Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: rockbox_at_diffenbach.org: "Some more questions on writing Rockbox code"
• Previous message: Robert Hak: "RE: Creating playlists internally. Why?"
• In reply to: Robert Hak: "Re: Creating playlists internally. Why?"
• Next in thread: rockbox_at_diffenbach.org: "Some more questions on writing Rockbox code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

So in other words, the ability to quickly create a new, possibly
temporary, playlist (or "queue") of ~playlists~ on the fly, rather than
wiring up the ol' USB cable to create and store endless possible
combinations?

Ok, now that makes sense and I can see where some people may want that.
Thanks. :)

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Robert Hak wrote:

>
> Hmmm.. maybe think of it this way. I know for myself I have my music
> broken into genres. I have external playlists that cover Punk, Rock,
> Punk+Rock, and All (these are the ones I listen to most often).
>
> But what happens if (lets say), I want to do Soundtracks and Rock
> togeather. I don't have a Soundtracks playlist, nor one of
> Rock+Soundtracks. So I can 'build' an 'internal' playlist of my Rock and
> Soundtracks music. Then once everything is queued Im all set.
>
> Does that make a bit more sense?
>
> /Adi
>

 
Thx
M.Hopper

• Next message: rockbox_at_diffenbach.org: "Some more questions on writing Rockbox code"
• Previous message: Robert Hak: "RE: Creating playlists internally. Why?"
• In reply to: Robert Hak: "Re: Creating playlists internally. Why?"
• Next in thread: rockbox_at_diffenbach.org: "Some more questions on writing Rockbox code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]