Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Trickle ChargingRe: Trickle Charging
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Björn Stenberg <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:52:53 +0100
Justin wrote:
> I suspect there is an additional advantage here to continuous
> low-current trickle charging over a pulse top-up charging
Unfortunately, we don't have the choice between low-current or pulse charge. We can only choose between pulse charging or no trickle charge at all.
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:52:53 +0100
Justin wrote:
> I suspect there is an additional advantage here to continuous
> low-current trickle charging over a pulse top-up charging
Unfortunately, we don't have the choice between low-current or pulse charge. We can only choose between pulse charging or no trickle charge at all.
-- BjörnReceived on 2002-12-10
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy