From: Jean Boullier <jean.boullier_at_wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 17:45:11 +0200

Eric, I do not find the idea stupid per se but still I am wondering why
you want to reload another version when you no longer need Talkbox ? If
it is because it is not stable yet (pure guess, I have not tried it) or
because it always talks and you do not like it when you do not need it
(another pure guess) then the right solution is not to associate
different modules to different config files but (one) to "finish" the
Talkbox version or (two) to add the necessary Talkbox settings and save
them in the config file, no ?

In other worlds if your idea is essentially meant to fulfill a need for
us in the testers community I am not so sure it is so relevant.

Again, no offense intended to the Talkbox people, I have not tried it
(yet) and I am lazy enough right now to not go back through this
thread... 8-)

Cheers. Jean.

Eric Trondson-Clinger wrote:

>Thought I'd run this by y'all before submitting a feature request, just in
>case it's a really dumb idea. :)
>
>My thought was to add a setting to the CFG file that specifies which AJZ/MOD
>file to use. For example, I have two CFG files, one for use when I'm driving
>and one that I use when I'm not driving. Since I like using Talkbox when in
>the car, I thought it might be helpful to have the CFG file load that
>version of the firmware automatically when I select the Car CFG file and
>have my other CFG file load the other version of the firmware I have on my
>Recorder.
>
>Just a thought...if nobody tells me that this is a really stupid idea, I'll
>submit a feature request in a few days.
>
>Thanks again for all your hard work on Rockbox...I can't say I bought my
>Recorder because of it, but I know I would have sold it by now if Rockbox
>hadn't come along. You guys have done a great job!
>
>
>
Received on 2003-05-17