Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP
Re: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP
From: Andrew Jamieson <ajamiesn_at_optusnet.com.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:35:39 +1000
Ahhh .. so you're actually talking about _cutting_ the power to the HDD,
with a FET switch or such like, yes? Hmmm ... can't see anything like that
on the schematics (at a cursory examination, looking at Acrobate with my
head on its side :) - a signal on the VBatt line maybe? I'm not as clued up
on the smaller IDE interface as perhaps I could be. But it's not a command
to the HDD that parks the head and cuts the power internally? I thought it
was the latter.
If you can confirm that it is a logic signal that does the power_off, not a
register setting, then I will hunt for such a beast on my player (new).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nielsen Linus (ext)" <Linus.Nielsen_at_elema.siemens.se>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: ATA - USE_POWEROFF vs USE_SLEEP
> > In the code in ata.c it says poweroff only works on the
> > recorder, not the player. Can anyone confirm this and say why?
> At least the older players have no way of controlling the HD power. I
> know about the newer ones, they don't use the same port pin at least.
> > Anyway, I think Linus has done these measurements already -
> > using the _bad_ poweroff that is undefined in the
> > code already :)
> Bad, bad me. Yeah I know that the current POWEROFF feature is bad, that is
> why we don't use it. :-)
> I don't remember the current draw of the various configurations...just
> poweroff was a lot better...
Received on 2002-09-10