|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Re: More long recording tests feedbackRe: Re: More long recording tests feedback
From: Martin Borus <martin_at_borus.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:07:40 +0100 rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se schrieb am 18.11.02 03:19:03: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:54:08 +0100, Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote: > > >>Hint: If you change the fixed "RECORD.MP3" name in a way it allows > >>to do more than one recording before connecting to a PC, I'll do > >>even more recording tests > > > >Is it ok if they are named REC001.MP3 and so on? > > I would prefer a timestamp as filename (like 14111545.MP3 when > recording starts an 12 november at 15:45 ) Fine with my - anything, as long as the filenames are different. I don't like it that much, though - currently I switch 2 sets of batteries I load in an external charger to make sure they are fully loaded during the tests. Each switch kills my internal time settings... > BTW I did record a 4 hour live set tonight and it came out really > bad.. lots of skipping and distortion.. I'm curious, is this a digital or analog recording.. > The MP3 would not load into > SoundForge and whe converted to wav using Winamp it would not load as > well.. If I could record two or three arts I could test this abit > better/ change bitrate/frequency in between.. > Also I still get 32 KHz recording regardless of the setting Are you recording a digital signal? Because my satellite signal is digital, 48kHz and I only get 48kHz not matter what I choose. ________________________________________________________________ Viren? Wir wissen nicht was Ihr Arzt empfiehlt. Wir empfehlen den Virencheck für Dateianhänge! http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021159 Received on 2002-11-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |