Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Version 2.0 releasedRe: Version 2.0 released
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Paul van der Heu <pvdh_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:29:26 +0200
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:48:25 -0500, jim sunday wrote:
>I thought the chip was limited to encoding at 192 kbits/s? Is this
>because it records with variable bits all the time or can you select
It's 160 VBR actually
>now? I would think 320 kbits/s at 48 hHz would be just as good or
>better than my minidisc recordings for live stuff.
160 kbps/VBR on the recorder compares favourably to MD.. I tried..
Received on 2003-04-15
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:29:26 +0200
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:48:25 -0500, jim sunday wrote:
>I thought the chip was limited to encoding at 192 kbits/s? Is this
>because it records with variable bits all the time or can you select
It's 160 VBR actually
>now? I would think 320 kbits/s at 48 hHz would be just as good or
>better than my minidisc recordings for live stuff.
160 kbps/VBR on the recorder compares favourably to MD.. I tried..
Received on 2003-04-15
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy