|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re[6]: Microphone.Re[6]: Microphone.
From: Uwe Freese <mail_at_uwe-freese.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:24:50 +0200 Hello Matthew, Matthew P. OReilly wrote on Saturday, October 19, 2002, 2:54:24 PM: MPO> *Supposedly*, the A96F is supposed to boost the signal level by up to 25dB. MPO> I'm not sure what it does for impedence. Aren't these the two areas we're MPO> trying to improve? If we want an electret condenser mic, we want to provide the (>1,5V) power (if the mic is without a battery inside). For a professional condenser mic (no "electret"), we need the 48V phantom power. In both cases the amplification. I personally don't want a dynamic mic, because I think they don't sound so nice. MPO> Admittedly, I don't know how it would boost the signal without a power MPO> source of some kind, like a battery. That's the point. It is not possible that this Shure converters do what we want. We need a "battery powerer amplifier box". MPO> Does the Shure A95UF MPO> (http://www.shure.com/accessories/a95uf.asp?PN=Problem%20Solvers) seem any MPO> more likely to work, or are we really barking up the wrong tree here? As above, I don't think this is what we need. I soldered this one: http://www.geocities.com/ferocious_1999/md/micpreamp2.html But as descibed in another mail, I have tested it only with cheap mic capsules and that doesn't sound good enough to me.. Bye, Uwe. Received on 2002-10-19 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |