From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 08:13:13 +0100

hmm, very interesting... which "different docs" have you read? and are you
prepared to share them?

>euh, I know it's in the "nodo" but if one day you find how to play wav
>files, will you bring OGG and WMA ?
>lol, just kidding !
>I've read different docs about the MAS and I'm sure that it's not possible !
>I think that even Archos will not be able to do this (they should have all
>docs and support from micronas)
>I have a suggestion : rename this thread to "psycho problems with the NODO
>!"
>;-)
> Stéphane BILLES
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "BlueChip" <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
>To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:43 AM
>Subject: Re: play WAV?
>
>
> >
> > >Ah, you are joking. Now I get it. And while you're at it, you're trying
>to
> > >get a rise out of this, to insult Daniel and Linus, and let them take the
> > >blame for you doing so. Smart.
> >
> > It is NOT my intention to "insult" anyone - I do not consider disagreeing
> > to be insulting. And I have already apologised for opening the door to
>the
> > possibility of this mistake being made.
> >
> > It is also NOT my intention for there to be anything for "blame" to be
> > attached to. We are all equally to 'blame' for not solving this problem
> > sooner! It would be pointless for one person to take on more blame than
> > another ...and wiser still to avoid using the word "blame", no?
> >
> > My intentions are to make it clear to the 'uninitiated' that these things
> > (WAV playback etc.) *ARE* possible - and to encourage greater teamwork to
> > resolve them. It is rare for a non-techie to have an ideal opportunity to
> > make such a great and positive difference to an otherwise technical
>project.
> >
> > > > anal retentive
> > >
> > >You mean asshole?
> >
> > hee hee - on a mailing list this large, I knew SOMEONE wouldn't be able to
> > resist that joke ;)
> >
> > "Anal retentive" is a Freudian term used to stereo-type people. I believe
> > the actual definition is something like "one whose primary value system
> > developed during the potty* stage"
> >
> > * In case "potty" does not translate - it is an English term for the
>little
> > plastic training toilet used by small children.
> >
> > A quick search turned up this page which is more precise on the subject -
>a
> > typically anally-retentive response to a humerously anally-retentive
> > question :)
> > http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a940211.html
> >
> > >(No, please, take no offense, as you don't want us to take any offense
> > >from your posts)
> >
> > None taken, irrespective of my previous posts :)
> >
> > >Man, do YOU have an attitude problem!
> >
> > Only when compared to others who have a different value system to me.
> > But I suppose at that level, everybody has some form of problem with their
> > value system.
> >
> > Pesemists and Realists (and also Optimists) often find it difficult to
> > relate to each other on issues which require team effort. But it is
> > precisely that diversity that is makes a team of individuals successful in
> > creating a good-sounding end result.
> >
> > >I used to be like you, you know. Wouldn't/couldn't take no for an answer
> > >and hard-headed as hell. Back in the days when I was 4.
> >
> > According to:
> > http://psychology.about.com/library/weekly/aa111500b.htm
> > that makes you a "Phallic" ...apparently!?
> > ...I never knew that before!
> > ...they say you learn somethng new every day :)
> >
> > Thanks for your help. The more we all work together, the quicker we will
> > find a solution :)
> >
> > BC
> >
> >
Received on 2003-09-03