Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Red led dead - this is where it goes wrong!!!Re: Red led dead - this is where it goes wrong!!!
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Björn Stenberg <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:33:37 +0200
Mike Holden wrote:
> I'll have a look at this. I assume that USE_SLEEP will not be defined?
Correct.
> One other point I just noticed, slightly related! Should we in fact be
> calling ata_soft_reset() rather than perform_soft_reset(), since that
> performs the mutex locking as well as the reset?
No, we have already locked the mutex in read_sectors().
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:33:37 +0200
Mike Holden wrote:
> I'll have a look at this. I assume that USE_SLEEP will not be defined?
Correct.
> One other point I just noticed, slightly related! Should we in fact be
> calling ata_soft_reset() rather than perform_soft_reset(), since that
> performs the mutex locking as well as the reset?
No, we have already locked the mutex in read_sectors().
-- BjörnReceived on 2003-05-02
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy