Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Previous message: TP Diffenbach: "Re: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Maybe in reply to: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Next in thread: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Reply: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Reply: Björn Stenberg: "Re: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

TP Diffenbach writes:
> It's a persuasive FAQ.
>
> But (for example) I'm thinking I have no directories
> approaching 400 files. My biggest directory contains 89, and
> my average directory probably 15.
>

Whereas my archos is packed with 9862 MP3's, and still about 11G
to spare..

I could really use that 8M upgrade, and knowing that the code
"just knew" how to deal with that would make my life simpler.
(Of course, i still have to get the upgrade.. :-( )

It sounds like the first thing is just to outline exactly what
buffer changes need to take place, reserve a few bytes in memory
for 'hardcoding' these values, then adjusting them if we find
more than 2M. ( X << 4 , or whatever the local equivalent is to
quickly multiply by 4, as that's the difference..)

Would that be a reasonable approach?

• application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

• Next message: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Previous message: TP Diffenbach: "Re: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Maybe in reply to: idc-dragon_at_gmx.de: "another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Next in thread: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Reply: TP Diffenbach: "RE: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Reply: Björn Stenberg: "Re: another 8MB upgrade success story"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]