Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: oog->mp3
From: mrlipring <mrlipring_at_tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:51:35 +0100
he didn't ask if it was adviseable or not. I'll assume he has an archos,
which only played mp3 the last time i knew. If he's downloaded some oggs,
he's not gonna notice *much* difference between a good ogg reencoded to say
128kbps, and an average 128kbps mp3.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Hak" <rhak_at_ramapo.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: oog->mp3
> yes... don't
> going from compressed to compressed increases the quality loss.
> just my 2 bits
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Holger Lembke wrote:
> something convenient, win32?
> Any suggestions?
> Holger Lembke
> +-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
> | Robert E. Hak < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak > |
> "If a cow and a half and a calf and a half can eat a bale and a half of
> in a day and a half, how many waffles does it take to shingle a dog
> - Random fortune from www.thinkgeek.com
Received on 2003-07-29