Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: FAT Filename Mangling bug. (was: RE : Regarding the recent recording PANIC's)Re: FAT Filename Mangling bug. (was: RE : Regarding the recent recording PANIC's)
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Michael O'Quinn <michael_at_oquinn.info>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Björn Stenberg wrote:
>
> My main point for doubting that the shortnames matter, however, is that
> there is no technical need for the shortname to match the longname. They
> are not connected by the name, but by three separate mechanisms each
> being much more secure than filename association:
I agree that it's not the name, I was wrong about that.
Michael
Received on 2003-04-25
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Björn Stenberg wrote:
>
> My main point for doubting that the shortnames matter, however, is that
> there is no technical need for the shortname to match the longname. They
> are not connected by the name, but by three separate mechanisms each
> being much more secure than filename association:
I agree that it's not the name, I was wrong about that.
Michael
Received on 2003-04-25
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy