Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Long term recording tests...
Re: Long term recording tests...
From: ajf <ajf_at_midmaine.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:58:24 -0400
I would vote for an optional or no VBR header, especially if it reduces the
gap in time split recordings.
Martin Borus writes:
> Am 14 Oct 2003 um 10:38 hat Dave Jones geschrieben:
>> I could also submit a patch that would
>> turn off the VBR header writing code if the record split feature is
>> enabled. That would be the easiest short-term work-around. Any comments?
> I would like that. For my long time recordings the VBR header
> normally doesn't make any sense anyways:
> I always cut them up later using mp3directcut to get the bits of the
> recording I want. Also, this might reduce the gap in the recording.
> What do the "other long time recorders" think?
Received on 2003-10-14