Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: [off-topic] flaming
Re: [off-topic] flaming
From: BoD <BoD_at_JRAF.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:40:23 +0100
Imho, 648466^51658 is more that the number of particles in the universe.
But I do agree that my first estimation was not reflecting the coolness of
being able to compile it yourself, and the "weight" of the features. Not
mentionning the cool logo ;)
By the way, I'll try to extend the feature comparison chart with data from
the iPod! I think this can be interesting even if it's not really related to
rockbox at all...
Sundar, Shekhar (MSTG-NY) wrote:
> ...to add to my 2cents to this non-productive thread:
> you are assuming equal weight for all the features. I would weigh
> some feature (like fast playlist reading and rolo among many) 10000
> times over some things that the firmware has and rockbox doesn't (not
> many at this point).. so depending on the weight of the features, I
> think that even 648466^51658 is very probable estimation.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Pantelic [mailto:pan_at_nt.tu-darmstadt.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
> Subject: Re: [off-topic] flaming
> BoD wrote:
> > How did you make this estimation? I think a good estimation would
> > be based on the difference of features between the two firmwares.
> > According to http://rockbox.haxx.se/docs/features.html, there is 36
> > "good" features on rockbox and 14 on archos. So I think we can say
> > rockbox is only about 2.57 times better than the original one.
> This list lacks one item:
> Maximum number of files/dirs in one directory: 200(Rockbox) vs
> 999(Archos) so the score is 36/15 :-)
Received on 2003-01-30