dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Hungarian Notation (was: [patch] peakmeter)

Hungarian Notation (was: [patch] peakmeter)

From: Björn Stenberg <>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:50:52 +0100

Andreas Zwirtes wrote:
> > Question: I think it is very usefull to give the variables type
> > information like iStatus (that now would be istatus). i stands for
> > integer, l for long and so on. Is there also a silent convention on that?

Yeah, the convention is: Don't. As Linus Torvalds so eloquently puts it:

  Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian
  notation) is brain damaged - the compiler knows the types anyway and can
  check those, and it only confuses the programmer. No wonder MicroSoft
  makes buggy programs.

Jakob Heinemann wrote:
> sure there are standards for variable naming; one way is called Hungarian
> Notation. apparaently invented by Microsoft looong ago.

Wow, that's an excellent page to illustrate the horrors of hungarian notation. Just look at their magnificently unreadable code example:

nI pbDont pszLike fpHungarian paiNotation.

Received on 2002-11-07

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy