|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: JBR vs FMR? Which one is betterRe: JBR vs FMR? Which one is better
From: Mike Holden <rockbox_at_mikeholden.uklinux.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:11:19 +0100 (BST) Shawn Watson said: > Go with the JBR. I'm with you on wanting to be able to swap out the > batteries to perhaps extend play time when travelling, stuff like that. > The JBFMR is lighter and smaller, but not by much; and let's face it, if > you want lighter and smaller go iPodding. I want a radio built in also > but it seems that it's impossible to fit a radio in without bulking up > the player (all mp3 players with FM tuners suck!) and I want smaller and > portable. I think I'll buy a player with an FM tuner when they state > that it's a free add on that does not effect the player size - it seems > we do not have the technology yet :). You say that "the JBFMR is lighter and smaller" than the JBR, and then you say that "it's impossible to fit a radio in without bulking up the player". You need to make your mind up which, as these 2 statements dierctly contradict each other! -- Mike Holden Rockbox page: http://www.mikeholden.org/~rockboxReceived on 2003-08-13 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |