Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: anti-skip buffer question
Re: anti-skip buffer question
From: Bryce Benton <me_at_brycebenton.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:30:29 -0600
can you (or someone) be more specific?
do i understand correctly: longer buffer time means less battery
consumption because the disk doesn't have to spin up as often?
if that's true, my question remains... in what cases would someone want
less than the maximum buffer time?
> > how does the anti-skip buffer affect performance?
> > or... is there any reason to select less than the longest time for
> > setting?
>Eats more battery, since it reduces the time between disk reads by the
Received on 2003-01-13