From: Leif Sawyer <lsawyer_at_gci.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:28:02 -0800

Chris Pimlott responds to
> Ed Wilson who wrote:
> > i'd rather have it loading fast :)
>
> Storing an additional 2 bytes/song would not make a noticiable difference.

Well, maybe not for your small playlists, but I've got
playlists that run in the thousands of entries. (My ALL_FILES is 9634 songs)

Thats a significant amount of memory overhead for something that probably
wouldn't get used very often.


I'd rather have the randomizer fixed for large playlists -- where only the
first few hundred of the playlist are actually played.
Received on 2002-09-13