From: Benoit Lubek <BLubek_at_icominfo.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:09:41 +0200

If it can't be a setting, could this be a compile-time option ?

BoD

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Robert Hak [mailto:rhak_at_ramapo.edu]
> Envoyé : lundi 9 septembre 2002 22:55
> À : 'rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se'
> Objet : RE: [PATCH] :Browser : cosmetic improvement
>
>
>
>
> While I'm all for more options, I think this would be a case
> of overkill.
>
> For those that don't like it, I think this would have to be
> one of those
> 'quarks' that they would just have to accept.
>
> /Adi
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Benoit Lubek wrote:
>
> > I don't like it. [...]
>
> I think this has to be a setting that can be enabled / disabled!
> Some like it, some don't...
>
> BoD
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Björn Stenberg [mailto:bjorn_at_haxx.se]
> > Envoyé : lundi 9 septembre 2002 10:53
> > À : rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
> > Objet : Re: [PATCH] :Browser : cosmetic improvement
> >
> >
> > Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> > > For what I can see, the list will still wrap, but the
> > cursor will not jump
> > > to the top. The list just continues from the beginning
> > without moving the
> > > cursor.
> >
> > I don't like it. It is now much more difficult to see where
> > it wraps. You have to actually read the names and notice the
> > sort order is restarted.
> >
> > --
> > Björn
> >
>
Received on 2002-09-10