Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: another 8MB upgrade success story
RE: another 8MB upgrade success story
From: TP Diffenbach <rockbox_at_diffenbach.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:16:28 -0500
Why do you prefer to have rockbox dynamically recognize your memory size, rather than build for a particular size?
Quoting Leif Sawyer <lsawyer_at_gci.com>:
> I could really use that 8M upgrade, and knowing that the code
> "just knew" how to deal with that would make my life simpler.
> (Of course, i still have to get the upgrade.. :-( )
> It sounds like the first thing is just to outline exactly what
> buffer changes need to take place, reserve a few bytes in memory
> for 'hardcoding' these values, then adjusting them if we find
> more than 2M. ( X << 4 , or whatever the local equivalent is to
> quickly multiply by 4, as that's the difference..)
> Would that be a reasonable approach?
-- Archos FM needs a Rockbox!Received on 2003-03-19