|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Rockbox from flash questions from a user's point of viewRe: Rockbox from flash questions from a user's point of view
From: Chris Holt <amiga2k_at_cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:05:13 -0400 On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:11:00 +0200 (MEST), idc-dragon_at_gmx.de wrote: >>> I would imagine you could also still ROLO a daily build after your >>> 3 second boot process without incurring too much boredom. :) >>> >> >> I full agree with you. >> > I don't. Didn't measure it, but this loading and descrambling takes > pretty long, will probably double your boot time. > > In fact, the boot time is about 4 seconds now since I introduced the > checking for ajbrec.ajz present. I'm thinking about taking this out > again. If we can easily flash without risk, we don't really need that > feature. You still have the manual rolo if for special purpose you need > another software. Huh? Looks like you say you don't agree with me and then you say the same thing? Okay, you didn't understand I meant the current 3 second boot followed by a manual ROLO, or did you change your mind at some point? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but I never knew ROLO could be anything but manual. I wasn't proposing any checks for firmware. I would think that to be redundant given the capacity for two firmwares in ROM. > The flashing is pretty quick, just some seconds. For those concerned > about the wear: the chip is specified for 100.000 cycles. So, should be no issue at all for anyone who wants to flash every single daily build. >> If you flash Every daily build you have to boot at minimum 5 times a >> day to gain the time lost by flashing. >> > (Just thinking about how often I need to reboot before the weeks of > work on this pay off) But think about all the seconds everyone will save put together and it will pay off in just a few hours! ;) > Jörg Received on 2003-07-08 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |