|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: DRAM 2MB -> DRAM 8MBRe: DRAM 2MB -> DRAM 8MB
From: Vladimir Pantelic <pan_at_nt.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:56:59 +0200 Warp Dag wrote: > Actually I don't agree at all!!! > > Just think 5 minutes ;) Actually I thought more than that :-) > Filling a 2MB or a 8MB buffer while the hard > drive is spinning takes about the same time!!! I mean, for a song, > ... Point for you. > Finally, about your average power consuption calculation is flawed. Here > is the correct formula (I assume the drives will never take more than 4s > to fill the 8MB buffer): > 2 MB : 50mA + 300mA * 2/100 + 500 * 3/100 = 50mA + 21mA = 71mA average > 8 MB : 50mA + 300mA * 4/450 + 500 * 3/450 = 50mA + 6mA = 56mA average OK, so it's 56 and not 59. As I said my numbers were "rough". I just wanted to point out that N x larger buffer does not mean N x longer playing time and that the key to power saving is to reduce the current used when the drive is not spinning. An Archos JBR runs about 12hours with 1800mAh batteries, so we could assume that it takes an average of 1800 / 12 = 150mA. With the drive currents as given above and some allowance for not draining the batteries completely we should have a constant current of about 100mA at least, so the reduction through 8MB of buffer might be even less as above: 2MB: 100mA + 21mA = 121mA 8MB: 100mA + 6mA = 106mA --> 14% less ! > But you know, you should not think in "average". Because the idea is > that it will reduce the spinning stuff, and you must know that each time > you take a heavy load on the cells you loose a lot of energy, more than OK on this one too. I'm sure we'll soon know how much longer the 8MB unit will run. It will be interesting to see whether the theory will match real life. Regards, Vladimir Received on 2002-09-17 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |