From: TP Diffenbach <rockbox_at_diffenbach.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:16:28 -0500

Why do you prefer to have rockbox dynamically recognize your memory size, rather than build for a particular size?

Quoting Leif Sawyer <lsawyer_at_gci.com>:


> I could really use that 8M upgrade, and knowing that the code
> "just knew" how to deal with that would make my life simpler.
> (Of course, i still have to get the upgrade.. :-( )
>
>
> It sounds like the first thing is just to outline exactly what
> buffer changes need to take place, reserve a few bytes in memory
> for 'hardcoding' these values, then adjusting them if we find
> more than 2M. ( X << 4 , or whatever the local equivalent is to
> quickly multiply by 4, as that's the difference..)
>
> Would that be a reasonable approach?
>
>
>

-- 
Archos FM needs a Rockbox!

Received on 2003-03-19