From: Ed Wilson <ed.wilson_at_cedalion.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:52:48 -0000

also

time to first response from developers:

rockbox : 2 hrs max
archos : never

-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Tedford [mailto:stuart.tedford_at_piresearch.co.uk]
Sent: 05 December 2002 13:35
To: 'rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se'
Subject: RE: Firmware Feature Comparison Chart


I'd add something about disk caching and accessing. Rockbox has far fewer
(and shorter) disk accesses for any given playlist - which is better for
disk lifespan and damage limitation.

Oh and "Hight Resolution Volume Control" should it say "Height...."? - and
what is that anyway? :)

Stu.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Stenberg [mailto:daniel_at_haxx.se]
> Sent: 05 December 2002 13:06
> To: Rockbox
> Subject: Firmware Feature Comparison Chart
>
>
> http://rockbox.haxx.se/docs/features.html
>
> I've run some threads in some user forums on the web first,
> and we've added
> quite a number of features to compare the two existing firmware
> implementations for Archos Jukeboxes.
>
> Feel free to mention missing features, point out mistakes or
> just throw out
> your opinions. I'm listening.
>
> The point of this particular page would be to:
>
> a) List features of Rockbox
>
> b) Show people why they might like Rockbox more than the
> original firmware
>
> Lots of people seem to look for both these kinds of information.
>
> --
> Daniel "Bagder" Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/
>
Received on 2002-12-05