Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Unsubscribing
From: Jack <jack_at_sylviawebster.f2s.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:56:18 +0000
Indeed, I was. Mail Headers are a really illogical place to put something like that. I wouldn't think of looking there. Am I stupid?
On 27.10.2003 at 01:51 PM Chris Hoekstra wrote:
>I am thinking he was not imagining smtp headers, but more of a
>footer/header concept like what a word processor utilizes. So a header
>would come before every message in his vision of what was proposed.
>In reality, we are talking of SMTP headers that are usually hidden by
>the client unless one needs to see these advanced bits of information.
>Even though the decision has been cast, I do agree that a simple 1 or 2
>line footer is FAR more effective for numpties/noobs than a potentially
>hidden header that most noobs don't even know exist.
>Chris Holt wrote:
>> I really dislike footers. How do you foresee headers being obstructive?
>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 22:40:40 +0000, Jack wrote:
>>>I agree that maybe an automatic footer (I think headers would be
>>>obstructive) would be a good idea. Maybe just a link to the Mail List
>>>home page, or even Rockbox's home page?
Jack (My Website)
Received on 2003-10-27