From: Filip <fille_at_nibewege.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 14:50:25 +0200

because it costs money for them to be busy with newer software ,
they wont get more proffit out of it when installing better software .

+ rockbox may not be sold as it is an open source project , i dont
think they can distribute it along with their products as it might be
considered selling it along with the hardware


At 14:27 21/06/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> > But we must remember that the Archos employees probably had less time
> > then we have had to write the original firmware. Plus, they had a
> > deadline and we don't. Their task was to write something that worked
> > OK in a short time.
>
>This answers the question about the past.
>
>But why not use it *now*? Why not switch to a better solution, why not
>support a better solution?
>
>
>--
>Holger Lembke Keep your Mailbox SPAM free:
>+49-531-334676 Disruptor OL http://disruptor.de/
Received on 2003-06-21