From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:49:30 +0100

At 09:18 01/07/03 +0100, you wrote:
>Linus Nielsen Feltzing said:
> > BlueChip wrote:
> >> PLEASE can we stick with THREE character extensions for our filenames?
> >
> > I agree. Three character extensions are almost a de facto standard.
>
>Only for people using a flawed O/S ;-)
>
>What about .html/.htm? .html is more a standard than .htm. With a modern
>O/S that handles long filenames properly, it really shouldn't make any
>difference whatsoever.
>--
>Mike Holden
>
>Rockbox page: http://www.mikeholden.org/~rockbox


I do not agree that Windoze is a "flawed O/S" ...I think it is a damned
virus ;)
Sadly, I, like billions of other PC owners, am still obliged to use it :(

Anyway, I shall comment no more on this subject, my vote has been placed in
favour of a more 'classic' file naming convention :)

BC
Received on 2003-07-01