Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: functions?
From: Chris Houghten <chris_at_houghten.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0400
I agree while everything is still fluid, but eventually it would be nice to
have a printer friendly manual format, because I know I dont have internet
access in my car or at the beach or at my sisters graduation party.Anyway...
long way off, se no discussion warrented yet.
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Styles" <george_at_ripnet.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: functions?
> Yeah, PDS has its uses, put in general its a PITA - IMHO html is much
> for this kind of thing
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M. OReilly" <moreilly_at_moreilly.com>
> To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM
> Subject: RE: functions?
> > Any chance we can skip the pdf format? I have moral trouble supporting
> > anything Adobe does right now... I think txt and html format are just
> > for what we need.
> > Sorry to be a stickler.
> > Matt
> > >>
> > I have been wanting to contribute to thos project since the beginnig,
> > have not been able to get a linux box put together yet and have not been
> > able to successfully get gcc compiling the project on win2k, so if
> > documentation is open, I can definitely do text and html and pdf on
> > hehe.
> > So, yes, I do believe I am up to starting on this.
> > <<
Received on 2002-06-24