Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: DescramblingRe: Descrambling
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Magnus Holmgren <lear_at_algonet.se>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:45:00 +0200
Björn Stenberg wrote:
>>It means an additional 80 bytes of the
>>internal RAM is used (this includes the descramble code). Even if the
>>ROLO stuff, per definition, isn't executed much, I'd say it's worth it
>>:) But what do you think? Should I leave that in the patch?
>
>
> Yes, leave it in. If we find better use for the internal ram later, we can always move it out again.
>
OK, submitted as patch 785885.
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:45:00 +0200
Björn Stenberg wrote:
>>It means an additional 80 bytes of the
>>internal RAM is used (this includes the descramble code). Even if the
>>ROLO stuff, per definition, isn't executed much, I'd say it's worth it
>>:) But what do you think? Should I leave that in the patch?
>
>
> Yes, leave it in. If we find better use for the internal ram later, we can always move it out again.
>
OK, submitted as patch 785885.
-- Magnus HolmgrenReceived on 2003-08-09
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy