From: mourad jaber <mjaber_at_centralpay.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:32:40 +0200

Sorry, I forgot lot's of things in my post :(
My home build seem to be more unstable than the official build both come
from the today's CVS ( 20030825 )....
My home build can't record more than 1minute ( quality level = 4 )
before it freeze and sometimes it create an empty file and freeze after
that ( I have the same pb with the flashed version ( with the official
daily ucl ) but after a longer time about 3minute but it doen't seem to
append with ajbrec.ajz load by achos firmware ( with ON+F1 ) ).
When I use home build Rockbox in my car ( with 7 sec of anti-skip buffer
), with same mp3 files, there are lots of cut, and regularly, the play
freeze and I need to skip some songs before it restart playing it...
And I can't charge fully cells ( I think it is not specificaly my home
build because I need to charge with the original firmware to get battery
fully charged... every time I tried with Rockbox, battery didn't go
highter than 50% ).
To generate the cross compiler, I did it by reading the howto build a
cross compiler from rockbox site...

My hardware info :
jbr20, original firmware version 1.28
[Hardware Info]
ROM: 2.00
Mask: 0x0302
USB: positive
ATA: 0x200, master
PR: positive
Flash: M=BF D=D6
ROM CRC: 0x222F V1

I hope it is more helpfull than my preview post

Mourad

Daniel Stenberg wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, mourad jaber wrote:
>
>
>
>>I have the pb every time I compile rockbox, last try was with the
>>today's daily cvs sources....
>>It is something wrong with my compiler ?
>>
>>
>
>What problem are you having?
>
>
>
>>every time i compile my self rockbox build are a little smaller than
>>"official" daily builds....
>>
>>
>
>Why is this a problem?
>
>
>
>>I'm working with a Mandrake 9.1 and my cross compiler was compiled with :
>>binutils 2.13.2, gcc 3.2.2, gdb 5.3
>>
>>Is there something wrong with that version ?
>>
>>
>
>Why would it be?
>
>
>
>>The daily build version is working good on my jb20
>>
>>
>
>That one is built with a different compiler/utility version setup and will of
>course differ slightly from the results your combination produces. It still
>doesn't mean your combination is bad.
>
>
>
Received on 2003-08-25