23.35.41 # because I don't like this headphones 23.35.41 # ahh 23.35.47 # i never use those earplugs 23.35.52 # they don't fit in my hears and doesn't give good basses 23.35.54 # i never use earplugs, at that 23.36.01 # I normally use sony plugs 23.36.11 # i require great big large earphones 23.36.21 # I want to buy others, but I am not sure iriver will have enough power 23.36.30 # hm.. but I have the US firmware... 23.36.38 # preglow: I don't see how you can have sound ith such big ones 23.36.44 # I have korean 23.36.45 # how? 23.36.55 # hm... only EU is limited afaik 23.36.55 # i have much sound 23.36.55 # I might try US one once 23.36.59 # yep 23.37.02 # I tried it 23.37.06 # it's not that much lower 23.37.09 # but it is 23.37.11 # never tried... 23.37.21 # boucht it... and upgraded to a US version 23.37.29 # I suspect iriver to have put a limitation on the other firmwares als 23.37.31 # also 23.37.37 # ghehe 23.37.41 # I guess they don't want to destroy our hears 23.37.42 # ears 23.37.43 # maybe it's a conspiracy? :P 23.38.08 # however there is some stupid guys that put the music so loud you can hear what they hear 23.38.16 # that's their problem 23.38.39 # I am focusing on this to much 23.38.48 # * t0mas looks up... what? never did that... 23.38.52 # this bother me more than the 10fps thing on video 23.38.54 # lol 23.39.14 # preglow: what is your player ? 23.39.16 # h120 23.39.32 # I suspect the H100 to have more output volume thne 23.39.33 # then 23.39.33 # * t0mas has a h120 too 23.39.51 # it's supposed to be the same chips 23.39.55 # isn't it ? 23.40.05 # ok by 23.40.08 # I go to bed 23.40.10 # bye 23.40.11 # good night 23.40.45 # I can put the sound to the max without feeling pain 23.40.50 # that's not normal ^^ 23.41.06 # ;) 23.41.23 # hmm 23.41.30 # * HCl looks at that cyborgsystems site 23.41.38 # maybe we should import some of those things into cvs? 23.41.53 # hehe 23.42.11 # try googling for bluechip and rockbox and gpl 23.42.15 # read and weap 23.43.23 # then of course, I am the devil 23.44.33 # i don't quite follow 23.44.37 # his code is public domain? 23.44.47 # its not very clear 23.44.48 # can't we still adopt it and just release it under the gpl then? 23.44.57 # and he can just not release his sources next time 23.44.59 # I'd rather not 23.45.00 # Haha. But: can you ever be sure that all of the developers that gave their realname (except Linus and Zagor) really gave their true name? 23.45.00 # if he doesn't want it gpled 23.45.20 # amiconn: of course not 23.46.30 # * t0mas searches his GPG signature :) 23.47.59 # * t0mas is going to bed... 23.48.03 # good night 23.48.05 # I'm not sure what the hangup about GPL is 23.48.13 Nick t0mas is now known as t0mas|zzz (~Tomas@ip503c08d1.speed.planet.nl) 23.48.29 Join matsl [0] (~matsl@1-1-4-2a.mal.sth.bostream.se) 23.48.45 # me neither, it seems to me as pd seems rather compatible 23.48.59 # any code he releases under PD can be put under any license by anyone 23.49.06 # eh... 23.49.12 # don't think so... 23.49.22 # let me get the link again >.<; 23.49.30 # * HCl just closed his browser window 23.49.31 # he is the author... and only the author can put the code under a license... 23.49.48 # well, thats the whole thing. pd isn't licensed 23.49.51 # he's actually giving the code to everyone 23.49.52 # except when you put something in the public domain - you are giving everyone that privilege 23.49.54 # saying do whatever you want. 23.49.57 # yep 23.50.01 # yes, thats pd. 23.50.02 # but... on the other hand... microsoft licensed some bsd pd code... 23.50.07 # for win9x networking 23.50.18 # and possibly distancing yourself from legal implications of releasing the code 23.50.34 # hm... maybe just email him? 23.50.36 # so i say pd is rather compatible, only we take all responsibility for code from that point 23.50.48 # and ask him if it's ok to import his code? 23.51.12 # sounds okish to me. 23.51.38 # need to check who communicated with him earlier 23.51.38 # well... email him? 23.51.44 # yeah 23.51.47 # check the mailinglist 23.51.54 # HCl: there's been a loooong series on the list 23.51.59 # found something about him when googleing 23.52.18 # Bagder: yea, i read a big part of it 23.52.32 # Bagder: as far as i understand it, pd means anyone can license it under anything 23.52.37 # so i don't see why it would be a problem 23.53.01 # I actually haven't kept up with his latest moves 23.53.10 # I'm just SO tired on him and his stuff 23.53.38 # would you mind if i talked to him and get a clear to import his stuff? 23.54.06 # feel free, I won't block others or the project 23.54.12 # k 23.54.28 # Bagder? what's the problem with him? 23.54.31 # just being annoying? 23.55.01 # basically 23.55.18 # i'll just write him a friendly email.. 23.55.18 # PD is just so 1980s 23.55.29 # i guess. 23.55.30 # Most of his code is somewhat outdated anyway, and needs adaption (e.g. the USB handling stuff). 23.55.34 # its actually not sure you CAN release anything as PD 23.55.39 # i see the good bits of both pd and gpl 23.55.43 # ghehe 23.55.46 # either way. 23.55.46 # I see my clock... 23.55.48 # the main point is. 23.55.49 Join MoosCamaro [0] (MoosCamaro@m214.net81-66-158.noos.fr) 23.55.51 # and I was going to bed... 23.55.54 # if the original author doesn't have a problem with it. 23.55.55 # I remember now ;) 23.55.58 # hi all 23.55.59 # we're not gonna have any trouble. 23.56.05 # good night 23.56.08 # c ya tomorrow 23.56.11 # i experienced that before where like, a person was violating the gpl of dosbox 23.56.19 # and the authors of dosbox refused to do anything about it. 23.56.31 # and then nothing can happen 23.56.43 # as amiconn says, his code is very outdated now too 23.56.49 # i guess public domain is something that is not licensed by anyone, and anyone can use it. 23.57.01 # i know, but his games, and audio plugins seem at least somewhat interesting enough 23.57.09 # XShocK: not strictly, but that's how people generally see it 23.57.49 # I'll shutup and code instead 23.58.22 # this is actually quite recent? 2005-01-12 23.58.26 # The only really interesting part (imho) is the Othelo game. Audio3587 functionality is part of cvs rockbox for some time (without the graphical candy), and a solitaire game does also already exist 23.58.42 # yea, i'm mostly interested in the graphical candy >.o 23.58.52 # i'm not saying i will import his source 23.58.59 # i mostly want a clear in that its possible to use his source