Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Recording woes (in detail)
Re: Recording woes (in detail)
From: Christophe Avoinne <christophe.avoinne_at_laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:58:52 +0100
Just a suggestion :
Does the FAT32 code in rockbox update the FAT entries in each FAT in a FAT32
partition ? Windows may be very sensitive about the integrity of FATs. If
the FAT32 partition has the FAT mirroring flag on, you must update as many
FAT entries as there are FATs in a FAT32 partition when creating/truncating
a file. Or do you force the FAT mirroring flag to be off (surely the best
solution for embedded application since you would only need to update the
current FAT instead of all) ?
My 2 cents worth.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul van der Heu" <pvdh_at_xs4all.nl>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: Recording woes (in detail)
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:57:46 -0800, Greg Haerr wrote:
> >>*PANIC* Updating reserved FAT entry 0
> >I'm sure everybody realizes this, but just in case, let's repeat:
> >you've got to run scandisk after any filesystem error.
> But we are not talking about a filesystem error here.. This error
> creeps up when I delete a file written by rockbox.
Received on 2002-11-14