Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Nuke & RemoClone
Re: Nuke & RemoClone
From: gizz <gizz_at_online.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:12:02 +0100
Hey !! NudeBox is not bad !! :) Ok, it doesn't go really in the same
What do you think about : DudeBox ????
It rocks, nope ??
RockBox is a good choice, too..
Keeping *Box at the end is a good idea, I think, because we start of the
existing (the archos jukebox with shipped f/w)
and try to create something new (=add value; keep the hardware, and enhance
BTW, does T.J has some infos about his RemoClone project ?? What I wonder is
about the interface (electric values, etc..) because I didn't break my
warranty, and I can't measure anything...
If the signals are simple TTL link, it would be easy to connect some LPT
port to the *Box :)
-- Gizz. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Pertermann" <perterm_at_vce.de> To: <jukebox_at_cool.haxx.se> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:03 PM Subject: Re: Nuke & RemoClone > gizz wrote: > > I see. So what about DukeBox ?? > > A bit less fun... or JokeBox (this sucks a bit nope ? :) > > Well, if you want to draw attention to the project you might want to > consider the name 'NudeBox' ... > > Phil > > -- > http://www.x-phobie.de > mailto:phil_at_x-phobie.de > AOL Instant Messenger: langhaarRocker > ICQ: 113881639 >Received on 2002-01-11