Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: SH-1 scratchpad
RE: SH-1 scratchpad
From: Adam Billyard <Ads_at_CSL.COM>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:36:43 +0100
Sure but isn't there >2K sitting there doing nothing (0x0f000e50=_iramend).
I'd certainly put the stacks of time-critical threads in there.
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing [mailto:linus_at_haxx.se]
Sent: 11 July 2003 11:25
Subject: Re: SH-1 scratchpad
Adam Billyard wrote:
> Any reason you don't use SH-1 scratchpad for the stack storage? It should
> improve performance and it doesn't look like its being used by anything
If you mean the internal 4Kbyte RAM, we use it for time-critical code,
like the scheduler, bit swapping, ATA driver etc.
Received on 2003-07-11