Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: nsauzede: "AJB HD crashes : possible solution"
• Previous message: Rob & Liz Ward: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• In reply to: Philipp Pertermann: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• Next in thread: Rob & Liz Ward: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey !! NudeBox is not bad !! :) Ok, it doesn't go really in the same
direction, but...

What do you think about : DudeBox ????
It rocks, nope ??

RockBox is a good choice, too..

Keeping *Box at the end is a good idea, I think, because we start of the
existing (the archos jukebox with shipped f/w)
and try to create something new (=add value; keep the hardware, and enhance
the sofwtare)

BTW, does T.J has some infos about his RemoClone project ?? What I wonder is
about the interface (electric values, etc..) because I didn't break my
warranty, and I can't measure anything...
If the signals are simple TTL link, it would be easy to connect some LPT
port to the *Box :)

--
Gizz.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philipp Pertermann" <perterm_at_vce.de>
To: <jukebox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Nuke & RemoClone
> gizz wrote:
> > I see. So what about DukeBox ??
> > A bit less fun... or JokeBox (this sucks a bit nope ? :)
>
> Well, if you want to draw attention to the project you might want to
> consider the name 'NudeBox' ...
>
> Phil
>
> --
> http://www.x-phobie.de
> mailto:phil_at_x-phobie.de
> AOL Instant Messenger: langhaarRocker
> ICQ: 113881639
>

• Next message: nsauzede: "AJB HD crashes : possible solution"
• Previous message: Rob & Liz Ward: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• In reply to: Philipp Pertermann: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• Next in thread: Rob & Liz Ward: "Re: Nuke & RemoClone"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]