From: Robert Hak <rhak_at_ramapo.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:15:03 -0400 (EDT)

Actually he asked for 'any suggestions' my suggestion was not to do it :)


On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, mrlipring wrote:

he didn't ask if it was adviseable or not. I'll assume he has an archos,
which only played mp3 the last time i knew. If he's downloaded some oggs,
he's not gonna notice *much* difference between a good ogg reencoded to say
128kbps, and an average 128kbps mp3.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Hak" <rhak_at_ramapo.edu>
To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: oog->mp3


> yes... don't
>
> going from compressed to compressed increases the quality loss.
>
> just my 2 bits
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Holger Lembke wrote:
>
>
> something convenient, win32?
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> --
> Holger Lembke
> +49-531-334676
>
>
> +-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
> | Robert E. Hak < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak > |
>
> "If a cow and a half and a calf and a half can eat a bale and a half of
hay
> in a day and a half, how many waffles does it take to shingle a dog
house?"
> - Random fortune from www.thinkgeek.com
>
>



+-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
| Robert E. Hak < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak > |

"If a cow and a half and a calf and a half can eat a bale and a half of hay
 in a day and a half, how many waffles does it take to shingle a dog house?"
        - Random fortune from www.thinkgeek.com
Received on 2003-07-29