Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Sorry for mail loop - not my fault (was: custom wps behaviour )
RE: Sorry for mail loop - not my fault (was: custom wps behaviour )
From: Stuart Tedford <stuart.tedford_at_piresearch.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:57:09 +0100
Be careful writing 'X' 'X' 'X' like that, thats probably more likely to be
rejected/censored than the f word :) (I can't beleive someone scans for the
word fu-ny, some people have too much time on their hands, I wonder if they
also scan for the word "fun" too).
Uwe, I have noticed that the addressing in mails to the list from you are
different than the others. I have a rule set up in outlook to put all
rockbox mails into a separate folder, but your posts don't have "rockbox" in
the to/from field so they often go to my inbox which is a pain.
If you just post the mails to rockbox, then people will get them from
rockbox, and hence will reply to rockbox. That's the way the lists are
supposed to work isn't it?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Freese [mailto:mail_at_uwe-freese.de]
> Sent: 04 September 2002 11:34
> To: Uwe Freese
> Subject: Sorry for mail loop - not my fault (was: XXX custom wps
> Uwe Freese wrote on Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 12:06:44 PM:
> I wrote a mail with subject "xxx custom wps behaviour"
> and set the
> reply-to address in my mail to
> Uwe Freese <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
> which is correct for a mailinglist, I think (so a
> responder creates a
> mail that a mail program shows that it's addressed to me,
> also if the
> whole mailinglist users can read it).
> And a badly configured mail server at naturesbest.net meant
> that this is
> a junk mail and created a loop that all of you have seen, I think.
> Sorry that this happened, even if I don't think that this was
> my fault.
> Bye, Uwe.
Received on 2002-09-04