|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Random numbers et alRandom numbers et al
From: Blue Chip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 12:55:54 +0100 Hi, Still umming and arrring about what to buy, atm. the AJBR20 is winning (shame the FM unit has no recmote pin >:( ). Does anyone feel it appropriate to recommend a place to purchase one (JBR20) in the UK? I have read complaints about Archos Customer Service, so I am loathed to deal with them directly :( Anyway... I am currently reviewing the source tree and am considering what part I might play in its future development. A couple of things strike me to be asked. # As people have not adhered to a single source code layout, would it be worth considering the use of a beautifier to standardise everything? # The random number generator appears to be a horribly complex and memory hungry block of code - is there any reason why this monstrous algorithm was chosen over the classic "X <- (aX + c) mod m"? If not, please say and I will forward my random number class (2 minutes to convert back to C again) and documentation (including biblio) to some relevant person. The memory, codespace and execution time could ALL be greatly improved by this change. # Would anybody entertain a rewrite of the core libs (memset/strcpy/etc) in assembler - it appears that this would make a notable difference to the speed of the codebase? Plus ASM is my language of choice. # How simple is it to have the Cygwin dev kit installed alongside the standard PC cygwin install? The "one or the other" limitation could be a problem for me :( Hope there's something helpful in this post. Bc Received on 2003-04-06 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |