From: Chris Holt <amiga2k_at_cox.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:30:03 -0400

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:53:57 +0200, BoD wrote:
>Chris Holt wrote: (...)
>>
>>I'm sure there are readers that can handle HTML, btu HTML markup is not
>>allowed per the spec.
>
>But the 2.0 spec says: "An item may also be complete in itself, if so,
>the description contains the text (*entity-encoded HTML is allowed*),
>and the link and title may be omitted." (emphasis mine)
>
>:)
>
>BoD

Okay, so they added this in 2.0. My bust. But the specific document in
question did purport to be 0.91. <shrug>

Dupes are back BTW! This is the second copy I got of this message!

Chris
Received on 2003-04-29