|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Feature RequestRe: Feature Request
From: Greg Haerr <greg_at_censoft.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:12:08 -0800 > why don't we just partition the disk? lets say 10 MB for the rockbox stuff > so archos firmware can find it and the rest is NTFS. Four reasons this is going the wrong direction: 1. Requiring NTFS would require users to repartition their large drive, likely causing data loss, just to try/run Rockbox. If they switched back, NTFS songs wouldn't be available. 2. NTFS requires more complicated read & write code, using more memory and making the Rockbox image larger. 3. USB/NTFS drivers may not be available for Win98 and other systems wanting to transfer data to the drive. Same for formatting/partitioning utilities. 4. The current implementation of the FAT32 read/write code actually is quite quick, and all FAT sectors are cached, which is the biggest potential issue with FAT filesystem speed. If disk file read/write speed is an issue, which I dont think it is, there's a couple of things that could help: 1. Reformat the HD using a larger cluster size. Increased cluster sizes allow larger contiguous sector reading/writing. 2. The system could use asynchronous ata_sector_read/writes without waiting for completion, (Bjorn/Linus is this possible with the Archos HW?), combined with a slightly modified buffering mechanism. Regards, Greg Received on 2002-11-17 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |