Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Long term recording tests...

Re: Long term recording tests...

From: ajf <ajf_at_midmaine.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:58:24 -0400

I would vote for an optional or no VBR header, especially if it reduces the
gap in time split recordings.

Martin Borus writes:

> Am 14 Oct 2003 um 10:38 hat Dave Jones geschrieben:
>
>> I could also submit a patch that would
>> turn off the VBR header writing code if the record split feature is
>> enabled. That would be the easiest short-term work-around. Any comments?
>
> I would like that. For my long time recordings the VBR header
> normally doesn't make any sense anyways:
> I always cut them up later using mp3directcut to get the bits of the
> recording I want. Also, this might reduce the gap in the recording.
>
> What do the "other long time recorders" think?
 
Received on 2003-10-14

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy