Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze
Re: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze
From: Eric Linenberg <elinenbe_at_umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:08:42 -0500
no more bickering kids. we're almost there.
DS> I believe what he was trying to say is that you pissed off Bjorn (judging by
DS> Bjorn's tone in his reply) and we will defend Bjorn because Bjorn is
DS> producing more software than you, is in the development stream of Rockbox,
DS> and if he quits we would be much worse off (plus we just plain like him).
DS> I think tone of voice has a lot to do with how email is taken, and the tone
DS> of your initial comment to Bjorn was not very cheerful. All we're saying
DS> is, "Please use a cheerful tone when talking to developers, for you don't
DS> code and won't fill the gap well if they leave." And it makes it easier to
DS> hear what you are saying.
DS> Just an observation,
DS> -----Original Message-----
DS> From: Holger Lembke [mailto:holger_at_hlembke.de]
DS> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:33 AM
DS> To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
DS> Subject: RE: Rockbox 2.0 Feature Freeze
>> I stand with Bjorn on his. It's not attitude, it's silencing those that
>> just want to bitch.
DS> That is why I love the attitude.
DS> Just assume 'he is bitching. silence him!'. Don't argue, don't hear, just
DS> silence him.
DS> Holger Lembke
Received on 2003-01-28