Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Unlocking the full features of the MAS chip (long, sorry)
Re: Unlocking the full features of the MAS chip (long, sorry)
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 03:26:19 +0200
Brent Geery wrote:
> Some (older only?) hardware players have had problems playing MP3s
> with CRCs. Many players (soft and hard) just ignore CRC anyway.
All I have heard is that some encoders generate MP3 files with CRC
enabled, but with the CRC set to 0. That is of course bound to fail. I
think CRC is a good thing.
> Strange! Is there any reason then for allowing the setting?
Maybe not. I'll change that when I find the time.
> The traditional way of dealing with that situation, is having two
> speed steps. Hold the button down, and it steps in (the current) 1dB
> increments. Click the button, and it steps in the finer resolution.
> Everyone happy. This applies to any control with a wide settings
This means that users who don't want the fine control are forced to use
the key repeat. I don't like it.
> My Kenwood receiver, for example, has balance calibrated to dB. It is
> uncommon on consumer potables, but not home gear or pro stuff.
> Regardless the scale used, a more precise settings would be helpful.
> My left ear has some damage, so I really do use the balance control to
> compensate. In the current config, I would need a setting somewhere
> about 1/3 between 10% and 20% to get the stereo image correctly
So changing to 1% steps would solve at least part of your problem?
> I thought 20ms might have some use when playing back speech based
I'm not sure about that. The speech would probably sound weird. But
sure, we can add it.
Received on 2003-04-30