From: Magnus Holmgren <lear_at_algonet.se>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:09:46 +0200 (CEST)

Den 20 Aug 2002 skrev Nielsen Linus (ext):

> It swapped from start+2 thru start+len*2 inclusive, when it should swap from
> start thru start+len*2-2.

True. That would account for the glitches I heard.

> I took the liberty of correcting your (really good) code and made the loop
> go forward in memory. And i also committed it to the CVS.

Thanks. But you could have omitted the comment "(direction IS important)", because that isn't true... :)

> And guess what? It seems to be even FASTER than the 16-bit version! :-)

Nice.

  Magnus
Received on 2002-08-21